If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"machf" wrote in message news On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:57:12 -0800, "Tarver Engineering" wrote: Actually, once the notch filter was adjusted such that the wing did not delaminate, there was no benifit to forward swept wings. Uh... excuse me, but what's a "notch filter" in this context? In the feedback control system of the X-29 was a z-transform type filter at 3.2 Hz. This was a simple third order filter in the original airframe. Once the filter was altered to eliminate the flutter problem on the second airframe, there was no manuverability advantage. The first airframe having a delaminated wing by that time. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:04:07 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote: "machf" wrote in message news On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:57:12 -0800, "Tarver Engineering" wrote: Actually, once the notch filter was adjusted such that the wing did not delaminate, there was no benifit to forward swept wings. Uh... excuse me, but what's a "notch filter" in this context? In the feedback control system of the X-29 was a z-transform type filter at 3.2 Hz. This was a simple third order filter in the original airframe. Once the filter was altered to eliminate the flutter problem on the second airframe, there was no manuverability advantage. The first airframe having a delaminated wing by that time. Oh, I see... I forgot that the X-29 had to rely heavily on electronics, and thought maybe it was some mechanical equivalent or something. Thanks for clearing that up. Ah, z-transforms... It's been quite a while, but I used to be pretty good at that stuff. -- __________ ____---____ Marco Antonio Checa Funcke \_________D /-/---_----' Santiago de Surco, Lima, Peru _H__/_/ http://machf.tripod.com '-_____|( remove the "no_me_j." and "sons.of." parts before replying |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"machf" wrote in message ... On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:04:07 -0800, "Tarver Engineering" wrote: "machf" wrote in message news On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:57:12 -0800, "Tarver Engineering" wrote: Actually, once the notch filter was adjusted such that the wing did not delaminate, there was no benifit to forward swept wings. Uh... excuse me, but what's a "notch filter" in this context? In the feedback control system of the X-29 was a z-transform type filter at 3.2 Hz. This was a simple third order filter in the original airframe. Once the filter was altered to eliminate the flutter problem on the second airframe, there was no manuverability advantage. The first airframe having a delaminated wing by that time. Oh, I see... I forgot that the X-29 had to rely heavily on electronics, and thought maybe it was some mechanical equivalent or something. Thanks for clearing that up. It could have been done mechanically, as the Russians have proven. Ah, z-transforms... It's been quite a while, but I used to be pretty good at that stuff. One of the people that worked for me at NASA got tasked with commenting the original FORTRAN and came to me for help understanding what Mr. Main had written. He was completely dissatisfied with what a third order filter does and was certain the software did nothing. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
German forward swept wing WWII fighter projects. | Charles Gray | Military Aviation | 4 | January 11th 04 01:49 PM |
Canard planes swept wing outer VG's? | Paul Lee | Home Built | 8 | January 4th 04 08:10 PM |
Props and Wing Warping... was soaring vs. flaping | Wright1902Glider | Home Built | 0 | September 29th 03 03:40 PM |
Can someone explain wing loading? | Frederick Wilson | Home Built | 4 | September 10th 03 02:33 AM |
Wing Extensions | Jay | Home Built | 22 | July 27th 03 12:23 PM |