Extraterrestrial RPV

"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in
:


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in
news

Bertie forges a THIRD post




Really? Where, fjukktard?

Do tell?

Bertie

And then lies about it as usual.

Nope.

How predictable, you're really getting a bit boring.


IOW you are talking out of your ass and can't prove anything because it
doesn't exist.


Bertie

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
.. .


IOW you are talking out of your ass and can't prove anything because it
doesn't exist.


Bertie



Still lame, but a bit better, C-.

gregvk wrote:
Bertie the Bunyip wrote in news:g1kpeh$ce9$7
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in
:


"gregvk" wrote in message
...

That's your upper lip.




He likes to lead with it.


Bertie

Hey, why the **** did he mess with the attribs so it looks like I
wrote what he wrote?

You must be new here.

There is no extra "" in front of the "That's your upper lip."
So his quoting was syntactically correct and valid per RFC 2646 et al. So
he was not attributing that sentence to you.

I believe his definition of "forgery" is making it sorta kinda look
like somebody else wrote what you wrote yourself, or some such
bull****. But wouldn't that mean he forged me, above? I wonder what
Cox's policy on forging is. Whatever it is, I bet it's highly
unpleasant.

Same penalty they hand out for spelling errors, I imagine.

gregvk wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote in news:g1kpeh$ce9$7
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in
:


"gregvk" wrote in message
...

That's your upper lip.




He likes to lead with it.


Bertie

Hey, why the **** did he mess with the attribs so it looks like I
wrote what he wrote?


Cluelessness would be my guess.

I believe his definition of "forgery" is making it sorta kinda look
like somebody else wrote what you wrote yourself, or some such
bull****. But wouldn't that mean he forged me, above? I wonder what
Cox's policy on forging is. Whatever it is, I bet it's highly
unpleasant.


Bamboo shoots unpleasant?


Bertie

Jim Logajan wrote in
:

gregvk wrote:
Bertie the Bunyip wrote in news:g1kpeh$ce9$7
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in
:


"gregvk" wrote in message
...

That's your upper lip.




He likes to lead with it.


Bertie

Hey, why the **** did he mess with the attribs so it looks like I
wrote what he wrote?

You must be new here.

There is no extra "" in front of the "That's your upper lip."
So his quoting was syntactically correct and valid per RFC 2646 et al.
So he was not attributing that sentence to you.


Ooohkay..


I believe his definition of "forgery" is making it sorta kinda look
like somebody else wrote what you wrote yourself, or some such
bull****. But wouldn't that mean he forged me, above? I wonder what
Cox's policy on forging is. Whatever it is, I bet it's highly
unpleasant.

Same penalty they hand out for spelling errors, I imagine.


Whoooh. I dunno. Cox is notorious. I'd say it might be kneecapping
dpending on how many offences..



Bertie

"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in news:vxm%j.54$kR5.30
@newsfe24.lga:


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
.. .


IOW you are talking out of your ass and can't prove anything because
it
doesn't exist.


Bertie



Still lame, but a bit better, C-.


Yeh, 'kay, fjukktard..

Bertie

On Wed, 28 May 2008 16:58:40 -0500, "Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net
wrote:


"gregvk" wrote in message
.. .

That's your upper lip.

On Wed, 28 May 2008 16:58:40 -0500, "Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net
wrote:


"gregvk" wrote in message
.. .

That's your upper lip.

On Wed, 28 May 2008 16:58:40 -0500, "Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net
wrote:


"gregvk" wrote in message
.. .

That's your upper lip.

On Wed, 28 May 2008 06:57:26 -0500, "Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net
wrote:


Since no one will talk to you, I guess you have to talk to yourself.


Well, by now most of you have already figured out that many of "my"
posts have been forged, mostly by Buthead Bertie, but I am beginning
to think that there may be some other imposters in the group.

So, how can one tell which of my posts are real, and which are forged?
Good question. I guess I'm the only one smart enough to be able to
figure it out.

I guess I get the last laugh!