A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Libelle 201 query



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old February 2nd 16, 03:19 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Eric Bick (ZN7)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16
Default Libelle 201 query

On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 at 9:39:40 AM UTC-7, Steve Leonard wrote:
On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 at 10:18:38 AM UTC-6, Kevin Christner wrote:
OK, it really isn't a "Libelle", but the FJ-1. It is a 201 cockpit, though.


Great article on the FJ-1 in last months Soaring with part 2 coming up. May be the best article I've read in Soaring in years. Bravo.


Thank Pat Philbrick, Alan Bikle, and Fred Jiran. They did all the work on the plane and the article!


It was a great article, and I welcome more like it. Thanks for the kudos. Would be nice to get "letters to the editor" on occasion. That's how I know if we're on track, meeting members' interests.
Editor, Soaring Magazine.
  #22  
Old February 2nd 16, 11:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 580
Default Libelle 201 query

AFAIK, the "B" model originally meant top surface only dive brakes, foam core wing, large tailplane, and provision for optional water ballast, including higher gross weight and (I'm reaching on this one) higher VNE. I don't know that many came over with ballast tanks so for most of us, that simply meant the drawing that showed where it was OK to cut holes in the main bulkhead and landing gear box for the dump tubes; we fitted U.S. bags and homemade valves and tubing.

Having said that, I believe that all it took to upgrade a 201 to a 201B was some paperwork, so seeing "B" on the documentation might not be definitive..

Chip Bearden
  #23  
Old February 3rd 16, 10:35 PM
Ommadawn Ommadawn is offline
Junior Member
 
First recorded activity by AviationBanter: Jan 2016
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick Gilbert View Post
About the only thing of note would be AD compliance. There have been a couple of AD's requiring the purchase of parts from Streifeneder, but the 2 that spring to mind are old enough that they must have been completed (airbrake torque tube reinforcement & rudder yoke replacement). I recently bought a Glasflugel Mosquito from Western Australia and found that a 4-5 year old AD requiring the replacement of an elevator pushrod with a new part from Germany had not been completed.

What does it weigh? The paint looks original and with a no damage history it shouldn't have gained much. If it has been at an aerotow club the belly release may not be serviceable, although its not a big deal to make it so. Does it have ballast bags fitted? I note that no parachute or radio is specified in the ad, they may cost you a few thousand dollars if not included.

I don't think you can really go wrong at that price. As long as you fit in it.

Cheers,

Nick.


On Tuesday, 2 February 2016 00:13:05 UTC+10:30, Ommadawn wrote:
Nick Gilbert;918501 Wrote:
Hi Frank,

There are several Standard Libelles in South Australia, including a few
at Gawler, and at least one at Stonefield. I'm sure the owners of these
gliders would have been more than happy for you to have a sit in one to
see how you fit. I am guessing you are likely at Balaklava.

For what it's worth, I'm 6 foot 3 & quite meaty, and I flew a Libelle
for many years. If anything, the biggest issue was related to my feet
rather than the size of the cockpit. Some people find them to be quite
narrow across the shoulders as the cockpit walls taper inwards at the
top, but deceptively long.

My Libelle was a combination of 2 - early production wings combined with
late production fuselage. My wings were balsa core and had upper & lower
surface brakes. I don't believe the switch to foam core was intended to
modernise the glider, more to solve a material sourcing problem.

Jim, for what it's worth, mine was the first of 2 libelles that Bob
Dircks owned, VH-GAK.

A 1973 build Libelle is likely to have foam core, the thicker & rounder
tailplane, and top surface airbrakes only. Come to think of it,
considering the fact that i'm an avid reader of gliding classified
sites, and Libelles, I am fairly sure I know the one you are talking
about. Considering it's serial number is in the late 450's I am certain
it is as described above.

Cheers,

Nick Gilbert
Mosquito VH-GSG


On Saturday, 30 January 2016 12:13:05 UTC+10:30, Ommadawn wrote:-
Thanks for the comprehensive feedback chaps.
I cant actually try out the glider as it is 2300Km away.
I will be making an epic road trip to check her out.
I will fit, as I'm not really big, but my buddy was the one I was
concerned about. He is about 6"1 and 100Kg.
Sounds like it won't be an issue for him.
If she checks out ok I will be hauling her home.
I hope to become a regular contributor to this forum, even if its just
to ask dumb newbie type questions, as this will be my first private
sailplane.
I have a significant history of hang gliding, RC model soaring and FPV
p

--
Ommadawn-

Its a B version, 1880 hours.
You guessed it, Nick. I'm with BGC in SA.
Any obvious things I should look for when inspecting a 43 YEAR OLD
GLIDER!!!?




--
Ommadawn
iloting.
I'm in Adelaide South Australia.
Cheers
Frank.



After an exhausting 4 day, 4400km road trip, the 201B is now resting comfortably in her new home. I hope to check her out this weekend.
Many thanks for the helpful feedback. Im sure I will have a heap more questions as I explore the new toy.
  #24  
Old February 4th 16, 02:46 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Nick Gilbert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Libelle 201 query

Congrats! Looking forward to seeing some photos.

