A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

5 dead after crash at "fly-in" community runway



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 27th 08, 02:11 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
john
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 23
Default 5 dead after crash at "fly-in" community runway

http://www.mysuncoast.com/Global/sto...av=menu577_2_1

No mention of the NTSB report. My suspicion is that the "pilot"
failed to gain sufficient airspeed to maintain flight. :-)
  #2  
Old January 27th 08, 03:13 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
D Ramapriya
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 115
Default 5 dead after crash at "fly-in" community runway

On Jan 27, 6:11 pm, john wrote:
http://www.mysuncoast.com/Global/sto...av=menu577_2_1

No mention of the NTSB report. My suspicion is that the "pilot"
failed to gain sufficient airspeed to maintain flight. :-)



Sorry John but pointing to a story of the loss of the lives of five
young souls with what's essentially a flippant remark isn't comme il
faut.

Ramapriya
  #3  
Old January 27th 08, 06:52 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,232
Default 5 dead after crash at "fly-in" community runway

D Ramapriya wrote:
On Jan 27, 6:11 pm, john wrote:
http://www.mysuncoast.com/Global/sto...av=menu577_2_1

No mention of the NTSB report. My suspicion is that the "pilot"
failed to gain sufficient airspeed to maintain flight. :-)



Sorry John but pointing to a story of the loss of the lives of five
young souls with what's essentially a flippant remark isn't comme il
faut.


True, but the story had no business being posted here in the first place.
  #4  
Old January 28th 08, 11:36 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Spam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default 5 dead after crash at "fly-in" community runway

john wrote:
http://www.mysuncoast.com/Global/sto...av=menu577_2_1

No mention of the NTSB report. My suspicion is that the "pilot"
failed to gain sufficient airspeed to maintain flight. :-)



Yea, just some kids drag racing on an airport now imagine if they were on the
street!!!!

____________

5 dead after crash at "fly-in" community runway

Associated Press - January 26, 2008 6:24 PM ET

OCALA, Fla. (AP) - Florida Highway Patrol says five young men are dead today
after a car they were riding in crashed after traveling off an airport runway.

The runway is at the exclusive "fly-in" community of Jumbolair Aviation Estates.

The crash at the community, which is also the home of actor John Travolta,
happened at about 3:45 a.m.

According to a preliminary FHP investigation, a 2008 gray BMW with 5 occupants,
ages 18 to 20, was traveling at a high rate of speed on the airstrip.

The victims have been identified as 18-year-old Joshua D. Ammirato of Fairfield;
19-year-old Dustin J. Dawe also of Fairfield; 19-year-old James Devon Hime of
Anthony; and 19-year-old Jacob James Casey and 20-year-old Isaac Rubin, both of
Ocala.

4 of them were former students at North Marion High School. Casey graduated from
Trinity Catholic High School. He went on to play football for Jacksonville
University.

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not
be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  #5  
Old January 29th 08, 04:19 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 684
Default 5 dead after crash at "fly-in" community runway

On Jan 28, 7:09*am, James Robinson wrote:
Spam
wrote:

Yea, just some kids drag racing on an airport now imagine if they were
on the street!!!!


That wasn't just any old drag race. *They were driving daddy's brand new
BMW M5, purchased just 2 months ago. *That car has a 507 HP V-10 engine
coupled to a 7 speed transmission. *Base price just under $85,000.

The driver, who was 18, had been on a discussion forum that evening
asking about disconnecting the car's stability control to increase
performance, and complaining that when the transmission was upshifted at
140 mph, it didn't seem to be very crisp:

http://www.ocala.com/article/2008012...35/1001/NEWS01

Obviously, he had been driving that fast before, likely on public
highways.

One report suggested that they had topped 160 mph on the runway before
the accident.

The description of the accident says there were skid marks just before
the end of the runway, where it appeared the car skewed, and that the car
went airborne as it left the end of the runway, eventually colliding with
an oak tree 200 feet beyond the runway. *The end of the runway is 85 feet
above the surrounding ground, and the car was reported to have hit the
oak tree 15 feet above the ground. *A quick calculation says that they
were traveling about 75 mph as they ran off the end of the runway.

Early news reports included a comment that they weren't sure if the
occupants were wearing their seatbelts. *Anyone looking at what little
remained of the car wouldn't have bothered asking that question. *They
must have a cookie-cutter formula for reporting on highway accidents that
includes that question. *Just like they ask if aircraft flying VFR filed
a flight plan when reporting on aircraft accidents.

Obviously, there would be a tremendous sense of grief for the five
families that lost their loved ones in this accident. *While the accident
was likely caused by youthful overexuberance, perhaps there are some
lessons that can be pondered by pilots:

- Think twice before doing anything that starts with any phrase similar
to: "Watch this!"

- Don't expect your aircraft to handle the same with five large people in
it as it would when you are flying alone. (The occupants of the car were
all on high school wrestling teams, suggesting they were perhaps heavier
than average. *With 800 additional pounds, braking distances from high
speed would have been significantly extended.)

- Be conservative, and don't try risky maneuvers with low hours on any
new aircraft.

- Before trying any high performance tricks, first get appropriate
training, and only do them in areas that are appropriate.


- Make sure you actually have wings attached before attempting to take
off.

- Start braking BEFORE you reach the point of no return on the runway.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Phrase "landing runway" vs. "cleared to land" Robert M. Gary Piloting 168 February 5th 08 05:32 PM
Phrase "landing runway" vs. "cleared to land" Robert M. Gary Instrument Flight Rules 137 February 5th 08 05:32 PM
Saturday 072807 in Oshkosh Pt 5 - the Warbird Show [5/5] - "You smoke up the runway, you taxi in it--dem's da rules, bub.jpg" yEnc (1/1) Just Plane Noise[_2_] Aviation Photos 1 July 31st 07 05:26 PM
How can we "fix" LEX to prevent wrong runway selection everywhere? Jim Carter Instrument Flight Rules 22 October 8th 06 04:31 PM
Tried to Call it "Runway 7" today... Jay Honeck Piloting 34 October 21st 05 05:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.