A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Congress demands 1 per cent in 5 years



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 2nd 06, 05:44 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Congress demands 1 per cent in 5 years

In 1980s Congressional testimony the FAA was told
that airmen should not get their medicals unless it could
be predicted there was less than a 1 per cent chance of a
cardiac event in the next five years. This was given as
the reason a Cessna 140 driver is held to a higher medical standard
than truck drivers, nevermind that some trucks are orders of
magnitude more dangerous to third parties than a small Cessna.

I would appreciate whatever information is available on this
testimony - preferably the full text of the discussion and
who said what.
--
Chuck Forsberg www.omen.com 503-614-0430
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications
Omen Technology Inc "The High Reliability Software"
10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 FAX 629-0665

  #2  
Old August 18th 06, 11:16 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Did Congress really ask for this?

In 1980s Congressional testimony the FAA was told
that airmen should not get their medicals unless it could
be predicted there was less than a 1 per cent chance of a
cardiac event in the next five years. This was given as
the reason a Cessna 140 driver is held to a higher medical standard
than truck drivers, nevermind that some trucks are orders of
magnitude more dangerous to third parties than a small Cessna.

I would appreciate whatever information is available on this
testimony - preferably the full text of the discussion and
who said what.

  #3  
Old August 19th 06, 02:38 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
vincent p. norris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 122
Default Did Congress really ask for this?

In 1980s Congressional testimony the FAA was told
that airmen should not get their medicals unless it could
be predicted there was less than a 1 per cent chance of a
cardiac event in the next five years.

I would appreciate whatever information is available on this
testimony - preferably the full text of the discussion and
who said what.


Go to a *research* library, such as one at the nearest university.

If you live near a STATE university, it is probably a "Depository"
library. That means the Feds "deposit" there all the stuff that pours
out of the Government Printing Office. (The one here at Penn State
even gets Sectionals, Terminal Area Charts and WACs.)

Such a library should have everything you want.

vince norris
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
American nazi pond scum, version two bushite kills bushite Naval Aviation 0 December 21st 04 10:46 PM
millionaire on the Internet... in weeks! Malcolm Austin Soaring 0 November 5th 04 11:14 PM
Boeing Boondoggle Larry Dighera Military Aviation 77 September 15th 04 02:39 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.