A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Norway may ditch the JSF!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old May 1st 04, 09:07 AM
John Cook
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Eurofighter encounters a glitch

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=au...x.co m&rnum=1


Uhmmm...all you did there was note that one crashed (kind of hard to dance
away from that one), and supposedly why that happened. OTOH, after a few
much more knowledgable folks took you to task over that whole "Typhoons whip
F-15's in spur-of-the-moment-DACM" bit, you continued to stick by that
account.


Latest news is it happened in under 9 seconds, and the radar
recording of the event will be shown at one of the Typhoon displays
at future Airshows, Perhaps you could pop along and gaffaw in the
background.

Now answer my question - Do you have _anything_ useful to add to this
thread regarding the JSF?


An ambitious aircraft development program of great promise, with a rather
radical (i.e., widespread participation)development plan, experiencing the
kind of developmental hiccups one should expect at this early stage of the
program. And the sky has not fallen, despite reports to the contrary.



Thats useful!!! Bloody hell, Thanks a bunch Kevin!, you have finally
lowered my expectations of you to a level at which even you can
perform.

How about trying to stay on topic, If you want to argue, fine, go find
another nutcase and stop bleating about what a fine job everyones
doing in Iraq.

My dad used to say "you have to admire people who's opinions aint
swayed by reality"

Cheers
John Cook

Any spelling mistakes/grammatic errors are there purely to annoy. All
opinions are mine, not TAFE's however much they beg me for them.

Email Address :-
Spam trap - please remove (trousers) to email me
Eurofighter Website :-
http://www.eurofighter-typhoon.co.uk
  #12  
Old May 10th 04, 08:39 PM
Mary Shafer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 23:39:20 -0400, "Kevin Brooks"
wrote:

"John Cook" wrote in message
...


Saying that more Iraqi's are being serviced by the electrical grid
isn't the best example you could give at the moment - Many have seen
the pictures of that Iraqi prisoner hooked up to it ;-).


Not really a laughing matter--and of course, the individuals responsible
were brought up on charges before the press even went public with that
story. A number of personnel facing courts martial, and a fair number of
more senior leaders receiving non-judicial punishment for lesser related
offenses, because a troopie did what he was supposed to do (report
improper/illegal behavior). So the end game looks like a few individuals
screwed up, are facing the consequences, and the US Army met its obligation
to investigate and take punitive action where appropriate--not a bad thing,
IMO.


Do you still feel that this has been handled promptly and properly?

Mary

--
Mary Shafer Retired aerospace research engineer

  #13  
Old May 10th 04, 09:11 PM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mary Shafer" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 23:39:20 -0400, "Kevin Brooks"
wrote:

"John Cook" wrote in message
...


Saying that more Iraqi's are being serviced by the electrical grid
isn't the best example you could give at the moment - Many have seen
the pictures of that Iraqi prisoner hooked up to it ;-).


Not really a laughing matter--and of course, the individuals responsible
were brought up on charges before the press even went public with that
story. A number of personnel facing courts martial, and a fair number of
more senior leaders receiving non-judicial punishment for lesser related
offenses, because a troopie did what he was supposed to do (report
improper/illegal behavior). So the end game looks like a few individuals
screwed up, are facing the consequences, and the US Army met its

obligation
to investigate and take punitive action where appropriate--not a bad

thing,
IMO.


Do you still feel that this has been handled promptly and properly?


Look at the timeline--the report of the activities in question was received
by the chain of command on 16 Jan, IIRC, and the CID kicked off its
investigation within three days. Less than four months later the first
indicif-dual is getting ready to face a courts martial. How many *civil*
criminal proceedings do you see take off this quickly?
Sounds pretty prompt to me.

Properly? Sounds like it. CID was involved from the get-go, and the
commander began a 15-6 investigation concurrently. About the same time, the
Army announced that an investigation was underway to the press (not vice
versa). Key leaders in the suspect units were removed from command
immediately. Despite the inept braying of the media (on topics related,
large and small--I just lstened to CNN's Judy Woodruff tell her viewers that
today's editorial in Army Times...will undoubtedly be read by all US
Marines, who read each and every copy...(?!)), the system is working,
promptly and apparently efficiently.

You could toss up the rather general concerns raised by the ICRC last
year...but being as they were concerned with infractions that allegedly
occured the same month we began moving into Iraq, and included such weighty
concerns as keeping prisoners in unlighted cells (when 90 plus percent of
the entire Iraqi population was sililarly without power), I am not sure how
much creedance to give that approach.

Brooks


Mary

--
Mary Shafer Retired aerospace research engineer



  #14  
Old May 11th 04, 12:39 AM
John Cook
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

More snippets of news....

It looks Like Italy is having the same problem with workshare, and are
very unhappy about it.

They too are reconsidering their participation.


cheers
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
EU as joke (modified) Cub Driver Military Aviation 241 November 17th 03 04:55 PM
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII Mike Yared Military Aviation 4 October 30th 03 03:09 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.