A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #241  
Old November 1st 07, 10:09 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.travel.air
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA


"Jon" wrote

http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/

The Centurion should transport you whereever you may desire, in
relative style, comfort, and most importantly, protection...


Oh, now you've done it! Now there will soon be a world wide aluminum foil
shortage, as the "fringe" element people are trying to design and test new
designs that will prove to be more effective in blocking the radio waves
from controlling their minds.

Thanks a lot! ;-)
--
Jim in NC


  #242  
Old November 1st 07, 10:16 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Frank Ch. Eigler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 89
Default CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA


Newps writes:

[...] Once the spacing has been established GPS is irrelevant in
maintaining it. The minimum spacing can not be reduced from what it
is now unless aircraft can be designed to be unaffected by wake
turbulence. [...]


Does that not just affect in-trail separation?

- FChE
  #243  
Old November 1st 07, 10:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,886
Default CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA



Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Newps writes:


[...] Once the spacing has been established GPS is irrelevant in
maintaining it. The minimum spacing can not be reduced from what it
is now unless aircraft can be designed to be unaffected by wake
turbulence. [...]



Does that not just affect in-trail separation?




Yes, but at the major airports the arrivals start approx 150 nm from the
airport. That's the latest aircraft start to get in trail. At the
busiest times the approach controls will slap a restriction onto the
centers for anywhere from 10-20 miles in trail for aircraft going into
the same airport that will start hundreds of miles from the destination.
Then as they get closer the aircraft streams will be joined together
to their minimum allowed separation.
  #244  
Old November 1st 07, 10:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.travel.air
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,886
Default CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA



John Kulp wrote:




You need to review minimum separation standards so you don't sound so
stupid. Do that and get back to us. You can find them here.

http://www.faa.gov/regulations_polic...a/7110.65R.pdf



Are you really so stupid you pinhead that you still can't understand
the difference between what the situation is now, which no disputes,
and what it is thought it can be? Answer, yes you are or you wouldn't
continue to post this drivel.


Nice, poke a bunch of holes in your theory of panacea and you go all to
pieces. When you get actual experience instead of having read a
magazine article let us know.

  #245  
Old November 2nd 07, 12:03 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.travel.air
Marty Shapiro
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 287
Default CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA

Newps wrote in
:



John Kulp wrote:




You need to review minimum separation standards so you don't sound so
stupid. Do that and get back to us. You can find them here.

http://www.faa.gov/regulations_polic...ir_traffic_ord
ers/media/7110.65R.pdf



Are you really so stupid you pinhead that you still can't understand
the difference between what the situation is now, which no disputes,
and what it is thought it can be? Answer, yes you are or you
wouldn't continue to post this drivel.


Nice, poke a bunch of holes in your theory of panacea and you go all
to pieces. When you get actual experience instead of having read a
magazine article let us know.



Newps - I shouldn't have called Kulp a moron. He needs an IQ boost
of a few million orders of magnitude to reach the level of moron.

--
Marty Shapiro
Silicon Rallye Inc.

(remove SPAMNOT to email me)
  #246  
Old November 2nd 07, 12:10 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.travel.air
M.W. Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA


"Newps" wrote in message
. ..


John Kulp wrote:




You need to review minimum separation standards so you don't sound so
stupid. Do that and get back to us. You can find them here.

http://www.faa.gov/regulations_polic...a/7110.65R.pdf



Are you really so stupid you pinhead that you still can't understand
the difference between what the situation is now, which no disputes,
and what it is thought it can be? Answer, yes you are or you wouldn't
continue to post this drivel.


Nice, poke a bunch of holes in your theory of panacea and you go all to
pieces. When you get actual experience instead of having read a magazine
article let us know.


Is this Kulp ninny another MX alias?


  #247  
Old November 2nd 07, 12:21 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.travel.air
John Kulp
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 78
Default CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA

On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:03:26 GMT, Marty Shapiro
wrote:


Newps - I shouldn't have called Kulp a moron. He needs an IQ boost
of a few million orders of magnitude to reach the level of moron.


The coterie of complete idiots meet
  #248  
Old November 2nd 07, 12:28 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.travel.air
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,886
Default CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA

Hey cool, we're a coterie. Is that anything like a cabal?




John Kulp wrote:

On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:03:26 GMT, Marty Shapiro
wrote:



Newps - I shouldn't have called Kulp a moron. He needs an IQ boost
of a few million orders of magnitude to reach the level of moron.



The coterie of complete idiots meet

  #249  
Old November 2nd 07, 12:33 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.travel.air
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA


"M.W. Barrow" wrote

Is this Kulp ninny another MX alias?


I'm always quick to jump on an allegation like that, but this time, I don't
think so.

The writing isn't his style, I don't think.

You know, k00ks attract k00ks.

I guess that's why Bunyip's here! g
--
Jim in NC


  #250  
Old November 2nd 07, 12:46 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,851
Default CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA

Jon wrote in
oups.com:

On Nov 1, 3:36 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Justin Case wrote in
news:Xns99DB6CDF2711EJCPost@ 216.168.3.50:
[...]
You just gotta put on your tinfoil hat and listen.


Could never find one that has that certain "dash"

And as my mom always told me, if yer gonna wear a hat ya gotta wear
it like ya mean it.

Bertie


http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/

The Centurion should transport you whereever you may desire, in
relative style, comfort, and most importantly, protection...



What more can you ask for in protection?


bertie
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Travel aid [email protected] Soaring 0 February 7th 06 12:25 PM
Travel aid [email protected] Restoration 0 February 7th 06 12:25 PM
Travel aid [email protected] General Aviation 0 February 7th 06 12:25 PM
Travel aid [email protected] Aviation Marketplace 0 February 7th 06 12:25 PM
Travel Supplements Jetnw Aviation Marketplace 0 September 15th 04 07:50 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.