If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
CV wrote: I have vague memory about some kind of spin mode in an aerobatic plane, that was only recoverable by applying full power. Ring a bell, anyone ? Part of Jimmy Franklin's old routine (before he put the jet engine on his Waco) was an inverted flat spin. When he began his recovery, you could hear the engine going from idle to near full power several times. George Patterson If you don't tell lies, you never have to remember what you said. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
G.R. Patterson III wrote:
Toks Desalu wrote: And I wonder why they FAA removed spin training as requirement in early years? They removed it because many people were dying during spin recovery training. They decided to teach people to avoid stalls and recover promptly from inadvertent stalls, because an aircraft will not spin unless it stalls first. The FAA feels that the reduced fatality rate proves they made the correct decision. Canada removed spin training in the late 1990's for the same reason. We kept it for decades after the U.S. gave it up, but our stall/spin fatality rate was actually higher than the rate in the U.S. By the time I did my PPL in 2002, spin training was already just a memory. Transport Canada produced a report on the issue, basically concluding that stall/spin accidents almost always happen too low for recovery, and since practicing spin recoveries was killing the occasional student and instructor, it made no sense to keep it on the syllabus. One interest artifact of all that, though, is that since spin training was part of the Canadian PPL until the late 1990's, my unscientific observation is that Canadian flying schools are much less likely than American schools to own Piper Cherokees/Warriors/Archers, since most Pipers from the 1970's on do not allow intentional spins. All the best, David |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Well, if i can have my 2 cents....
Now, the show prompted me to consider taking some sort of spinning and recovering training. Am I being overacting or paranoid? I am not an airplane pilot, but a glider pilot, and I have done my training in France, even if I have flown a couple of hours in the US. In my training, spin was mandatory, and my instructor, before my solo, asked me to do 3 full revolutions in a spin, and exit on a pre-determined axe. Certainly, a glider is less impressive than an heavy plane and rotate relatively slower, but, that's not the point. When you fly sailplane, while you spiral in a lift, you are constanly flirting with stalling, as the goal is to fly at the maximum lift incidence/speed, which is a couple knots above stall, and when you are busy trying to center as well as possible that anemic thermal, your speed is not always perfect. All that to say that I stalled (dissymetric, being in turn) many times with my Standard Austria ( not the SHK ), as this sailplane is known to not like too much slow speed, but i NEVER did more than an half rotation, losing less than a hundred feet each time, as I do believe that if you know the signs annonciating a stall, and react immediatly, most of the time you will not even stall. (I also did many 300 kilometers circuits with my Austria) All the above to say that, maybe, your best training would be to fly sailplane, as you will know how to get out of a stall as fast as possible, and flirt with the limits a lot more than you are used to in your airplane. Bernard |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Elwood Dowd" wrote in message ... Criminey, are snuff films legal for TV now? There is no such thing as a snuff film. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Some airplanes, including some trainers, will not recover from a fully
developed spin. Nearly all have had to demonstrate the ability to recover from an incipient spin, the Cirrus being a notable exception. Spin training is of most value to instructors, and even there the practical benefit is that it gives the instructors enough confidence to keep most of them from always grabbing the controls away from the students. I think it is also valuable for students who are afraid of stalls and stall recoveries. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
In article , tony
wrote: Never having jumped out of a perfectly good airplane, nor having had people bail out of my M20J, I'm ignorant re carrying jumpers. Do they belt themselves in place during take off and climb? The belts are there, but it is probably left to the individual as to actually using them. Once airbore the jumpers can usually get rather quickly (practice, practice, practice). We had a bird nest in the engine compartment of our club 180 early one Spring. As the plane was climbing to altitude with the first load of the day, the nest began to smolder and smoke began waifting into the cabin. The pilot, scanning the panel and looking down towards the rudder peddals, started to say, "Boys, I think we got a ..." By that time, all five jumpers were out the door and gone! |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 05 May 2004 14:00:23 GMT, "G.R. Patterson III"
wrote: Part of Jimmy Franklin's old routine (before he put the jet engine on his Waco) was an inverted flat spin. When he began his recovery, you could hear the engine going from idle to near full power several times. George Patterson I think, not positive, but I think that what he was doing was attempting to blast air across the rudder to get it enough authority to stop the spin. I saw him do that at the airshow at Lebanon NH a number of years ago before he put the jet engine on his Waco, and I swear he nearly did not make it out of his flat inverted spin. He'd had other maneuvers that he pulled out with far more altitude to spare but this time it really did not look good. You could see him horsing the controls and the engine went to full power and idle a number of times and he was really getting low. I didn't see how he could recover from the spin and still roll upright in time to pull out. He did, just. He was so low that he actually dipped down into the slight drainage swale beside the runway as he pulled out and it was obvious to me he did not plan it that way. What I mean is he only just got the airplane upright and horsed the stick back immediately. He might have some within a few feet of the ground. It could just be me, but all the maneuvers after that appeared ragged and occured at a much higher altitude. He seemed shaken. The airshow was already shocking in that a woman pilot in a Pitt's collided with a jumper and both died. The Pitts disintegrated and went down and crashed beside the river and the parachutist was decapitated. His body floated overhead dripping blood along the way and landed smack in front of the crowd. I missed the collision. I'd seen the act before and wasn't paying attention as the jumpers left their jump plane. Just saw the particles of the airplane hanging in the air from the collision. The woman and two other Pitts pilots were supposed to circle the parachutists as they came in together. Only the pilots did not know that a third guy was added to the jumpers, or at least I heard she did not know. They saw two dive away and turned in to begin their circling. Then the third jumped. Corky Scott |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
so much for that preflight...
BT "EDR" wrote in message ... In article , tony wrote: Never having jumped out of a perfectly good airplane, nor having had people bail out of my M20J, I'm ignorant re carrying jumpers. Do they belt themselves in place during take off and climb? The belts are there, but it is probably left to the individual as to actually using them. Once airbore the jumpers can usually get rather quickly (practice, practice, practice). We had a bird nest in the engine compartment of our club 180 early one Spring. As the plane was climbing to altitude with the first load of the day, the nest began to smolder and smoke began waifting into the cabin. The pilot, scanning the panel and looking down towards the rudder peddals, started to say, "Boys, I think we got a ..." By that time, all five jumpers were out the door and gone! |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
The crash the original poster described was a Cessna 205 (the small
tail, underpowered 206). Yup...dunno why I was thinking it was a C-210. Here is the accident report. http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?e...08X07972&key=1 -John *You are nothing until you have flown a Douglas, Lockheed, Grumman or North American* |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Spin Training | Captain Wubba | Piloting | 25 | April 12th 04 02:11 PM |
Cessna 150 Price Outlook | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 80 | October 16th 03 02:18 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |
Accelerated spin questions | John Harper | Aerobatics | 7 | August 15th 03 07:08 PM |