If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
Question of aborted landing after instrument approach
Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Newps writes: But here's one for you: KSFF ILS/DME 21R. If one makes the missed approach left turn before DME 0.7, one might hit that wee 4500-footer hill directly south of the airport. I don't see how that would be a problem. The missed is only 10 degrees off your inbound course. That's ten degrees in *heading*, off of an inbound course that had navigational guidance. Add some north wind, a late climb, sloppy heading control, and some bad luck, and *bang*. Plus it's not just obstructions. In airport-dense areas, I would imagine one might trespass on others' airspace by such shenanigans. Come to think of it, what is the earliest point along the approach that you would consider it legitimate to turn toward the MAP? If in your mind, that's the FAF, why? - FChE I don't think that is what you meant to say. When you're at the FAF you are tracking to the MAP. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Question of aborted landing after instrument approach
Sam Spade writes: [...] what is the earliest point along the approach that you would consider it legitimate to turn toward the MAP? If in your mind, that's the FAF, why? I don't think that is what you meant to say. When you're at the FAF you are tracking to the MAP. You're right, I meant missed approach holding point (if any). - FChE |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Question of aborted landing after instrument approach
On Dec 6, 7:03 pm, Newps wrote:
***** So name an approach where you get in trouble by flying the published missed prior to the MAP where it doesn't say on the plate specifically not to do that. ***** Let's assume for a minute that nobody can find such an approach. From just the two excerpts I've included below and those already mentioned, it is clear that the intent of the rules is for the pilot to proceed to the MAP prior to executing the missed approach. To argue otherwise is vain. Sure, most (if not all) approach procedures may have been designed to be idiot-proof. Why would anyone be so eager to be the idiot? Chad Speer PP-ASEL, IA ATCS, Kansas City ARTCC ============================== From the P/C G: MISSED APPROACH- a. snip A pilot executing a missed approach prior to the Missed Approach Point (MAP) must continue along the final approach to the MAP. From the 7110.65: 4-8-9. MISSED APPROACH 2. In the event of a missed approach involving a turn, unless otherwise cleared, the pilot will proceed to the missed approach point before starting that turn. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Silly controller | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 119 | August 30th 06 01:56 AM |
Silly controller | Robert M. Gary | Instrument Flight Rules | 123 | August 30th 06 01:56 AM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Approaches and takeoff mins. | jamin3508 | Instrument Flight Rules | 22 | September 14th 05 02:51 AM |
Which of these approaches is loggable? | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | August 16th 03 05:22 PM |