If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
"Chad Irby" wrote in message ... In article , "Tarver Engineering" wrote: I mean Lockheed built DG's entry in the design competition. Backpedaling again. Nope. USAF was so hot to let a fighter contract to Lockheed that they seleced a design that could not even fly. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote: USAF was so hot to let a fighter contract to Lockheed that they seleced a design that could not even fly. You're still telling us that the F-22 isn't flying. -- cirby at cfl.rr.com Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations. Slam on brakes accordingly. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
"Chad Irby" wrote in message om... In article , "Tarver Engineering" wrote: USAF was so hot to let a fighter contract to Lockheed that they seleced a design that could not even fly. You're still telling us that the F-22 isn't flying. Put down the crack pipe, Irby. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote: Put down the crack pipe, Irby. Best way to tell you've lost. Sixth-grade insults. -- cirby at cfl.rr.com Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations. Slam on brakes accordingly. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
"Chad Irby" wrote in message m... In article , "Tarver Engineering" wrote: Put down the crack pipe, Irby. Best way to tell you've lost. Sixth-grade insults. Does it upset you that I can post on your level, Irby? |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:10:54 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote: "Chad Irby" wrote in message om... In article , Scott Ferrin wrote: On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 15:09:49 -0800, "Tarver Engineering" wrote: Georgia pork Explain how the airforce wanting the aircraft is "pork". Any airframe that Tarver can't make any money off of is, apparently, evil. The USAF was so hot to contract an a fighter from Lockheed that they selected a design that would not even fly. For once you have a good point but honestly I think it had more to do with they knew Lockheed and Northrop could deliver stealth. GD's didn't appear to be particularly stealthy with that huge vertical tail and Boeing. . .well, was Boeing. If they'd wanted Pork I'd think they'd have chosen GD's design and built theirs in Texas. Bush senior was VP at the time of the down-selecting to two designs. However you boil it down though why would the USAF be hot to buy from Lockheed over the tried and proven McDonnell Douglas team? |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote: Does it upset you that I can post on your level, Irby? We'll let you know if you ever manage to. On the other hand, we're still waiting for those strake photos. Or references on mud bees in pitot tubes. Or the name of someone who got arrested for taking photos of F-22s. Or, well, *anything* to back up the stuff you post. And we get to add "F-22s can't fly" and "Lockheed-Martin sold all of their avionics businesses" to the ever-growing list of Tarverisms. -- cirby at cfl.rr.com Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations. Slam on brakes accordingly. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
"Chad Irby" wrote in message om... In article , "Tarver Engineering" wrote: Does it upset you that I can post on your level, Irby? We'll let you know if you ever manage to. It is difficult for me, but your childishness is a special case. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
"Scott Ferrin" wrote in message ... On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:10:54 -0800, "Tarver Engineering" wrote: "Chad Irby" wrote in message om... In article , Scott Ferrin wrote: On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 15:09:49 -0800, "Tarver Engineering" wrote: Georgia pork Explain how the airforce wanting the aircraft is "pork". Any airframe that Tarver can't make any money off of is, apparently, evil. The USAF was so hot to contract an a fighter from Lockheed that they selected a design that would not even fly. For once you have a good point but honestly I think it had more to do with they knew Lockheed and Northrop could deliver stealth. GD had the Ft Worth line. Northrop had the B-2. McDonnell had the F-15 and the F-18. The Military Industrial complex needed another player. GD's didn't appear to be particularly stealthy with that huge vertical tail and Boeing. . .well, was Boeing. If they'd wanted Pork I'd think they'd have chosen GD's design and built theirs in Texas. GD already had a fighter in production. Bush senior was VP at the time of the down-selecting to two designs. However you boil it down though why would the USAF be hot to buy from Lockheed over the tried and proven McDonnell Douglas team? See above. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
EAA Hangar Purchase | Kyle Boatright | Home Built | 1 | March 30th 04 04:49 AM |
For all to view - worth the wait! | Kilroy | Military Aviation | 1 | July 2nd 03 08:10 PM |