If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
LS 4 vs ASW 20
Your opinions please.
Walt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
LS 4 vs ASW 20
On Sunday, May 19, 2013 6:32:37 PM UTC+2, Walt Connelly wrote:
Your opinions please. LS4 has go to be the easiest and safest std class glider to fly. Excellent performance if flown correctly (don't thermal too slow - fast and steep seems better), goes well loaded with water, big cockpit, foolproof (well, almost) gear system. If it was in production now, it would be the perfect first solo glider. ASW-20 is a classic, great performance, but can be tricky in some configurations, and probably not a beginners's glider. Both are wonderful to fly - which is better depends on what you want to do. Fun flying - the LS4 it tough to beat. Serious XC or racing on a budget? The 20 can hang in there still and has the "busy" feel that can be really cool. Kirk 66 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
LS 4 vs ASW 20
On May 19, 9:32*am, Walt Connelly
wrote: Your opinions please. Walt -- Walt Connelly Walt - Both are great gliders. Unless you're interested in pushing them to the absolute limit, you should probably base this decision on non- flying characteristics. The two ones I'd be most-concerned about a 1) Ergonomics. Which glider fits you better? If you're going for any multi-hour flights, cockpit ergonomics becomes important! 2) Trailer. Which glider has a better trailer? Cobra/Komet "clamshell- type" trailers are much preferable to tube-type trailers (I say this having owned both). Of course price pays a factor, as does the double-edged sword of flaps (you can go faster, faster; but its an additional item to worry about every time you transition from climbing to cruise, cruise to climb, on takeoff, and on landing). Good luck, --Noel |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
LS 4 vs ASW 20
On Sunday, May 19, 2013 11:32:37 AM UTC-5, Walt Connelly wrote:
Your opinions please. Walt -- Walt Connelly I had a Minden tube ..... great trailer. Easy in/out, tows great..... the gelcoat or refinish is the money question. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
LS 4 vs ASW 20
I'm 6' tall and weight more than I'd like. Though I have no experience with the ASW20 to compare, I found the LS4 quite comfortable except for the time the seat was too far forward and my parachute too low...
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
LS 4 vs ASW 20
On Sunday, May 19, 2013 12:32:37 PM UTC-4, Walt Connelly wrote:
Your opinions please. Walt I have a few hundred hours in an LS4 compared to only about 20 or so in ASW20s (two original models sometimes called "A" and a C). So, there's a slight bias in terms of experience. - LS4 is almost the perfect standard class glider. Incredibly easy to fly with good takeoff and landing characteristics and just doesn't bite unless horribly provoked. Excellent performance. The only two things I'd change are the landing gear (tiny wheel and pathetic brake) and the canopy mechanism (fiddly and insubstantial compared to Schleicher). I loved mine and sold it mainly because it was 20 years old and starting to require more care and feeding. - ASW20 is just a classic 15M ship. I found the winglets to be a big improvement for low speed handling, but the original straight tips weren't too bad. The early 20's could land in a small pasture with L flap - just be sure you have enough energy to round out. I would say that a 20 in thermal flap can be "interesting" in a spin if provoked; I found that it would recover at or maybe slightly beyond vertical depending on CG and the spin entry mode. Maybe a little more of a handful than the LS4, but something you would easily get used to with some hours. IMO, you can't go wrong with either of these. If you're buying used, it's the age old compromise of airframe, instruments, and trailer. A refinish is the biggest cost, followed by trailer and then instruments. Email me directly if you want more notes on the LS4; I have a whole notebook I wrote up when I owned mine. P3 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
LS 4 vs ASW 20
Both are classic gliders. Great examples of a flapped and standard
class ships. Both fly beautifully with the LS-4 being the most predictable and most comfortable, in my opinion. Similar to other commenters, I would put my primary emphasis on the trailer, and secondarily on the condition of the ship. I have found the trailer to be the most significant issue in the quality of my soaring day. A marginal trailer results in cut hands, bumped heads, sore backs, and new dents and dings on the ship. A great trailer allows easy one person rigging with no personal injuries and virtually no new damage to the ship. I purchased an SZD-59 a several years ago that had a Polish copy of a Cobra trailer. Looked nice. However, all the details of how nuts and bolts were placed, clearances between wings and trailer sides, how the elevator mounted in the trailer, how the ramp moved in and out were sooooooooooo different from my real Cobra trailer with my previous ship, that I ended up buying a new Cobra trailer for my ship. It made all the difference in the pleasure of my soaring day. It made all the difference to me in deciding on a marginal day whether I would go out to the glider port or not. Actually, I would base my decision on the trailer first, and the ship second. Unless, of course, you have the money to pay people to set-up your ship upon your beckoned call when you want to fly. Then it is their knuckles, fingers, backs, and scalps that experience the differences. Guy Acheson "DDS" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
LS 4 vs ASW 20
In article ,
"kirk.stant" wrote: Both are wonderful to fly - which is better depends on what you want to do. Fun flying - the LS4 it tough to beat. Serious XC or racing on a budget? The 20 can hang in there still and has the "busy" feel that can be really cool. Kirk 66 Yes, the "busy" feel of the glider talking about what the air is doing. That's my only reservation about the LS-4. It is almost too placid in the air. I'm used to flying a 301 Libelle, the very definition of a "busy" feeling glider. LS-4's, while extremely easy and pleasant to fly, feel almost "dead" to me compared to my Libelle or a -20. My preference, from flying so long with flaps, is for flapped ships. Whenever I fly an unflapped ship, it always feels like diving at the ground to go fast. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
LS 4 vs ASW 20
On Monday, May 20, 2013 10:30:51 AM UTC-4, WB wrote:
In article , My preference, from flying so long with flaps, is for flapped ships. Whenever I fly an unflapped ship, it always feels like diving at the ground to go fast. I think the Brits coined the term "tilters" for folks who fly Standard Class vs. Flapped gliders. We tilt at the ground to go faster. You shove the flap handle forward. :-) P3 Flapless and Proud |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
LS 4 vs ASW 20
On Sunday, May 19, 2013 12:32:37 PM UTC-4, Walt Connelly wrote:
Your opinions please. Walt -- Walt Connelly Walt: I owned an LS-4a and flew it quite a few hours!... it was the best investment anybody (Andy McQuigg!) could have recommended me!... want mo talk to Karen & Billy Kerns! See you one of these days! Best regards Enrique KO |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|