If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Weather Article In EAA Sport Pilot Mag
This posting is in response to the "weather watch" article in the December
issue of EAA's Sport Pilot Magazine. I hope you forgive the cross-posting to these three groups. Obviously, the article was not meant to be real deep on detail, but there are a few significant statements and implications that warrant some discussion. 1. "Warm air can hold more water vapour than cooler air so cooler air will reach its dew point ... sooner" Whether the air is warm or cool is not the issue. The issue is the spread between the temperature and the dew point. Warm air with a small dewpoint spread is much more dangerous than cooler air with the same spread. *Because* warm air (say: above 20 or 25 deg C) can hold more moisture (and therefore has more moisture to condense), the visibility will start to lower with dewpoint spreads as much as 3 or 4 degrees. When the temperature is down around minus 10 degrees C or less, visibility rarely deteriorates until the dewpoint spread is less than 1 or 2 degrees C. 2. "Humid air rises relative to dry air because of the lightness of water vapour as a gas." That may be technically true, but air-masses tend to have more-or-less the same humidity characteristics throughout the entire air mass. So there is no "relative to dry air" for the supposed convection to take place. Humid air tends to exhibit instability more than dry air in practice... because humid air, in rising, will reach the condensation point sooner. Thereafter it will not cool as rapidly, and is more likely to remain warmer than the rest of the environmental air, and hence more buoyant. Dry air if often the result of a high pressure system, which produces a general subsidence in the area, and is not at all conducive to rising anything. 3. "A unit of air rising will cool 5.5 deg F per 1,000 feet of altitude in relation to the larger mass of air surrounding it, until it reaches temperature equilibrium. If this rising air does so at a rate less than the DALR (dry adiabatic Lapse Rate), the air is stable. Air is unstable when rising at a rate greater than the DALR." I thought air rose *AT* the DALR, not "less than" or "greater than". I am sure the statement was *supposed* to say something like.... "...after rising, if the resultant temperature of the risen air is less than the ambient temperature of the environment at that level, then the air is stable. Air is unstable if the resultant temperature of the risen air is greater than the ambient temperature of the environment at that level." 4. In a later paragraph: "Air rising at or slower than the MALR (moist adiabatic lapse rate) is more stable than air rising at or faster than DALR". WHAT? I have no idea what she is trying to say. The MALR and DALR have nothing to do with speed. And if we are talking about the speed of temperature change, the MALR is ALWAYS "slower" than the DALR, and in any case, the air is either cooling *AT* the MALR or *AT* the DALR. 5. There is the description of the famous formula for determining cloud height from dewpoint spread, along with the statement: "It indicates changes in base heights taken over time; that is, are the clouds lowering?" This formula is useful primarily for the determination of the bases of *cumulus* clouds in fair weather, and possibly stratocumulus following a cold front. Be *very, very* careful trying to apply it to any other meteorological situation. In fact... DON'T! 6. In a sidebar on Density Altitude is the statement: "Even though you may think that humid air is more dense than dry air, the fact is that the molecules of water suspended in the air force other gas molecules farther apart to make room for them. So, even though humid air may weigh more per unit volume, there is actually less air for your wing and propeller to use." In humid air, the molecules of water replace the molecules of air. Since air is mostly nitrogen and oxygen, whose atomic masses are 28 and 32 respectively, and water has an atomic mass of 18... every replaced molecule results in a lighter and lighter air mass. Humid air does never, Never, NEVER "weigh more per unit volume" than dry air. Your wing and propeller uses molecules of water vapour just the same as the molecules of any other gas. It is just that these molecules happen to be lighter, thus are easier to displace, thus provide less "reaction", and therefore less lift. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Sport Pilot inconsistency | frustrated flier | Home Built | 16 | November 18th 04 08:29 AM |
sport pilot humor | Occom | Home Built | 0 | April 9th 04 04:22 PM |
Sport Pilot Leaves DOT for OMB, Latest News | Fitzair4 | Home Built | 3 | December 25th 03 02:49 AM |
Sport Pilot Seminar & Fly-in | Gilan | Home Built | 0 | October 11th 03 05:21 AM |