If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Which PC Flightplanning Software EFB Would You Recommend?
Hello!
I will be getting a tablet PC (thinking about the Motion Computing LE800), and will be buying a flightplanning software package for IFR soon. I've been looking around at all the different options (Seattle Avionics Voyager/GlassView), RMS FlightsoftPro/Vista, FlightPrep, EverywhereMap, etc. It is quite confusing. It seems that Seattle Avionics is the most reasonably priced, but SLOW! FlightPrep looks nice, but at $500/yr, a bit too pricey for my blood. Flightsoft seems like it might have everything, but not sure, and they don't allow a trial download. What are your experiences? Thanks! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Been there, done that. Comments below.
On 9/12/2005 10:40 AM, FlyBean wrote the following: Hello! I will be getting a tablet PC (thinking about the Motion Computing LE800), You want the View Anywhere screen, which I understand is not quite yet available. Also, that one is 800x600, so things will be a little more crowded than on the 1024x768 screens like my HP T1100. and will be buying a flightplanning software package for IFR soon. I've been looking around at all the different options (Seattle Avionics Voyager/GlassView), RMS FlightsoftPro/Vista, FlightPrep, EverywhereMap, etc. It is quite confusing. Yes. This area of the market is changing almost hourly. You just have to bite the bullet and make your best decision. It seems that Seattle Avionics is the most reasonably priced, but SLOW! and immature. Re slow, they are doomed because they are using MS dot-net. Also huge amounts of memory required. I do have/use Smartplates though and like it. FlightPrep looks nice, but at $500/yr, a bit too pricey for my blood. They have just changed their pricing policy so you don't have to buy the full subscription. Check with them. (like I said, the situation changes fast!) Also, that is the price for the top of the line moving map, etc. not just for the flight planner. Flightprep is the one I chose, one reason being that they offered to add me to their beta test team. They announced 3.0 at OSH and I can tell you that it is pretty spectacular. Beyond that, you'll have to see what they have published on it as I am under an NDA. Release is a month or two out, I think. Flightsoft seems like it might have everything, but not sure, and they don't allow a trial download. What are your experiences? Same reason I rejected it. No trial period. (Same problem with AnyWhere map which is really a PDA application anyway.) Also, I think RMS is well behind Seattle Avionics and Flightprep on the availability of georeferenced charts and plates. Don't know about SA, but Flightprep even has the airport diagrams georeferenced. That's pretty neat at a strange airport! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Mitty wrote On 09/12/05 09:46,: It seems that Seattle Avionics is the most reasonably priced, but SLOW! and immature. Re slow, they are doomed because they are using MS dot-net. Also huge amounts of memory required. I do have/use Smartplates though and like it. ..net suffers mainly from "diarreah of the .dll", but so do a lot of C/C++ based applications. Also, are they doing all of it, or just part of it, in .net ? FlightPrep looks nice, but at $500/yr, a bit too pricey for my blood. Nobody likes Jepp flightmap anymore ? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On 9/12/2005 1:35 PM, Scott Moore wrote the following: Mitty wrote On 09/12/05 09:46,: It seems that Seattle Avionics is the most reasonably priced, but SLOW! and immature. Re slow, they are doomed because they are using MS dot-net. Also huge amounts of memory required. I do have/use Smartplates though and like it. .net suffers mainly from "diarreah of the .dll", but so do a lot of C/C++ based applications. Also, are they doing all of it, or just part of it, in .net ? I don't know the fine points. What I know is that I had to get a giant download from M$ just to run the SA stuff at all and that it is very slow and very, very memory hungry. I am running only the Smartplates module, which consumes 69 meg of memory just to catalog and print out a few pieces of paper. This is over three times the size of Word and four times the size of Excel, both of which actually DO something with their pieces of paper and neither of which is renowned for being parsimonious with system resources. I am willing to tolerate this because I like the app, but that does not mean I think the design decision was in users' best interests. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Nobody likes Jepp flightmap anymore ?
