If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Boeing Offers Additional F/A-18 Sale to U.S. Navy
It is demanded in the procurement "process" - to get new you must show
that the old is no longer relevant and there problem is some folks try to help that along " wrote in message ups.com... Interesting theory and I have heard something similar back in 2004 or 2005. I don't know how much of this is true however. On May 2, 9:41 pm, "Flashnews" wrote: You know considering how the Navy chose to deliberately go about destroying anything and everything "old" that would interfere with their plan to modernize the Navy - a politically motivated behavior seen in the demise of the Convair B-58 Hustlers as a retribution act to match to the destruction of all the Northrop Flying Wings. I am not so sure the Iranians can really get or want those F-14 parts from AMARC (if it were even possible) but it is possible that the F-14D could be refurbished into an even stronger jet that would embarrass first the F/A-18 and then much worse the F-35, especially given its failing components and subsystems. The methodology is all the same - over kill the hype about how old and broken the airframe is, selectively shut down spares and key component supply, and make the program look like a mess. The F-14D can still fly circles around all other Navy fighters and if it would be given some of the reliability and maintainability upgrades evident in the E/F as well as the AESA upgrade from the F-35 - well the old Turkey would smile a new light on Naval Air. As long as anyone can look back the present breed of Naval air leadership is petrified - absolutely paranoid - of not only that it can't do the Tomcat's job with what's left but what the F-14 could still grow beyond itself. The demise of the Tomcat will be the date in which carrier aviation became unbalanced - with new fast nuclear ships and a weak unsupportive air wing - thus bringing the submarine one notch closer to replacing the surface fleet as the critical combatant lead. "Choose Wisely" and they did not - |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bush Orders Nuclear Aircraft Carrier Eisenhower and Additional Navy Ships To Iran's Western Coast | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 0 | October 15th 06 06:39 AM |
Navy Performs Maximum Range Test of Boeing SLAM-ER | KDR | Naval Aviation | 7 | June 13th 05 07:56 AM |
Boeing contract with Navy could help with Air Force tanker deal | Henry J Cobb | Military Aviation | 0 | June 20th 04 10:32 PM |
"Boeing sale to China skirts ban on technology transfer" | Mike | Military Aviation | 1 | February 6th 04 04:57 AM |
U.S. Navy ordered 210 Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet attack jets | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 3 | December 31st 03 08:59 PM |