If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Greg Esres wrote in message . ..
That's not always the case. And to make matters worse, the pilot has no way of knowing without direct knowledge. When would that not be the case? And if it were the case, the pilot must certainly know. If you don't hear the words "radar contact" followed by a heading, then you're not being vectored. Greg, Now that I think about it some more, I think the issue is that some VFR towers (which won't tell you "radar contact") can relay radar vectors from the radar approach control which serves them. But sitting on the ground, I have no way of knowing whether Whatzits Approach meets the criteria (whatever they are) to provide radar vectors to Podunk Tower. If I hear "fly heading XXX, intercept the ABC 188 degree radial" is that a vector or a heading? Beats me. We've sure gotten headings like that from VFR towers which I'm pretty durn sure were way too far from a radar facility to have coverage close to the ground, and in fact we didn't hear "radar contact" until we were above 3,000 ft. So I don't think they were vectors. They were headings. OTOH "fly heading XXX" from our local VFR tower which sits under the STL class B might be vectors. Dunno. I think the rule has to be, if there's something to hit and departure instructions don't include the obstacle DP, Ask. Cheers, Sydney |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Newps wrote: wrote: And, at a mountain airport, until you reach MVA on departure, even the radar controller and you are in a obstacle-clearance haze. Mountain airport, non mountain airport it doesn't matter. There is no haze. Well, how do you determine where the obstacles are below the MVA. Dig out a sectional chart? There is a whole lot of haze. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Newps wrote: Greg Esres wrote: Tower guys don't give headings, they give vectors Nonsense. Vectors require radar contact, and lots of towers aren't associated at all with any radar facility. Vectors do not require radar contact when issued with your takeoff clearance. There are rules as to how soon after you takeoff that you must be seen on the radar, otherwise the controller cannot vector you. The tower itself does not have to have radar to give you a vector. If the approach control can see aircraft within a half a mile after takeoff they may have the tower give you a vector. That is a contradiction in terms. If the tower controller can't see you on radar he cannot vector you. He can only assign a heading. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Ron Rosenfeld wrote: Well it should be the case whenever you receive heading instructions from the tower that they either do not conflict with an ODP, or that they have been assessed for a DVA. These vectors are below the MVA and a 200 f/nm climb rate is assumed unless ATC obtains your concurrence with a higher minimum rate of climb. "Should" is the operative word. DVAs simply do not fit at most mountain area airports. There wasn't even any DVA criteria until recently in TERPs. But, those criteria simply don't fit at places like Reno, Salt Lake, and Las Vegas. 200 feet per mile is a fiction unless you are in Omaha. ;-) It has not always been the case in the past. MRY as recently as 1999 was one facility where, at that time, they were issuing instructions in conflict with an ODP. Specifically they were vectoring folk to the east (towards some high mountains). I think this was changed when it was pointed out to them. Would be interesting to know whether it's really changed. They still don't have the most promint close-in obstacles on their MVA video map and, although, this has been brought to their attention at Industry/FAA meetings, Air Traffic Service simply goes into the bunker mode. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
also that flying the ODP is at the pilot's prerogative. There is no
requirement to "notify" ATC and they had better protect the appropriate airspace if they are doing their job correctly. But it's an open question of what "pilot's prerogative" means. That doesn't necessarily mean that the route is automatically protected. The whole reason I called the Sante Fe tower was to get an answer to this particular question, but as soon as I mentioned the words "pilot's prerogative", the controller blurted out "yes, but...." and proceed to tell me about the hypothetical situation I described to you. But anyway, I assure you that I remember his opinion on the matter very clearly; the only thing vaguely remembered is the scenario he set up. Still, you'd better wait for Bill English or Scott Dunham to respond to your AVSIG question before you become too confident about what ATC's responsibility is. I'm interested in their responses too. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
VFR towers (which won't tell you "radar contact") can relay radar
vectors from the radar approach control which serves them. I can buy the idea of a relayed vector, but the person who provided the vector still must see you on radar. When the aircraft is sitting on the ground, approach control can't see it and therefore can't vector it. Consider that if you take off with the heading and start to wander into some obstacle, tower won't be able to do anything about it (because they won't know) and neither will the approach control until they get you on radar, which will happen at various altitudes, depending on where you're departing from. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Hmmm, just be make things clear (I hope)...
Can you explain what your background is on this subject? I haven't seen your name before. The vector...originates in...the IFR facility (radar approach control or center) and is *relayed* to the aircraft by the tower. Nah, that doesn't work for me. The radar facility doesn't have you on radar either, because you haven't left the ground, so they can't vector you either. Again, the most significant way in which this heading differs from a vector is the lack of obstacle protection. If I have to climb 10,000 feet before radar can see me, who is providing obstacle protection? |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
it's turning into a ****ing contest
Maybe, but that's assuming you think it's a distinction without a difference. Just as misunderstanding what the term "established" means has killed some people, so too has the confusion between vectors and no-vectors, according to many articles I've read. Sloppy use of the term "vector" can lead to a sloppy understanding of who is providing terrain separation. The first step is proper use of the term, IMO. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Roy Smith wrote, "... Whether or not the controller goofed in reading me my
clearance or listening to my readback, I'm now convinced I goofed too. ..." I try to record all communications so I can go back, if I want, and hear what was actually said. Sometimes it's as I remember, sometimes not. Jon |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPS approaches with Center | Dan Luke | Instrument Flight Rules | 104 | October 22nd 03 09:42 PM |
IFR Routing Toronto to Windsor (CYTZ - CYQG) | Rob Pesan | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | October 7th 03 01:50 PM |
required readback on clearance | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 15 | September 17th 03 04:33 PM |
Picking up a Clearance Airborne | Brad Z | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | August 29th 03 01:31 AM |
Big John Bites Dicks (Security Clearance) | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 27 | August 21st 03 12:40 AM |