If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
First glider Nimbus 2 ?
A Nimbus 2 is on the market which I'm interested in as my first glider and I'd like some feedback from those who've owned or flown one.
I do realize that a flapped, long winged glider is not the best choice for a low time pilot which is why I will keep the glider in a hangar while I first build up some experience on Grob G102's. My motivation for purchase is because I think the glider matches my checklist for the type of flying I've always wished to do and also because of the opportunity presented which may not come around again. Due to the fact that gliders take ages to sell where I live (slow market), I'd rather purchase something I want to fly for the next 20 years than purchase an intermediate "first glider" that I battle to sell later. There is enough G102 stock available to hire in the transition phase. My aim in soaring has always been to do medium distance (300-500km), relaxed, cross country flying (armchair ride) so with regards to performance and bang-for-buck it ticks the boxes. I am not interested in competition flying.. I'd much rather cruise around at 160km/h with an L/D of ~40:1 than blast around at 200+ km/h trying to shave precious seconds off a task. I'd like to know more about the glider's vices or problem areas I need to be aware of. 1. Stall/spin characteristics. How much warning does it give before stalling and does it have any tendency to suddenly drop a wing and spin or can it be considered as one of the docile gliders in the stall/spin category? If it constantly wants to kill me (a pilot issue) I'd rather stay with an Astir and just limit my cross country range. 2. Pitch sensitivity. The glider has an all flying tail (not a 2B or 2C model). How pitch sensitive is it once trimmed in cruise? Is it twitchy/unstable and need constant attention or is it fairly stable and one doesn't have to constantly fight to keep attitude constant? 3. Approach control. How effective are the airbrakes? Are outlandings a challenge with the tail chute? Where I fly there are usually plenty of plowed fields at least 300m long and fairly wide (apparently guarded by farmers with shotguns). Areas I'm aware of: - Pitch is sensitive which evidently makes tugging a bit trickier. - Long wings and cross winds don't play nicely together on takeoff. - Don't go full positive flap on takeoff as the wing may fly before the tail! :-O - Roll rate is not snappy and the glider is a bit under ruddered which makes entering thermals a bit more challenging than most 15m ships. - Long wings and mediocre airbrakes (compared to Astirs) make out landings more challenging/dangerous. - Heavy wings are not an issue as the glider will be hangared and flown conservatively cross country. The odd retrieve shouldn't be a reason to not fly such an awesome old lady. - The glider comes with a decent trailer and accessories before someone brings that up. - All AD's including tail AD applied. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
First glider Nimbus 2 ?
On Thursday, March 12, 2015 at 9:11:44 PM UTC-6, Surge wrote:
A Nimbus 2 is on the market which I'm interested in as my first glider and I'd like some feedback from those who've owned or flown one. I do realize that a flapped, long winged glider is not the best choice for a low time pilot which is why I will keep the glider in a hangar while I first build up some experience on Grob G102's. My motivation for purchase is because I think the glider matches my checklist for the type of flying I've always wished to do and also because of the opportunity presented which may not come around again. Due to the fact that gliders take ages to sell where I live (slow market), I'd rather purchase something I want to fly for the next 20 years than purchase an intermediate "first glider" that I battle to sell later. There is enough G102 stock available to hire in the transition phase. My aim in soaring has always been to do medium distance (300-500km), relaxed, cross country flying (armchair ride) so with regards to performance and bang-for-buck it ticks the boxes. I am not interested in competition flying. I'd much rather cruise around at 160km/h with an L/D of ~40:1 than blast around at 200+ km/h trying to shave precious seconds off a task. I'd like to know more about the glider's vices or problem areas I need to be aware of. 1. Stall/spin characteristics. How much warning does it give before stalling and does it have any tendency to suddenly drop a wing and spin or can it be considered as one of the docile gliders in the stall/spin category? If it constantly wants to kill me (a pilot issue) I'd rather stay with an Astir and just limit my cross country range. 