A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Stand up in Court?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old February 27th 06, 11:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Stand up in Court?


"Michael Ware" wrote in message
m...
General question here. I am not at all familiar with the regs regarding
homebuilts or experimental aircraft. Do they have to have an annual
inspection to remain airworthy?
If so, I am thinking let the thing go out of annual before you sell it.
Make
the buyer responsible for arranging whatever is needed to get everything
current. Hopefully it would shift enough responsibilty to the new owner
and
his A&P if some failure were to get someone hurt or killed to keep you out
of it.


Homebuilts require an annual inspection. If you built it you are still the
builder of record and if you have assets worth going after you will probably
join the list on the lawsuit. Quite often is is not who is at fault but who
has significant assets. Lawyers don't care who is at fault only who has
money.


  #22  
Old February 28th 06, 09:13 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Stand up in Court?

This is true. A company I know was sued after a claim was made that one of
their parts failed, causing the deaths of two small children. Tests showed
that the part had been improperly installed (which could have caused a
failure), but did not fail.

The insurance company settled for over $4 million.

The worst part is that now the product liability premiums for this product
line now cost more that the profit made on the line, however dropping the
line is impractical, as they will still need to maintain the liability
insurance for the products already sold.

"Dave Stadt" wrote in message news:6mMMf.17004
Lawyers don't care who is at fault only who has money.




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Court rejects suit against US military flights Otis Willie Military Aviation 1 September 19th 04 12:11 AM
Japan court rules for US military chopper flights Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 16th 04 10:09 PM
THOMAS MOORER, EX-JOINT CHIEFS CHAIR DIES Ewe n0 who Naval Aviation 4 February 21st 04 09:01 PM
THOMAS MOORER, EX-JOINT CHIEFS CHAIR DIES Ewe n0 who Military Aviation 2 February 12th 04 12:52 AM
Pilot's court martial may be delayed Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 January 22nd 04 02:10 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.