A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

air conditioning- nice, required, or silly?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #2  
Old July 7th 07, 08:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Mike Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 206
Default air conditioning- nice, required, or silly?

In the PA28-180 airplanes the air conditioner is famous for reducing the
useful load and helping to throw the alternator belt. I live in Arizona and
find a $20 vent scoop and a trailed open door to be good enough for my
comfort zone.

--
Best Regards,
Mike

http://photoshow.comcast.net/mikenoel

It is not work that kills men; it is worry. Worry is rust upon the blade.
wrote in message
oups.com...
Anybody have any experience with air conditioning in their plane-Nice
to have? Silly accessory? Don't leave home without it? 80% Summer
flying in Northeast.


Thanks for your opinion.

Andy



  #3  
Old July 7th 07, 10:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,573
Default air conditioning- nice, required, or silly?

Anybody have any experience with air conditioning in their plane-Nice
to have? Silly accessory? Don't leave home without it? 80% Summer
flying in Northeast.


Never had it, never missed it.

Unlike a car, you've got a built-in fan up front, with doors and
windows that open. And, of course, you're only on the ground long
enough to taxi out to the runway. Within minutes, you'll be up where
it's nice and cool.

I guess if Atlas (our Piper 235) had it, I'd probably use it (he's got
useful load to burn) -- but I wouldn't bother installing it. And if
I had a plane that was "payload-challenged" I'd probably remove it.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

  #5  
Old July 8th 07, 02:28 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
john smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,446
Default air conditioning- nice, required, or silly?

Followup question for those of you who have one installed:
What are the associated maintenance and repair costs for the A/C and its
related components?

The Turbo-arrow IV I fly had A/C originally installed, but it was
removed more than 10 years ago.)
  #6  
Old July 8th 07, 03:11 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,374
Default air conditioning- nice, required, or silly?

In article ,
john smith wrote:

Followup question for those of you who have one installed:
What are the associated maintenance and repair costs for the A/C and its
related components?


I had one on my cherokee 140 (until I removed it). It was in-op (no freon)
and I didn't have a problem with the alternator belts breaking, so the
associated maintenance and repair costs were zero.

--
Bob Noel
(goodness, please trim replies!!!)

  #7  
Old July 8th 07, 10:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,749
Default air conditioning- nice, required, or silly?

B,

You can always turn it off. G


which doesn't reduce weight much, though.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #8  
Old July 8th 07, 12:17 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
B A R R Y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 517
Default air conditioning- nice, required, or silly?

On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 11:23:57 +0200, Thomas Borchert
wrote:

B,

You can always turn it off. G


which doesn't reduce weight much, though.


True.
  #9  
Old July 8th 07, 10:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,749
Default air conditioning- nice, required, or silly?

I think the power/useful load/cost trade-off doesn't make sense for
most situations, including NOrtheeastern summers and single-engine
pistons. Also, many of the planes that offer AC as an option can be and
are flown high, so heat isn't an issue for long anyway. But, as always,
it's a question of what your mission is.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #10  
Old July 8th 07, 02:10 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,232
Default air conditioning- nice, required, or silly?

Thomas Borchert wrote:
I think the power/useful load/cost trade-off doesn't make sense for
most situations, including NOrtheeastern summers and single-engine
pistons. Also, many of the planes that offer AC as an option can be and
are flown high, so heat isn't an issue for long anyway. But, as always,
it's a question of what your mission is.


The problem is that many northeast airports are very busy and have long
taxi times. I've spent 30 minutes on the taxiway at Philly, Washington
National (pre 9/11 obviously), and Boston. On a 95 F day, this is
extremely unpleasant, even with the windows open (one nice 182 advantage).


Matt
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Silly L/D stats Andy[_1_] Soaring 1 April 9th 07 05:14 AM
Silly controller Robert M. Gary Instrument Flight Rules 123 August 30th 06 01:56 AM
Saab 340 air conditioning? John Clonts Piloting 1 July 14th 06 05:00 PM
ELT Required for all SSA sanctioned contests starting 2006 ELT Required for all SSA sanctione Steve Leonard Soaring 2 September 14th 05 03:49 AM
Air Conditioning System for Homebuilts? JPAviation Home Built 18 February 6th 04 03:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.