A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Products
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Garmin takes over



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 27th 04, 04:42 AM
FISHnFLY
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Garmin takes over

http://www.garmin.com/products/g1000/

Looks like we'll eventually be down to one avionics manufacturer to
choose from. I don't neccessarily think this is a good thing. Anyone
else's take on this?
  #2  
Old February 27th 04, 04:03 PM
Richard Kaplan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Looks like we'll eventually be down to one avionics manufacturer to
choose from. I don't neccessarily think this is a good thing. Anyone
else's take on this?



At least there are currently competing vendors to replace your GPS or
Nav/com or audio panel or engine instruments or whatever.

If you were to fly an airplane with the new Garmin G1000, the entire
avionics and engine instrumentation system is certified en block and thus
for the life of the airplane you would be dependent on Garmin for parts and
repairs. If the integrated tachometer broke, for example, you could not
buy one from a competing source. Etc. for all the parts.

Imagine if 20 years ago you bought a computer or audio system or whatever
electronic device and now you had to rely on the original vendor to keep the
equipment operating. Now imagine that that original computer system
operates a $250,000+ piece of machinery... that would not be a pleasant
situation to be in, yet that is exactly the situation owners of G1000
airplanes will be in 10 or 20 or 30 years from now. The G1000 is the ENTIRE
panel! Third-party modifications are likely to be very difficult since that
would involve modifying proprietary software.

Look at the space shuttle for a comparable example; even NASA is starting to
have difficulty obtaining parts for the 1970s era computers on the space
shuttle.

A glass cockpit is great, but in order for this not to involve unreasonable
economic risk on the part of the airplane owners the design needs to be be
more modular and open-ended, just like the PC industry and in fact just like
our existing system of "steam gauge" instruments and avionics installations.


--
Richard Kaplan, CFII

www.flyimc.com


  #3  
Old February 27th 04, 05:59 PM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

FISHnFLY,

http://www.garmin.com/products/g1000/

Looks like we'll eventually be down to one avionics manufacturer to
choose from. I don't neccessarily think this is a good thing. Anyone
else's take on this?


Uh, Avidyne Entegra, Chelton and that fourth company I keep forgetting.
And then there's Bendix/King/Honeywell or whatever their current name
is. They'll come up with something.

You know, this is a VERY small market. We're down to a handful of
aircraft manufacturers, too, and it'll soon become less, I'm convinced.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #4  
Old March 2nd 04, 06:05 AM
Dean Wilkinson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yes, but so far Garmin and Avidyne have all of the OEM business.
Chelton is pretty much just after-market installations. It's looking
like a fairly even split between Garmin and Avidyne for the bulk of
the new airplane market.

Thomas Borchert wrote in message ...
FISHnFLY,

http://www.garmin.com/products/g1000/

Looks like we'll eventually be down to one avionics manufacturer to
choose from. I don't neccessarily think this is a good thing. Anyone
else's take on this?


Uh, Avidyne Entegra, Chelton and that fourth company I keep forgetting.
And then there's Bendix/King/Honeywell or whatever their current name
is. They'll come up with something.

You know, this is a VERY small market. We're down to a handful of
aircraft manufacturers, too, and it'll soon become less, I'm convinced.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Review of the Garmin GPSMAP 296 GPS Rhett Piloting 10 March 23rd 05 01:16 AM
Pirep: Garmin GPSMAP 296 versus 295. (very long) Jon Woellhaf Piloting 12 September 4th 04 11:55 PM
Garmin takes over Richard Kaplan Instrument Flight Rules 39 March 9th 04 03:41 PM
Garmin DME arc weidnress Dave Touretzky Instrument Flight Rules 5 October 2nd 03 02:04 AM
Garmin 90 Database Updates Discontinued Val Christian Piloting 14 August 20th 03 09:32 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.