2. Pitch sensitivity. The glider has an all flying tail (not a 2B or 2C model). How pitch sensitive is it once trimmed in cruise? Is it twitchy/unstable and need constant attention or is it fairly stable and one doesn't have to constantly fight to keep attitude constant? 3. Approach control. How effective are the airbrakes? Are outlandings a challenge with the tail chute? Where I fly there are usually plenty of plowed fields at least 300m long and fairly wide (apparently guarded by farmers with shotguns). Areas I'm aware of: - Pitch is sensitive which evidently makes tugging a bit trickier. - Long wings and cross winds don't play nicely together on takeoff. - Don't go full positive flap on takeoff as the wing may fly before the tail! :-O - Roll rate is not snappy and the glider is a bit under ruddered which makes entering thermals a bit more challenging than most 15m ships. - Long wings and mediocre airbrakes (compared to Astirs) make out landings more challenging/dangerous. - Heavy wings are not an issue as the glider will be hangared and flown conservatively cross country. The odd retrieve shouldn't be a reason to not fly such an awesome old lady. - The glider comes with a decent trailer and accessories before someone brings that up. - All AD's including tail AD applied. I have owned a N2C and I would not recommend it to a pilot without several hundred hours experience in another high performance flapped glider. There are no issues in free flight - in fact the N2C is a very stable bird - but takeoff and landings can be a handful for anyone new to the glider. It sometimes feels like one needs three hands. The trailing edge air brakes are immensely powerful. I think the full brake 60 kt glide is something like 2:1 so about 4" of air brake handle movement changes the glide from just under 50:1 to 2:1. That takes a little time to get used to. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
First glider Nimbus 2 ?
On Friday, 13 March 2015 05:23:49 UTC+2, Bill D wrote:
I have owned a N2C and I would not recommend it to a pilot without several hundred hours experience in another high performance flapped glider. Wow! That bad. I found a similar thread with similar advice https://groups.google.com/forum/#!to...ng/zwO51PdZW00 It's just a pity that access to other flapped gliders is rather limited or expensive in my case. The trailing edge air brakes are immensely powerful. The trailing edge brakes were apparently only added in the N2C and are not found in the 2 or 2B. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
First glider Nimbus 2 ?
On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 6:31:41 PM UTC+13, Surge wrote:
On Friday, 13 March 2015 05:23:49 UTC+2, Bill D wrote: I have owned a N2C and I would not recommend it to a pilot without several hundred hours experience in another high performance flapped glider. Wow! That bad. I found a similar thread with similar advice https://groups.google.com/forum/#!to...ng/zwO51PdZW00 It's just a pity that access to other flapped gliders is rather limited or expensive in my case. I've never flown a Nimbus, but I've got a fair bit of experience in the first generation Janus, also with flaps and all-flying tailplane. To be honest, I'm not sure that hours matter that much with these aircraft. You either "get" them or you don't. I had 75 hours total, 54 hours PIC, when I started flying the Janus. It was new to our club and expensive and they were very protective of it, so I had to do nine dual takeoffs and landings in a variety of weather conditions before they gave me my (pax) rating in it. I've seen other people, experienced instructors in Grobs with hundreds of hours, who took one or two flights in the Janus and declared they'd never set foot in it again. I definitely would recommend you to find an early model Janus and do a few dual flights in it before flying the Nimbus (preferably before deciding to buy it), even if you have to travel to do so. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
First glider Nimbus 2 ?
Apart from being a poor choice as a first glider in terms of rigging,
handling and approach control, you would be unlikely to want to stick with an early Nimbus 2 for many years which would negate the logic of wanting to buy it in the first place. As a general point the early generation of GRP flapped gliders really don't gain much from the flaps relative to slightly later unflapped gliders - especially those, like the Nimbus, with Wortmann FX- 67 series profiles which are very badly affected by rain and bugs. The standard class gliders from the LS4, Discus onwards are all seriously useful, well sorted out gliders. John Galloway At 06:10 13 March 2015, Bruce Hoult wrote: On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 6:31:41 PM UTC+13, Surge wrote: On Friday, 13 March 2015 05:23:49 UTC+2, Bill D wrote: I have owned a N2C and I would not recommend it to a pilot without seve= ral hundred hours experience in another high performance flapped glider. =20 Wow! That bad. I found a similar thread with similar advice https://groups.google.com/fo= rum/#!topic/rec.aviation.soaring/zwO51PdZW00 It's just a pity that access to other flapped gliders is rather limited o= r expensive in my case. I've never flown a Nimbus, but I've got a fair bit of experience in the fir= st generation Janus, also with flaps and all-flying tailplane. To be honest, I'm not sure that hours matter that much with these aircraft.= You either "get" them or you don't. I had 75 hours total, 54 hours PIC, when I started flying the Janus. It was= new to our club and expensive and they were very protective of it, so I ha= d to do nine dual takeoffs and landings in a variety of weather conditions = before they gave me my (pax) rating in it. I've seen other people, experienced instructors in Grobs with hundreds of h= ours, who took one or two flights in the Janus and declared they'd never se= t foot in it again. I definitely would recommend you to find an early model Janus and do a few = dual flights in it before flying the Nimbus (preferably before deciding to = buy it), even if you have to travel to do so. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
First glider Nimbus 2 ?
On Friday, 13 March 2015 08:10:53 UTC+2, Bruce Hoult wrote:
I definitely would recommend you to find an early model Janus and do a few dual flights in it before flying the Nimbus (preferably before deciding to buy it), even if you have to travel to do so. Thanks, that's an excellent suggestion and a privately owned Janus (first one built) is located at the club I fly at. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
First glider Nimbus 2 ?
On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 9:00:04 PM UTC+13, John Galloway wrote:
Apart from being a poor choice as a first glider in terms of rigging, handling and approach control, you would be unlikely to want to stick with an early Nimbus 2 for many years which would negate the logic of wanting to buy it in the first place. Ray Lynskey did. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
First glider Nimbus 2 ?
On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 9:20:27 PM UTC+13, Surge wrote:
On Friday, 13 March 2015 08:10:53 UTC+2, Bruce Hoult wrote: I definitely would recommend you to find an early model Janus and do a few dual flights in it before flying the Nimbus (preferably before deciding to buy it), even if you have to travel to do so. Thanks, that's an excellent suggestion and a privately owned Janus (first one built) is located at the club I fly at. By the way, we tried the tail chute on our Janus a few times and then disabled it. The airbrakes are not all that strong (neither are those in the Duo Discus!), but landing flap plus airbrake together are as effective as the brakes in most other gliders. Plus add in side slip and you've got a massively steep descent. You don't want to do that all the way to the ground, but it will get you down to a normal approach angle and then I'd say recover from the slip by 100 or 150 ft. I don't think the parachute offers anything more than do the other tools at your disposal -- tools which you can apply and take off repeatedly if necessary. I don't know how similar the Nimbus is in that regard. I'd suspect pretty similar, but I don't know for sure. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
First glider Nimbus 2 ?
Definately not a first glider.More like a third.
