A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

which frequencies are all?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old April 12th 04, 02:54 AM
aaronw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 15:17:54 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:

Approach controls ARE associated with airports, that's the reason they were
created.

Let's look at an example of a middle of the road approach control facility;
Madison TRACON in Madison, Wisconsin. Madison approach serves and is
located on Truax Field in Madison. They also serve eight other airports
with SIAPs in the area, but about 85% of MSN TRACON's traffic is generated
by Truax Field. MSN TRACON was created for the purpose of handling
instrument operations at Truax Field. Once it was created it was in a
position to provide services to these other airports and does so, but it
would never have been created if Truax Field was not there. Without Truax
there would be no Madison TRACON and Chicago Center would be providing IFR
services to these other airports on a full-time basis.


I have a side question to this... Is it ever the case that an approach
is created because the combination of many small airports makes it a
good idea/worthwhile? I'm specifically thinking of Cape TRACON in
this instance. It seems to control a mismash of airports, MVY, ACK,
HYA, etc. Or maybe sometime in the past it was more tied to a
particular airport and then as traffic grew it expanded its reach?

I guess those sorts of things are pretty much only decided on the
basis of traffic volume?

aw
  #32  
Old May 11th 04, 02:54 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

aaronw wrote in message . ..

I have a side question to this... Is it ever the case that an approach
is created because the combination of many small airports makes it a
good idea/worthwhile? I'm specifically thinking of Cape TRACON in
this instance. It seems to control a mismash of airports, MVY, ACK,
HYA, etc. Or maybe sometime in the past it was more tied to a
particular airport and then as traffic grew it expanded its reach?


I believe that facility was originally created to primarily serve Otis AFB.
  #33  
Old May 11th 04, 03:38 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

aaronw wrote in message . ..

I have a side question to this... Is it ever the case that an approach
is created because the combination of many small airports makes it a
good idea/worthwhile? I'm specifically thinking of Cape TRACON in
this instance. It seems to control a mismash of airports, MVY, ACK,
HYA, etc. Or maybe sometime in the past it was more tied to a
particular airport and then as traffic grew it expanded its reach?


I believe that facility was originally created to primarily serve Otis AFB.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Scanner frequencies for Oshkosh? Greg General Aviation 1 July 21st 04 04:40 PM
Meaning of "IC" on KPHL Frequencies? [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 2 April 26th 04 04:16 PM
Howie Keefe's Topo Atlas/WAC charts & frequencies Mark Piloting 10 December 1st 03 02:36 PM
Approach Control Frequencies John General Aviation 5 October 18th 03 09:30 AM
Approach Control Frequencies John Owning 10 October 5th 03 12:16 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.