Nick.
  #25  
Old February 4th 16, 10:45 AM
Ommadawn Ommadawn is offline
Junior Member
 
First recorded activity by AviationBanter: Jan 2016
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick Gilbert View Post
Congrats! Looking forward to seeing some photos.

Nick.
Not only pigeons come home...
I had no idea.
My Libelle actually started life at my very own gliding club, back in the early '70s.
Its original owner was a member back then. It obviously went through a number of owners and clubs all over Australia during the last 43 years.
Its then owner even loaned her to a Spanish pilot to fly in the Waikerie World Championships back then.
The pic shows her at Balaklava GC when she was new, in early '70s.
The Blanik AP in the picture was the glider I soloed in, 1979. This image holds special meaning for me. I left the club in late 1980, and rejoined August 2015. Looks like we both have come home.
What goes around, comes around.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	CT with AP.jpg
Views:	210
Size:	489.7 KB
ID:	80362  
  #26  
Old February 4th 16, 04:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
JS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,384
Default Libelle 201 query

A fantastic result, Frank!
Great photo, quite appropriate. Don't sleep with the Libelle every night, make time to watch "Zulu Romeo" again to look for CT.
Oops, sorry I didn't remember the right Gilbert.
Jim
  #27  
Old February 4th 16, 08:58 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Nick Gilbert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Libelle 201 query

Looks good Frank. The undercarriage looks different to usual.

Out of curiosity, what instrumentation came with it? Is the water ballast serviceable?

You got the right Gilbert Jim

Nick.


On Friday, 5 February 2016 02:32:06 UTC+10:30, JS wrote:
A fantastic result, Frank!
Great photo, quite appropriate. Don't sleep with the Libelle every night, make time to watch "Zulu Romeo" again to look for CT.
Oops, sorry I didn't remember the right Gilbert.
Jim


  #28  
Old February 4th 16, 09:51 PM
Ommadawn Ommadawn is offline
Junior Member
 
First recorded activity by AviationBanter: Jan 2016
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JS View Post
A fantastic result, Frank!
Great photo, quite appropriate. Don't sleep with the Libelle every night, make time to watch "Zulu Romeo" again to look for CT.
Oops, sorry I didn't remember the right Gilbert.
Jim
Nick, the belly release works, as it is used as part of the trailer restraint system.
She is fitted for water, but the bags are removed. The last owner made some new ones, but didn't fit them, as he wasn't happy with the result. I have them now, but will not be installing. I don't like the idea of winch launch failure, and a hurried landing with full wings. It comes with an old radio that is functional, Flarm, and some sort of GPS nav system I haven't even looked at yet. The instruments are old but adequate for now. My club has 4 parachutes which rarely see the light of day, as almost nobody flys the singles. I will use one of those for a while.
I will definitely have another look at ZR again and see if I can spot her!
  #29  
Old February 5th 16, 03:31 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Nick Gilbert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Libelle 201 query

Sounds good.

As far as the water is concerned, Libelles only hold 50 litres anyway so it wouldn't be too much of an issue in the event of a launch failure. In my memory water in the Libelle didn't really make an enormous difference with performance, but it did make it feel a little less like a cork in the ocean in turbulent conditions.

As far as the Balaklava parachutes are concerned, I had custody of one of them over the summer, as Eric borrowed mine for the Junior Worlds.

Nick

On Friday, 5 February 2016 12:13:05 UTC+10:30, Ommadawn wrote:
JS;919246 Wrote:
A fantastic result, Frank!
Great photo, quite appropriate. Don't sleep with the Libelle every
night, make time to watch "Zulu Romeo" again to look for CT.
Oops, sorry I didn't remember the right Gilbert.
Jim


Nick, the belly release works, as it is used as part of the trailer
restraint system.
She is fitted for water, but the bags are removed. The last owner made
some new ones, but didn't fit them, as he wasn't happy with the result.
I have them now, but will not be installing. I don't like the idea of
winch launch failure, and a hurried landing with full wings. It comes
with an old radio that is functional, Flarm, and some sort of GPS nav
system I haven't even looked at yet. The instruments are old but
adequate for now. My club has 4 parachutes which rarely see the light of
day, as almost nobody flys the singles. I will use one of those for a
while.
I will definitely have another look at ZR again and see if I can spot
her!


+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+



--
Ommadawn


  #30  
Old February 5th 16, 03:48 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
JS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,384
Default Libelle 201 query

I fitted some larger water ballast bags in a 201B. It does go better, but somehow feels less lovely than a Libelle normally does... Felt more like other gliders!
Jim
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Colibri II query waremark Soaring 11 October 19th 12 02:45 AM
Query on Geo Pilot GPS Mike Isaksen Piloting 7 August 8th 07 02:38 AM
Query on the Woodstock Stealth Pilot Soaring 3 July 25th 06 08:02 PM
A query news Military Aviation 2 October 18th 03 04:27 PM
Moving map query Martin Gregorie Soaring 7 September 8th 03 05:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.