If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
slowest top speed?
I'm doing research on the speed distribution of homebuilts. It's easy
to find published data on the fast airplanes, but I'm having a hard time finding anything on the slowest. Anyone have a suggestion? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
("Dan Bond" wrote)
I'm doing research on the speed distribution of homebuilts. It's easy to find published data on the fast airplanes, but I'm having a hard time finding anything on the slowest. Anyone have a suggestion? For a slow 'high-end' speed example, a PPC (Powered Parachute) will max out in the 26 mph range. http://www.powerchutes.com/intro.asp Montblack |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Dan Bond wrote:
I'm doing research on the speed distribution of homebuilts. It's easy to find published data on the fast airplanes, but I'm having a hard time finding anything on the slowest. Anyone have a suggestion? Depends on your definition of homebuilts. Some of the MacCready human powered craft were 10 to 11 MPH. Mike |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
pittss1c wrote: Dan Bond wrote: I'm doing research on the speed distribution of homebuilts. It's easy to find published data on the fast airplanes, but I'm having a hard time finding anything on the slowest. Anyone have a suggestion? Depends on your definition of homebuilts. Some of the MacCready human powered craft were 10 to 11 MPH. Mike Of couse if you define it as ground speed there is no trick at all in getting negative ground speed, just fly into a head wind strong enough. I vaguely recall seeing a report somewhere, somewhen where someone actually landed backwards. Harry K |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
In article .com,
Harry K wrote: pittss1c wrote: Dan Bond wrote: I'm doing research on the speed distribution of homebuilts. It's easy to find published data on the fast airplanes, but I'm having a hard time finding anything on the slowest. Anyone have a suggestion? Depends on your definition of homebuilts. Some of the MacCready human powered craft were 10 to 11 MPH. Mike Of couse if you define it as ground speed there is no trick at all in getting negative ground speed, just fly into a head wind strong enough. I vaguely recall seeing a report somewhere, somewhen where someone actually landed backwards. My father -- many years ago -- saw somebody in a Piper Cub (*NOT* a Super Cub, the one with the little engine) flying into headwinds that were approximately the _cruise_ speed of said craft. The guy was on final coming in, when the winds kicked up and _stayed_ up. There he is, a few hundred feet off the end of the runway, and pretty much 'parked' in mid air. Some 20+ minutes later, he's managed to get to the runway, and gets down to 0 AGL, but the problem is "then what?" Start to throttle down, and she starts rolling backwards. As the story is told, the pilot, went back 'airborne', fought his way over to the hanger area, and made a 'vertical' landing in the lee of one of the hangers. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I've heard tell of a similar situation with WWII-era cadets flying
Stearmans in high winds. So the story goes, the wind kicked up while the flight was out. When they came back, the aircraft couldn't get down and stay down. Crews were sent out to grab the handles on the wingtips and aft fuselage, haul them down, and walk them back to the flightline. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On 10 Aug 2005 09:26:33 -0700, "CB" wrote:
I've heard tell of a similar situation with WWII-era cadets flying Stearmans in high winds. So the story goes, the wind kicked up while the flight was out. When they came back, the aircraft couldn't get down and stay down. Crews were sent out to grab the handles on the wingtips and aft fuselage, haul them down, and walk them back to the flightline. It wasn't just one situation, the handhold were there in the bottom wings of the Stearman's specifically for the ground crews to hang onto to bring in the pilots in their airplanes in order to prevent them from tipping over in the wind when they turned crosswind while taxiing. Many of the fields, or at least the one my father had his primary flight training, was just a big field. You flew overhead, noted the windsock direction and landed into the wind. If the wind was light, you taxied in paying proper attention to use of ailerons and elevator to keep the wings level and not nose over. When the wind was higher, ground crew were stationed out at the field and they'd run up once the airplane was stopped and hang on to the wings using the handholds cut into the wingtips. Other airplanes had them too. I took apart a Waco UPF-7 wings which also had handholds built into it's wingtips. The wingtip around the handhold was filled in with solid Balsa. Corky Scott |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I am not referring to ground speed... 10-11 is airspeed. (which is why I
found it relevant) Mike "Harry K" wrote in message oups.com... pittss1c wrote: Dan Bond wrote: I'm doing research on the speed distribution of homebuilts. It's easy to find published data on the fast airplanes, but I'm having a hard time finding anything on the slowest. Anyone have a suggestion? Depends on your definition of homebuilts. Some of the MacCready human powered craft were 10 to 11 MPH. Mike Of couse if you define it as ground speed there is no trick at all in getting negative ground speed, just fly into a head wind strong enough. I vaguely recall seeing a report somewhere, somewhen where someone actually landed backwards. Harry K |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
The extremely low speeds (10 to 11 mph) were absolutely necessary, as
MacCready figured out. Since drag increases as a square of airspeed, the lowest possible speeds were necessary in order to fly at all - on the 1/4 sustained horsepower available from human muscles. I thought his flyers were brilliant in both design and exicution. Richard |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Corben Junior Ace with an A-65...75 MPH cruise, Vne of 126...couldn't
hit that going straight down with both wings ripped off Scott Dan Bond wrote: I'm doing research on the speed distribution of homebuilts. It's easy to find published data on the fast airplanes, but I'm having a hard time finding anything on the slowest. Anyone have a suggestion? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Landing and T/O distances (Was Cold War ALternate Basing) | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 3 | August 13th 04 12:18 PM |
Va and turbulent air penetration speed. | Doug | Instrument Flight Rules | 70 | January 11th 04 08:35 PM |
Va and turbulent air penetration speed. | Doug | Owning | 69 | January 11th 04 08:35 PM |
Speed Astir | Guy Acheson | Soaring | 0 | December 11th 03 02:24 AM |
New Film: The Need For Speed - Going to war on drugs | Phil Carpenter | Military Aviation | 0 | July 23rd 03 07:43 AM |