If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Speedbrakes for a Bonanza: Opinions?
With my Bonanza about to roll out of maintenance with its new
(overhauled) engine, I have been considering ways to preserve that investment. Recently, I came across an article discussing speedbrakes and was wondering if anyone here has experience with speedbrakes in a small aircraft. I see the main advantage being the ability to slow and/or descend without having to significantly drop power, which keeps the engine warm. If true, this would be an excellent way to maintain engine health. Looking for any comments, either pro or con, about this modification. Thanks. -- Peter |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter R." wrote in message ... With my Bonanza about to roll out of maintenance with its new (overhauled) engine, I have been considering ways to preserve that investment. Recently, I came across an article discussing speedbrakes and was wondering if anyone here has experience with speedbrakes in a small aircraft. I see the main advantage being the ability to slow and/or descend without having to significantly drop power, which keeps the engine warm. If true, this would be an excellent way to maintain engine health. Looking for any comments, either pro or con, about this modification. Thanks. Here's what John Deakin had to say at http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/182085-1.html "Some pilots spend a lot of money installing speed brakes, because they want the ability to get down faster, without pulling much power off. If I'm cruising at high altitude, and ATC wants me down, or I need to dump it through a layer of potential icing conditions, I'll put the gear down (with the 156 IAS Vlo on my Bonanza, the gear is a wonderful speed brake), pull off five or ten inches of MP, and head on down at 2,000 FPM or better. Does my engine get cold? No, because I'll enrich to peak EGT, then another 50 to ROP, and that will keep my CHTs nice and toasty. They may slowly drop a bit, but I'm not concerned about that. In other words, at lower power settings, I'm running at the "best power" point on the mixture curve for temperature control. This gives a surprising amount of temperature control, too!" And http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/182107-1.html "Just consider one of those times you've looked longingly at the ads for speed brakes. Now, let me show you why you don't need them!" -- Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Contact Steve Oxman through the WBS, he's the newest president. Steve
has speed brakes on his K model Bonanza. He'll be able to give you the straight skinny. On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:32:45 -0500, Peter R. wrote: With my Bonanza about to roll out of maintenance with its new (overhauled) engine, I have been considering ways to preserve that investment. Recently, I came across an article discussing speedbrakes and was wondering if anyone here has experience with speedbrakes in a small aircraft. I see the main advantage being the ability to slow and/or descend without having to significantly drop power, which keeps the engine warm. If true, this would be an excellent way to maintain engine health. Looking for any comments, either pro or con, about this modification. Thanks. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Peter R. wrote:
With my Bonanza about to roll out of maintenance with its new (overhauled) engine, I have been considering ways to preserve that investment. Recently, I came across an article discussing speedbrakes and was wondering if anyone here has experience with speedbrakes in a small aircraft. I see the main advantage being the ability to slow and/or descend without having to significantly drop power, which keeps the engine warm. If true, this would be an excellent way to maintain engine health. Looking for any comments, either pro or con, about this modification. Thanks. I have the Precise Flight speed brakes on my Mooney. I've never flown a Bo, so I can't comment on that. On the Mooney, I'd say they're "nice to have" but certainly not a necessity. I don't use them for high power descents, but I do use them occasionally when I misplan a descent and need to hurry up the descent, or when ATC asks for an expedited descent. They've been relatively maintenance free, but there has been the occasional "hang" when they fail to retract, usually asymmetrically. The resulting roll is easily overpowered by ailerons. The hang is corrected with cleaning and lubrication. I wouldn't look for speedbrakes if I were buying an airplane. I wouldn't install them if they weren't already on the plane. Since I do have them, I'm happy they're there. I'm not convinced shock cooling is an important issue, but that depends on your particular religious inclination, I suppose. Dave |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Butler wrote:
