A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

AOPA, NBAA Decry WSJ’s ATC Stand



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 21st 18, 06:19 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,849
Default AOPA, NBAA Decry WSJ’s ATC Stand

https://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/new...-230331-1.html

AOPA, NBAA Decry WSJ’s ATC Stand

By Mary Grady | February 19, 2018

A Wall Street Journal editorial last week said it would be a good idea
to privatize the air traffic control system, and singled out the
opposition by NBAA and AOPA for critique. “What’s really going on,”
the WSJ editorial board says, is that the business jet industry pays
just 0.6 percent of aviation user taxes, though it accounts for 11 to
13 percent of controlled traffic. “The industry would like to keep it
that way,” the board says. NBAA and AOPA were quick to respond in
their own defense. In a rebuttal posted on their website, NBAA says
the WSJ editorial is incorrect in a number of key statements.

The Journal says only one seat on the proposed nonprofit board for ATC
would be held by the airlines, but NBAA notes that eight of the 13
board seats would be held by “airline-centric interests,” with only
two seats for GA. The editorial singled out NBAA and AOPA and “the
lobbyists for the paupers known as the corporate jet lobby” for
opposing privatization, but AOPA’s rebuttal noted that the newspaper
“ignored more than 200 GA groups as well as more than 100 mayors in
every state, airport organizations, chambers of commerce, and others
who have reviewed the [ATC privatization] proposal and reached a very
different conclusion.” AOPA and NBAA have jointly submitted a letter
to the editor with their arguments against the points made in the
editorial.
Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Private ATC or no? NBAA POV Frank Whiteley Soaring 3 November 17th 15 06:03 AM
NBAA Raises Concerns Over ADS-B Security Larry Dighera Piloting 0 June 5th 15 10:14 PM
STAND DOWN JJ Sinclair[_2_] Soaring 6 August 7th 11 10:50 AM
Epps 1907 monoplane at NBAA 2007 wright1902glider Home Built 17 September 30th 07 02:11 AM
What does SCB stand for? Harriet and John Naval Aviation 12 January 19th 04 12:02 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2018 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.