A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

OLC - 20 rejected, 18 Accepted



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 4th 06, 04:08 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default OLC - 20 rejected, 18 Accepted

As of 2150 CDT, 2006.06.03 of 38 OLC entries posted for the day, 20 were
rejected, 18 were accepted.

What's the point?

Explanations and guidance from OLC continue to be incomplete and
unclear, as they were last year. OLC could have used the time to improve
the system, but instead they used it to create more complication. I can
not imagine that participation will continue to skyrocket in future
under these conditions.

I will not spend 1000+ dollars to buy and install an "approved" logger,
just to play with the OLC. My handheld Garmin GPSMAP 76S was good enough
last year, and quite appropriate for a retired 1-26 owner on a budget,
but this year not.

A new form of elitism finds a niche in soaring -- just what we need.


Jack
  #2  
Old June 4th 06, 05:05 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default OLC - 20 rejected, 18 Accepted

Jack wrote:
As of 2150 CDT, 2006.06.03 of 38 OLC entries posted for the day, 20 were
rejected, 18 were accepted.

What's the point?

Explanations and guidance from OLC continue to be incomplete and
unclear, as they were last year. OLC could have used the time to improve
the system, but instead they used it to create more complication. I can
not imagine that participation will continue to skyrocket in future
under these conditions.

I will not spend 1000+ dollars to buy and install an "approved" logger,
just to play with the OLC. My handheld Garmin GPSMAP 76S was good enough
last year, and quite appropriate for a retired 1-26 owner on a budget,
but this year not.

A new form of elitism finds a niche in soaring -- just what we need.


There are only six now with the red mark, out of 54. Sometimes it takes
a while for the OLC computers check all the flights.


--
Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA

www.motorglider.org - Download "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane
Operation"
  #3  
Old June 4th 06, 05:17 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default OLC - 20 rejected, 18 Accepted

Jack wrote:
As of 2150 CDT, 2006.06.03 of 38 OLC entries posted for the day, 20 were
rejected, 18 were accepted.

What's the point?

Explanations and guidance from OLC continue to be incomplete and
unclear, as they were last year. OLC could have used the time to improve
the system, but instead they used it to create more complication. I can
not imagine that participation will continue to skyrocket in future
under these conditions.

I will not spend 1000+ dollars to buy and install an "approved" logger,
just to play with the OLC. My handheld Garmin GPSMAP 76S was good enough
last year, and quite appropriate for a retired 1-26 owner on a budget,
but this year not.

A new form of elitism finds a niche in soaring -- just what we need.


Jack



Sorry, I jumped the gun -- it's down to 7 rejects now (45 min later).
Apparently, the system was a bit too heavily loaded, but is beginning to
catch up. After my four and a half hour flight today I am fried, and
even more short-tempered than usual. Even so, OLC worked a lot smoother
last year. Let's hope the product improves.

Thankfully, it looks as though I can continue to use the Garmin GPSMAP
76S effectively, and spend my money on tows and bottled water instead of
buying an "approved" logger.


Jack
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
JAR-22 should be accepted as Special Light Sport Aircraft standard M B Soaring 0 June 6th 05 06:54 PM
Clearance with an Odd Intersection Marco Leon Instrument Flight Rules 92 March 11th 05 03:16 PM
BUSH REJECTED PLANS TO GO AFTER TOP TERRORIST WalterM140 Military Aviation 7 September 24th 04 01:09 AM
Something Fishy with Kerry's being a "Hero" Pechs1 Naval Aviation 16 February 29th 04 02:16 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.