Not FliteMap, but the new JeppView & FliteDeck. I am going to be flamed, but I love mine. Number one complaint about Jepp products is their price. But if you don't need the whole country, just subscript to your local area and buy Tripkit when you make that once a year long trip. I paid $100 one-time plus $195 a year for southwest area. A JeppView Tripkit costs about the same as printed Tripkit which is around $55 for most areas. If the moving map is what you are after, FliteMap is better than anything else I have tried. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
FlyBean wrote:
Hello! I will be getting a tablet PC (thinking about the Motion Computing LE800), and will be buying a flightplanning software package for IFR soon. I've been looking around at all the different options (Seattle Avionics Voyager/GlassView), RMS FlightsoftPro/Vista, FlightPrep, EverywhereMap, etc. It is quite confusing. It seems that Seattle Avionics is the most reasonably priced, but SLOW! FlightPrep looks nice, but at $500/yr, a bit too pricey for my blood. Flightsoft seems like it might have everything, but not sure, and they don't allow a trial download. What are your experiences? Thanks! Flightsoft is great. Been using it since before windows. Very stable, good updates, sectionals low altitude, etc. all downloaded. About $100 per year. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Mitty wrote:
I don't know the fine points. Keep this in mind... ... I am willing to tolerate this because I like the app, but that does not mean I think the design decision was in users' best interests. Poor design is an issue regardless of platform and what you described is more a function of poor application design than an issue with .NET. You made the comment "they are doomed because they are using .NET", but then admit you don't know the "fine points" and describe a series of issues unrelated to the use of .NET. Rather than make a blanket statement you know to be based on ignorance, why not send them a note informing them of your decision and the reasons for it. You may be surprised to know how valuable your feedback is to the development team. -- John T http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415 Reduce spam. Use Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com ____________________ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
One really doesn't need to know the fine points. All one needs to know is that
the app is based on Microsoft "technology." Huge and slow follow as the tail follows the dog. They have been doing this for years because they are financially motivated to avoid small and fast. Huge and slow drives purchases of new computers, which not at all coincidentally is Microsoft's main revenue driver. Everything else is fine points. Incidentally, I began my career as a computer architect and programmer when it was still necessary to build a room if you wanted a computer and I had an ARPAnet ID long before anyone realized what it would become. So I do have a bit of perspective about these things. (Sorry for the OT response to the OT post. I'll not post OT in this thread again.) On 9/18/2005 9:12 AM, John T wrote the following: Mitty wrote: I don't know the fine points. Keep this in mind... ... I am willing to tolerate this because I like the app, but that does not mean I think the design decision was in users' best interests. Poor design is an issue regardless of platform and what you described is more a function of poor application design than an issue with .NET. You made the comment "they are doomed because they are using .NET", but then admit you don't know the "fine points" and describe a series of issues unrelated to the use of .NET. Rather than make a blanket statement you know to be based on ignorance, why not send them a note informing them of your decision and the reasons for it. You may be surprised to know how valuable your feedback is to the development team. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Mitty wrote:
One really doesn't need to know the fine points. All one needs to know is that the app is based on Microsoft "technology." Huge and slow follow as the tail follows the dog. Ah, so you have an anti-MS bias. That's OK as long as people realize it when reading your posts saying that just because something is built on x technology it must be inferior/slow/poorly designed/what-have-you. It's kinda like saying "that plane can't possibly be any good because it has a Lycoming engine." Or "it uses a G1000". Or, perhaps most accurately, "it's made by Cessna/Piper/Cirrus/Lancair." Incidentally, I began my career as a computer architect and programmer when it was still necessary to build a room if you wanted a computer and I had an ARPAnet ID long before anyone realized what it would become. So I do have a bit of perspective about these things. Then you should understand the value of consumer feedback. If you haven't already, send the developers a note stating your observations on performance and usability. Unless, of course, you want them to fail - which is OK, too, really. -- John T http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415 Reduce spam. Use Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com ____________________ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Actually, I did write an e-mail to them, explaining my problem (i.e.
Voyager brings my 256 MB PIIIM Sony Vaio to its knees, crawling to do anything), but never received a reply from them. As for Jeppesen, I had a friend who had the whole shabang installed (JeppView, JeppStar, and FlightDeck). He finally went over to FlightPrep back when it was still $350/yr incl. on-line and unlimited updates. Jepp seemed pretty good, but could never find any information on line about the new package. I finally called them, and they gave me the "secret" URL http://www.jeppesen.com/navsuite. There it is! With Great Lakes coverage, it come out to about $560/yr. That is now cheaper than FlightPrep and includes paper LowAlt charts, but of course is only Great Lakes, so don't go too far without a Trip Kit. I am now trying to get AirPlan from RazorsEdge working, but keep getting errors. They are working with me to fix it, though. We shall see... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[!] Russian Arms software sale | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 18th 04 05:51 PM | |
Free Flight Planning Software | Dean Wilkinson | Piloting | 20 | September 25th 04 03:38 AM |
Free Flight Planning Software | Dean Wilkinson | Products | 0 | September 18th 04 10:44 PM |
IFR Flightplanning Software | Kai Glaesner | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | September 15th 04 06:15 PM |
Next: Aviation Map software | Toks Desalu | Piloting | 5 | May 24th 04 07:55 PM |