Peter R. wrote: With my Bonanza about to roll out of maintenance with its new (overhauled) engine, I have been considering ways to preserve that investment. Recently, I came across an article discussing speedbrakes and was wondering if anyone here has experience with speedbrakes in a small aircraft. I see the main advantage being the ability to slow and/or descend without having to significantly drop power, which keeps the engine warm. If true, this would be an excellent way to maintain engine health. Looking for any comments, either pro or con, about this modification. Thanks. I have the Precise Flight speed brakes on my Mooney. I've never flown a Bo, so I can't comment on that. On the Mooney, I'd say they're "nice to have" but certainly not a necessity. I don't use them for high power descents, but I do use them occasionally when I misplan a descent and need to hurry up the descent, or when ATC asks for an expedited descent. They've been relatively maintenance free, but there has been the occasional "hang" when they fail to retract, usually asymmetrically. The resulting roll is easily overpowered by ailerons. The hang is corrected with cleaning and lubrication. I wouldn't look for speedbrakes if I were buying an airplane. I wouldn't install them if they weren't already on the plane. Since I do have them, I'm happy they're there. I'm not convinced shock cooling is an important issue, but that depends on your particular religious inclination, I suppose. One more thing: I should have added that they are vacuum powered, so put an additional load on your vacuum pump. I have no idea how significant that is. They also add a lot of distance to your vacuum plumbing, including a bunch that's inside your wing where it is hard to inspect. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I've flown a Cessna TP206 with speed brakes in skydiving ops. Very useful
in that operation. They halve the descent time from 12,000 ft. Don't even have to remember to retract before landing as they are inop below 100kts. "Dave Butler" wrote in message news:1105471673.894646@sj-nntpcache-3... Dave Butler wrote: Peter R. wrote: With my Bonanza about to roll out of maintenance with its new (overhauled) engine, I have been considering ways to preserve that investment. Recently, I came across an article discussing speedbrakes and was wondering if anyone here has experience with speedbrakes in a small aircraft. I see the main advantage being the ability to slow and/or descend without having to significantly drop power, which keeps the engine warm. If true, this would be an excellent way to maintain engine health. Looking for any comments, either pro or con, about this modification. Thanks. I have the Precise Flight speed brakes on my Mooney. I've never flown a Bo, so I can't comment on that. On the Mooney, I'd say they're "nice to have" but certainly not a necessity. I don't use them for high power descents, but I do use them occasionally when I misplan a descent and need to hurry up the descent, or when ATC asks for an expedited descent. They've been relatively maintenance free, but there has been the occasional "hang" when they fail to retract, usually asymmetrically. The resulting roll is easily overpowered by ailerons. The hang is corrected with cleaning and lubrication. I wouldn't look for speedbrakes if I were buying an airplane. I wouldn't install them if they weren't already on the plane. Since I do have them, I'm happy they're there. I'm not convinced shock cooling is an important issue, but that depends on your particular religious inclination, I suppose. One more thing: I should have added that they are vacuum powered, so put an additional load on your vacuum pump. I have no idea how significant that is. They also add a lot of distance to your vacuum plumbing, including a bunch that's inside your wing where it is hard to inspect. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
They're not a bad idea on some aircraft, but Bonanzas, with their 154K gear
speeds, really don't need them. I also think that shock-cooling is an overrated thing, but that's another discussion. - Mark |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Matt Barrow ) wrote:
Here's what John Deakin had to say at snip Good articles. Thanks. -- Peter |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Butler ) wrote:
One more thing: I should have added that they are vacuum powered, so put an additional load on your vacuum pump. Really? Are they the first generation? The Precision Flight speedbrakes being sold now are driven by electricity. -- Peter |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Jon A. ) wrote:
Contact Steve Oxman through the WBS, he's the newest president. I'll do that. Thanks. -- Peter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Opinions on Cessna 340, 414 and 421 | john szpara | Owning | 55 | April 2nd 04 09:08 PM |
Thanks for your opinions - Going to pick up plane tomorrow!! | Larryskydives | Owning | 0 | February 13th 04 04:44 AM |
OPINIONS: THE SOLUTION | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 4 | January 7th 04 10:43 PM |
Rallye/Koliber AD's and opinions | R. Wubben | Owning | 2 | October 16th 03 05:39 AM |
Early Bonanza or Apache? | Brinks | Owning | 11 | July 16th 03 06:01 PM |