A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Microsoft Flight Simulator 2004



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 24th 03, 07:36 PM
TripFarmer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Microsoft Flight Simulator 2004

Does anyone own this? I was thinking of using it at home as I start my
instrument training for help with repetative proceedures.

If you own it do you have a recommendation for a Yoke or Joystick?

Thanks in advance.



Trip

Ads
  #2  
Old July 30th 03, 04:31 AM
Roger Halstead
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 24 Jul 2003 18:36:47 GMT, (TripFarmer) wrote:

Does anyone own this? I was thinking of using it at home as I start my
instrument training for help with repetative proceedures.


When I was doing my training I used one of the versions of FS, but I
don't remember which.

I had one sim that was for IFR training and it was great. It came on a
stack of floppies, which eventually became corrupted and I think they
went under.

Then I also picked up a copy of "On Top" and was not at all impressed
with the graphics and display... This was one of the earlier releases,
so they may have improved since then, but I'd sure not buy another
like the one I had. (still around here some where) I just found
it...version 6.0

If you own it do you have a recommendation for a Yoke or Joystick?


To some the difference between the yoke and Joystick is tremendous and
to others it makes not a nickels worth of difference.

I do prefer a setup that uses rudder pedals.

From what I've seen and my experience is a bit dated, they "good"
flight sims make an excellent add on to your training. IOW, it can
help with practicing your scan, holding altitude, flight planning, and
even a bit on approaches.

Unfortunately they lack the realism of being able to reach up and
switch radios and changing the OBS. Instead you have to point and
click. Some even have ATC giving you vectors for the approaches.

I did quite a few night flights from Chicago to MBS. I found the
simulated radios (com and nav) to be awkward, but other than that, I
think they helped quite a bit.

Leave the autopilot off) :-)), set the weather to something less than
clear and calm. OTOH I never have been able to land a sim in much
wind.

Roger Halstead (K8RI EN73 & ARRL Life Member)
www.rogerhalstead.com
N833R World's oldest Debonair? (S# CD-2)


Thanks in advance.



Trip


  #3  
Old August 6th 03, 02:13 AM
mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I just bought FS2004 and have been using FS2002 since it came out. In
FS2002 the IFR clearances were pretty limited - precision approaches
only, to the longest runway only at a given airport, no pop-up
clearances - but these shortcomings appear to have been addressed in
FS2004 although I havent played with it much yet.

In general though I would say at $50, it's a no braniner - when I was
doing my IFR training I could only manage to fly once a week, but I
found that doing a few approaches during the week on the sim made a
big difference in keeping the IFR synapses firing. Just counting the
extra training time I saved by doing this 'refreshing' on the sim (and
continue to do) I'm sure paid for the package and the joystick several
times over.

In addition, you can do stuff in the sim that is pretty hard to do in
real life:

1) Shoot any approach you feel like - want to practice an approach
with a DME arc, or a localiser back course approach - just find a
plate somewhere and fire up the sim.
2) