If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
The airlines have been flying the RNAV overlays of the conventional
terminal routes on an ILS for over 20 years. What the airlines do is irrelevant to General Aviation operations. They're using different equipment and operating under different rules. You don't need to be checking underlying nav facilities during such an operation. That's your opinion, for which you have been unable to offer supporting evidence. The AIM says differently. It sounds like your both anal retentive You mean "you're". ;-) Is it anal retentive to want to follow the law? Ok, guilty. and spring-loaded to being unreasonably argumentative I must admit that I find it annoying and insulting when someone tries to pass off a series of irrelevancies and non sequiturs as an explanation. I usually associate this with someone hiding a lack of knowledge. yet you are unwilling to do your own leg work to get to the folks in the FAA who can answer your unnecessary question. This is my own leg work. ;-) I have also exchanged emails with the folks at Garmin, who were also unable to offer a coherent explanation as to why I could use their equipment in this fashion. Finding someone knowledgable at the FAA is a real chore. There also I run into people who try to "explain" things to me, only to find out they know less than I do on the subject. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|