I've had mine(N2 A) for 16 years and love it to bits.You need to lead with the rudder in turns,which goes against all I was taught regarding co-ordinating the controls.If you do not it does a very good demonstration of aileron drag. I had a set of retro-fitted "Discus" winglets fitted,which improved matters tremendously. I went from a Pik 20 B to the Nimbus and was glad of the flapped experience gained on the Pik. Definately suggest flapped experience in a Janus. Also buy a good set of covers;people tend to disappear when it's rigging time. A series of flights in an earlyGenerallAt 08:30 13 March 2015, Bruce Hoult wrote: On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 9:20:27 PM UTC+13, Surge wrote: On Friday, 13 March 2015 08:10:53 UTC+2, Bruce Hoult wrote: I definitely would recommend you to find an early model Janus and do a = few dual flights in it before flying the Nimbus (preferably before deciding= to buy it), even if you have to travel to do so. =20 Thanks, that's an excellent suggestion and a privately owned Janus (first= one built) is located at the club I fly at. By the way, we tried the tail chute on our Janus a few times and then disab= led it. The airbrakes are not all that strong (neither are those in the Duo Discus!= ), but landing flap plus airbrake together are as effective as the brakes i= n most other gliders. Plus add in side slip and you've got a massively stee= p descent. You don't want to do that all the way to the ground, but it will= get you down to a normal approach angle and then I'd say recover from the = slip by 100 or 150 ft. I don't think the parachute offers anything more than do the other tools at= your disposal -- tools which you can apply and take off repeatedly if nece= ssary.=20 I don't know how similar the Nimbus is in that regard. I'd suspect pretty s= imilar, but I don't know for sure. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Mate,
I have owned my N2 for 18 months now, I guess I have put about 100hrs on it and flown two comps. The sailplane I owned before this one was a Phoebus C. I did a huge amount of research before I bought mine and the most important advice I got from one of our gliding gods was. It's a gentleman's conveyance , don't fly stupid speeds and you will catch the gaggle at half climb and leave before them. My recommendation is to go out and buy it ASAP. Cheap 18m performance for 20k Schempp hirth quality It will fly with a ASW20 LS8 all day as long as you don't go too fast It will go like a scalded cat if you fill the water tanks. It's a little bit intimidating if you fly it way over gross weight ""I have heard" The cockpit is huge and comfortable It's easy to rig by yourself if you have a good single man rigger You can fit and carry the tips easily by yourself It's LD will get you home most days it has a all flying tail plane for less maintenance You have to think about the launch if you haven't flown flaps before 1 make sure it's lined up properly 2 start off in full negative flap 3 as soon as you have roll control move to positive flap 4 the tail will fly when ready, the book says start with full forward or back but I tend to trim it so that its neutral. People will run off if they see you starting to rig but I can do it on my own in about an hour if left alone. The all flying tail plane is a non event, I can fly mine hands off for enough time to get a uridome on, it does get twitchy at 120kts but how often do you really fly at those speeds. I have flown the asw15/Phoebus and the nimbus is easier to fly. Thermaling is a breeze, I have head all these stories about its hard to turn, yes sometimes you have full rudder and notice it but these are sailplanes not Pitts specials. The hoteliers are a little painful if it doesn't have the access hatch, if it doesn't the secret is to put your head in the hole and put the safety's in by putting your arm through the steel structure area. I haven't outlandend mine yet but whilst the airbrakes aren't super powerful you can always hit your touch down point with ease. My advice is to buy it and only take advice from those who have flown one and have opinions other than ones borne from the web. I am an instructor and would happily send a pilot out in it as Lang as the had the correct mindset and a good cross country ability. As a rough guess 50-70 hrs with good single seat time. I think sometimes people forget that the legends of our sport flee these things 40 years ago and whilst they will never be as nice as a JS1 or ASG29 you aren't paying $200 k either. My email is justinjsinclair the usual symbol hotmail.com if you want pics or furrier info Justin Quote:
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Nimbus 3-25.5 | JS | Soaring | 0 | February 19th 08 07:49 PM |
FS Nimbus 3 | Roy Bourgeois | Soaring | 0 | December 26th 07 07:47 PM |
Nimbus down? | [email protected] | Soaring | 2 | November 21st 06 02:10 PM |
Nimbus 4 | Ray Gimmey | Soaring | 0 | May 17th 04 06:46 PM |
F.S. Nimbus 3DM | Tom Stowers | Soaring | 0 | October 18th 03 07:06 PM |