If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
Is an IPC a substitute for 6 approaches?
Yes, but it is just the same as the FAA page, same content.
Still looking for all the comment and explanation pages. "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message nk.net... | | "Jim Macklin" wrote in message | news:B6GJg.6498$SZ3.2538@dukeread04... | | Give that link again, I'll try it again. | | | http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text...l=%2Findex.tpl | | |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
Is an IPC a substitute for 6 approaches?
"Jim Macklin" wrote in message
news:lKIJg.6515$SZ3.5920@dukeread04... Since you seem to think that the regulations need to be re-written. No, I never said that. If anything, I think it would make slightly more sense for the FAA to keep the existing wording and adhere to it. But I don't think it matters much either way. --Gary "Gary Drescher" wrote in message . .. | "Jim Macklin" wrote in message | news:L6GJg.6502$SZ3.992@dukeread04... | Then I suggest that you write the FAA and your congressman | to require that the FAA clarify, in the regulations, what | has been the regulation, policy and interpretation of FAR | 61.57, so that you're pleased with the resulting text. | Understand that nothing will change, just an expenditure of | a few $100,000 for public hearings, and printing. | | Right, so why would I bother to make that request? Why do you suggest it? | | --Gary | | |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
Is an IPC a substitute for 6 approaches?
They do follow their rules on 61.57. The only change has
been to tighten up on the content of an IPC [and the name change]. "Gary Drescher" wrote in message . .. | "Jim Macklin" wrote in message | news:lKIJg.6515$SZ3.5920@dukeread04... | Since you seem to think that the regulations need to be | re-written. | | No, I never said that. If anything, I think it would make slightly more | sense for the FAA to keep the existing wording and adhere to it. But I don't | think it matters much either way. | | --Gary | | | "Gary Drescher" wrote in message | . .. | | "Jim Macklin" wrote | in message | | news:L6GJg.6502$SZ3.992@dukeread04... | | Then I suggest that you write the FAA and your | congressman | | to require that the FAA clarify, in the regulations, | what | | has been the regulation, policy and interpretation of | FAR | | 61.57, so that you're pleased with the resulting text. | | Understand that nothing will change, just an expenditure | of | | a few $100,000 for public hearings, and printing. | | | | Right, so why would I bother to make that request? Why do | you suggest it? | | | | --Gary | | | | | | | | |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
Is an IPC a substitute for 6 approaches?
"Jim Macklin" wrote in message
news7JJg.6518$SZ3.3885@dukeread04... They do follow their rules on 61.57. Yes Jim, I get that you think so. But here's a constructive suggestion, in the event that you'd like to make progress on this question. You've mentioned you have friends who are lawyers. Why not show some of them my message of 8/25 12:47PM (the one with the "not-P unless Q" analysis that you refuse to address, even though it's the crux of the whole disagreement). If they agree with me, perhaps they can explain the argument to you. Alternatively, if they disagree with me, perhaps they could say why and you could post their analysis here. --Gary |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
Is an IPC a substitute for 6 approaches?
Why address a premise that is wrong. Why bother lawyers, it
is your argument, you disagree with the answer you've been given. It is up to you to resolve the issue. You contact the FAA Regional office and ask for a legal opinion. They have staff that will do that for you. "Gary Drescher" wrote in message ... | "Jim Macklin" wrote in message | news7JJg.6518$SZ3.3885@dukeread04... | They do follow their rules on 61.57. | | Yes Jim, I get that you think so. But here's a constructive suggestion, in | the event that you'd like to make progress on this question. You've | mentioned you have friends who are lawyers. Why not show some of them my | message of 8/25 12:47PM (the one with the "not-P unless Q" analysis that you | refuse to address, even though it's the crux of the whole disagreement). If | they agree with me, perhaps they can explain the argument to you. | Alternatively, if they disagree with me, perhaps they could say why and you | could post their analysis here. | | --Gary | | |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
Is an IPC a substitute for 6 approaches?
Gary, I have just been lurking this thread. As it winds down (we hope), I
will just comment that you are absolutely correct, regarding what the words of the regulation actually say, independent of how they may be applied or interpreted or intended by the FAA. I have beat this horse a bit from time to time myself. Stan "Gary Drescher" wrote in message ... "Jim Macklin" wrote in message news7JJg.6518$SZ3.3885@dukeread04... They do follow their rules on 61.57. Yes Jim, I get that you think so. But here's a constructive suggestion, in the event that you'd like to make progress on this question. You've mentioned you have friends who are lawyers. Why not show some of them my message of 8/25 12:47PM (the one with the "not-P unless Q" analysis that you refuse to address, even though it's the crux of the whole disagreement). If they agree with me, perhaps they can explain the argument to you. Alternatively, if they disagree with me, perhaps they could say why and you could post their analysis here. --Gary |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GNS480 missing some LPV approaches | Dave Butler | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | October 27th 05 02:24 PM |
FS2004 approaches, ATC etc | henri Arsenault | Simulators | 14 | September 27th 03 12:48 PM |
Logging instrument approaches | Slav Inger | Instrument Flight Rules | 33 | July 27th 03 11:00 PM |
Garmin Behind the Curve on WAAS GPS VNAV Approaches | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 18th 03 01:43 PM |