A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Dear Mary...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old March 5th 04, 11:19 PM
Ajax Telamon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Replacement_Tommel" wrote in
message ...
In article , Michael Wise

says...

In article ,
Douglas Berry wrote:

Lo, many moons past, on Thu, 04 Mar 2004 21:35:28 GMT, a stranger
called by some "Jarg" came forth and
told this tale in us.military.army

"Douglas Berry" In the US, marriages are handled by county

registars.
Not the states,
not the federal government. Those marriages might only be legal in

a
singal county now, they are marriages.

I'm afraid that simply isn't true:

California passed Proposition 22, which says that only marriages

between a[i]
man and a woman are valid in California.

State law is very clear, said Randy Thomasson, executive director of
Campaign for California Families.
"ssuing invalid marriage certificates and officiating at

unlawful
weddings is a misdemeanor and punishable with fines and jail time,"

the
group said.

Which violates Article 1, Section 31 of the Constitution.


-----------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 31. (a) The State shall not discriminate against, or grant
preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of
race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of
public employment, public education, or public contracting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------


I don't see anything there about sexual preference. It clearly states
"sex"...and not sexual preference.


Look up the full faith and credit clause in Art IV, Sec. 1 - all states

must
recognize the legislative acts, public records (-i.e. Marriages legally
performed in that state), and judicial decisons in that state.

Fauntleroy v. Lum, 210 U.S. 230, 28 S.Ct. 641 extrapolates on this.

In short, if a state allows gays to marry, ALL other sates must recognize

it.

Go ahead, look it up.

-Tom


Didn't Clinton's masterpiece enactment of the Defense of Marriage Act do an
end run around the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution to
forestall just this eventuality? I wonder if the DOMA has been tested in
court?
Take care,
--
Ajax Telamon
"The belief in the possibility
of a short decisive war appears
to be one of the most ancient
and dangerous of human illusions."
- Robert Lynd



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
At Dear Ol' AVL Airport, Asheville, NC jls Home Built 39 May 2nd 05 02:20 AM
From "Dear Oracle" Larry Smith Home Built 0 December 27th 03 04:25 AM
About death threats and other Usenet potpourri :-) Dudley Henriques Military Aviation 4 December 23rd 03 07:16 AM
Dear Dr. Strangewater pac plyer Home Built 8 August 20th 03 12:45 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.