A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Future of DMAFB



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 24th 04, 04:32 PM
Slapshot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Future of DMAFB

Any news floating around out there regarding the future of Davis-Monthan?
With the A-10's slated to be retired, local media has mentioned that it will
become an F-22 base in the next few years. However, I can find no follow up
information to confirm this.

Also have heard that the EC-130's will be going elsewhere.

Closure seems unlikely, however it is one of the bases greatly effected by
urban sprawl as Tucson now totally surrounds the base to within a few meters
in some areas.

How would AMARC factor into a closure decision? Would AMARC stick around as
a seperate installation? Would seem nigh impossible, if not rather idiotic,
to move AMARC in any fashion, given the sheer number of aircraft out there.

Paul


  #2  
Old February 24th 04, 04:52 PM
Tex Houston
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Slapshot" wrote in message
news:81L_b.303$3X2.48@okepread04...
Any news floating around out there regarding the future of Davis-Monthan?


Also have heard that the EC-130's will be going elsewhere.

Paul


Since the EC-130Hs are not assigned to the 355th but are tenant it would
seem they would prime candidates for relocation.

Tex




  #3  
Old February 25th 04, 12:03 AM
R Haskin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

A-10's slated to be retired??

The latest speech from the SECAF says this:

"So, we will cull from the A-10 force some as yet to be determined number of
aircraft in the best condition for sensor system upgrades, re-enginning, and
service life extension to bridge the force to the new F-35 CAS fleet."

Ref :http://www.af.mil/speech/speech.asp?speechID=64

That doesn't sound to me like an intent to retire the Hog anytime soon.


"Slapshot" wrote in message
news:81L_b.303$3X2.48@okepread04...
Any news floating around out there regarding the future of Davis-Monthan?
With the A-10's slated to be retired, local media has mentioned that it

will
become an F-22 base in the next few years. However, I can find no follow

up
information to confirm this.

Also have heard that the EC-130's will be going elsewhere.

Closure seems unlikely, however it is one of the bases greatly effected by
urban sprawl as Tucson now totally surrounds the base to within a few

meters
in some areas.

How would AMARC factor into a closure decision? Would AMARC stick around

as
a seperate installation? Would seem nigh impossible, if not rather

idiotic,
to move AMARC in any fashion, given the sheer number of aircraft out

there.

Paul




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Future of Glass Goose? geo Home Built 16 May 2nd 04 10:37 PM
Future military fighters and guns - yes or no ? championsleeper Military Aviation 77 March 3rd 04 04:11 AM
Future Combat Systems program networked vehicles and drones Larry Dighera Military Aviation 1 December 13th 03 07:24 PM
UNMANNED, THE WAY OF THE FUTURE Larry Dighera Military Aviation 13 November 29th 03 05:50 PM
Air Force Academy Introduces Sweeping Changes, Looks to Future Otis Willie Military Aviation 1 October 8th 03 07:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.