If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
what was your exact instructions from the tower, its usually something like
cherokee xxx cleared for the LOC runways 27, maintain 5000 untill established on the LOC if you were told to maintain a altitude untill established, then as soon as you were established on the LOC you could decend per your glideslope needle. are you doing your training alone or with an instructor? I would suggest doing most of this training with an instructor so that you pass your check ride. Chris Brooks wrote: I am training in the maryland area. I was cleared for an ILS approach to runway 27 at HGR the other day. Here is a plate: http://204.108.4.16/d-tpp/0406/05114I27.PDF I was about 17 miles out at 5000 feet when I got cleared for the approach. My question is, when can I descend to 4000 feet? Anyone? |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
At 17 miles point, he's not on a published portion of the approach,
since he's not doing the hold-in-lieu of PT. He should have received a crossing restriction until HAIGS, since the vector did not place him on the localizer within the published portion of the approach. Approach could have provided a radar initial and cleared him to 4000 until HAIGS, but without that clearance, he's stuck at the last assigned altitude until reaching HAIGS. At that point he can descend to 4000 if he needs a course reversal, or 2900 if he continues straight-in. I'm sure 4000 is fine at that point, because that's what the hold-in-lieu uses, but from a procedural (TERPS and ATC) standpoint the only "straight-in" procedure track at 17 miles is a radar initial from ATC, and that altitude needs to be specified by ATC. The pilot could even have been cleared to 2900 if it met the radar MVAC, but either way, ATC has to provide the altitude to the pilot outside HAIGS. JPH Steven P. McNicoll wrote: "Chris Brooks" wrote in message ... I was 17 miles EAST of the airport, intercepting the localizer. I was at 5000 feet, and just got "cleared for the approach". I was IFR. In that case, you can descend to 4000 immediately. But why descend to 4000 at all? At the time you were cleared for the approach you were about 900 feet below the glideslope. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Jeff wrote: what was your exact instructions from the tower, its usually something like cherokee xxx cleared for the LOC runways 27, maintain 5000 untill established on the LOC if you were told to maintain a altitude untill established, then as soon as you were established on the LOC you could decend per your glideslope needle. The word "established" is to be used only when you're vectored onto a published route or segment of an approach. In this case, 17 miles out, it would be an altitude restriction until *crossing* the first published fix. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks, that is a good reply.
Do you confirm that if you hear "cross HAIGS at 4000 feet", that you can immediately descend from whatever altitude you are at. Say you are at 5,000 feet (as I was). If you hear that you can descend to 4,000? Usually won't the controller issue you a descent to 4,000 and then the crossing restriction? Such as "descend maintain 4,000... cross HAIGS at 4,000, cleared ILS 27". What if they just said "descend maintain 4,000, cleared ILS 27"... is that not proper procedure? "J Haggerty" wrote in message news:B0JAc.20624$1L4.19005@okepread02... At 17 miles point, he's not on a published portion of the approach, since he's not doing the hold-in-lieu of PT. He should have received a crossing restriction until HAIGS, since the vector did not place him on the localizer within the published portion of the approach. Approach could have provided a radar initial and cleared him to 4000 until HAIGS, but without that clearance, he's stuck at the last assigned altitude until reaching HAIGS. At that point he can descend to 4000 if he needs a course reversal, or 2900 if he continues straight-in. I'm sure 4000 is fine at that point, because that's what the hold-in-lieu uses, but from a procedural (TERPS and ATC) standpoint the only "straight-in" procedure track at 17 miles is a radar initial from ATC, and that altitude needs to be specified by ATC. The pilot could even have been cleared to 2900 if it met the radar MVAC, but either way, ATC has to provide the altitude to the pilot outside HAIGS. JPH Steven P. McNicoll wrote: "Chris Brooks" wrote in message ... I was 17 miles EAST of the airport, intercepting the localizer. I was at 5000 feet, and just got "cleared for the approach". I was IFR. In that case, you can descend to 4000 immediately. But why descend to 4000 at all? At the time you were cleared for the approach you were about 900 feet below the glideslope. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Peter R. wrote:
Matt Whiting ) wrote: That has been my experience flying practice approaches at ELM, BGM and ITH. Matt, at what airport are you based? I am out of Syracuse and I like to fly a lot of my practice IFR flights into those airports you listed. ELM. Matt |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
are you doing your training alone or with an instructor? I would suggest
doing most of this training with an instructor so that you pass your check ride. Passing the check ride is not enough. Once you have the ticket you have to prove over and over that you are proficient |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Chris Brooks wrote:
Thanks, that is a good reply. Do you confirm that if you hear "cross HAIGS at 4000 feet", that you can immediately descend from whatever altitude you are at. Say you are at 5,000 feet (as I was). If you hear that you can descend to 4,000? Usually won't the controller issue you a descent to 4,000 and then the crossing restriction? Such as "descend maintain 4,000... cross HAIGS at 4,000, cleared ILS 27". By providing an approach clearance and a crossing restriction, the controller has authorized you to descend to that altitude immediately, and to maintain that altitude until you reach the fix where the altitude restriction applies. What if they just said "descend maintain 4,000, cleared ILS 27"... is that not proper procedure? No, that's similar to what was given to TWA 514 (the airliner crash that initiated the requirement for specific altitudes and clearances). In that situation, the pilot was established at 7000 when cleared for the approach, but not yet on a published portion of the procedure. The rules were less clear back then, but the pilot should have been told to maintain a specific altitude, as well as a point where that altitude no longer applied (i.e., maintain 7000 until crossing XXXXX). When the controller says "maintain 4000" they're supposed to also state the point where the 4000 restriction no longer applies. It should be "maintain 4000 until HAIGS" if you intercept East of HAIGS, or "4000 until established on the localizer" if interception is inside of HAIGS. I'm concerned that some controllers feel that intercepting a localizer anywhere is all that is needed, but that only works if the localizer intercept point is within a published part of the procedure, or for this approach, inside HAIGS. You can review the TWA crash details at http://www.aopa.org/asf/asfarticles/sp9806.html |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
By providing an approach clearance and a crossing restriction, the
controller has authorized you to descend to that altitude immediately, and to maintain that altitude until you reach the fix where the altitude restriction applies. Again, excellent reply... thank you for your help. Do you know where the above is written? ATC handbook I am assuming, but what part? Thanks again. |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
but passing the check ride is the first part.
Hankal wrote: are you doing your training alone or with an instructor? I would suggest doing most of this training with an instructor so that you pass your check ride. Passing the check ride is not enough. Once you have the ticket you have to prove over and over that you are proficient |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Here's a note from the Air Traffic Control "bible"; FAAO 7110.65P
NOTE- 1. A descent clearance which specifies a crossing altitude authorizes descent at pilot's discretion for that portion of the flight to which the crossing altitude restriction applies. This can be found here at this link; http://www.faa.gov/ATpubs/ATC/Chp4/atc0405.html#4-5-7 You might also be interested in Example 4 under para 5-9-4. ARRIVAL INSTRUCTIONS found at this link; http://www.faa.gov/ATpubs/ATC/Chp5/atc0509.html#5-9-1 "Aircraft 4 is established on the final approach course beyond the approach segments, 8 miles from Alpha at 6,000 feet. The MVA for this area is 4,000 feet. "Eight miles from Alpha. Cross Alpha at or above four thousand. Cleared I-L-S runway three six approach." (See FIG 5-9-1.)" The depicted situation is very similar to the first question posed regarding the approach procedure. JPH Chris Brooks wrote: By providing an approach clearance and a crossing restriction, the controller has authorized you to descend to that altitude immediately, and to maintain that altitude until you reach the fix where the altitude restriction applies. Again, excellent reply... thank you for your help. Do you know where the above is written? ATC handbook I am assuming, but what part? Thanks again. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A question on Airworthiness Inspection | Dave S | Home Built | 1 | August 10th 04 05:07 AM |
Question: DP altitude vs MCA/MEA | Doug Easton | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | April 7th 04 03:29 AM |
Question | Charles S | Home Built | 4 | April 5th 04 09:10 PM |
Tecumseh Engine Mounting Question | jlauer | Home Built | 7 | November 16th 03 01:51 AM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |