If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 02:40:55 GMT, "The Enlightenment"
wrote in Message-Id: : He had an horizontal tailplane and elevator, he had twin air[s]crews that could bee varied to change direction and he had roll control via weight shifting (not a good method but it works for hang gliders and it worked for Lilienthaal.) But what of the (arguably excessive) weight of Weisskopf's machine which included a separate engine to power the wheels? While his propellers are criticized for being inefficient it has to be remembered that he accelerated his vehicle via engaging road wheels: a method that must be near 100% efficient. If the motor which powered the wheels were able to propel Weisskopf's craft to flying speed (doubtful), it would have been forced to rely upon those alleged inefficient propellers to sustain its flight. I don't discredit the Wright Brothers, the thoroughness of their work is excellent and they clearly had got it right by 1905. By 1910 successful flight was going to be inevitable: the advances in engine power to weight ratio meant that the power was finally available to realize it. It was Glen Curtiss, the motorcycle racer and engine builder, who won aviation's first speed race at Reims, France, on August 29, 1909: http://www.esparacing.com/Air%20Raci...ain%20menu.htm |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|