If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Zero G profile
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Maxwell writes: Clueless as usual. A zero-G parabola is a ballistic trajectory; No, it isn't. bertie |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Zero G profile
mike regish writes:
You're accelerating downward at exactly 1 g, or 32 feet per second per second. Yes: -1.0 G. Zero g is zero g. You're not actually at zero G. You're in free fall, accelerating with the aircraft at exactly -1.0 G, which negates the acceleration due to gravity. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Zero G profile
Mxsmanic wrote in
: mike regish writes: You're accelerating downward at exactly 1 g, or 32 feet per second per second. Yes: -1.0 G. Zero g is zero g. You're not actually at zero G. You're in free fall, accelerating with the aircraft at exactly -1.0 G, which negates the acceleration due to gravity. You're a moron. Bertie |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Zero G profile
Bertie the Bunyip writes:
No, it isn't. A ballistic trajectory in a vacuum above the Earth's surface and subject only to gravity. A more precise but abstract description of the path is an orbital trajectory. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Zero G profile
Mxsmanic wrote:
mike regish writes: You're accelerating downward at exactly 1 g, or 32 feet per second per second. Yes: -1.0 G. Zero g is zero g. You're not actually at zero G. You're in free fall, accelerating with the aircraft at exactly -1.0 G, which negates the acceleration due to gravity. Velocity and acceleration are vectors and the sign depends on the coordinate system you define. Since you didn't define a coordinate system your use of negative numbers is just a pile of steaming crap designed to produce an endless arguement since you know most people would just use the absolute values when diving towards the Earth as the direction is understood by everyone not designing their responses to start an endless ****ing contest to show how smart they are. If you are accelerlating at 1 G in the direction of the Earth, you experience a force of 0 G. If you are accelerlating at -1 G in the direction of the Earth, you experience a force of 2 G. If you are accelerlating at 1 G in the direction away from Earth, you experience a force of 2 G. If you are accelerlating at -1 G in the direction away from Earth, you experience a force of 0 G. Twit. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Zero G profile
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Bertie the Bunyip writes: No, it isn't. A ballistic trajectory in a vacuum above the Earth's surface and subject only to gravity. A more precise but abstract description of the path is an orbital trajectory. Oops, you're wrong again! Don't you ever get tired of that? Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Saturn V Typical Mission Profile 9903826.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 12th 07 01:37 AM |
ASW27 wing profile templates | basils27 | Soaring | 0 | June 29th 05 11:46 AM |
Looking for 3/8 in-24 thread/low profile self locking nuts/ | Larry | Home Built | 3 | February 23rd 05 03:56 PM |
Looking for 3/8 in-24 thread/low profile self locking nuts/ | Larry | Home Built | 3 | February 22nd 05 03:02 PM |
Aviation Profile Prints for sale | Chris Banyai-Riepl | Military Aviation | 0 | July 7th 04 04:48 AM |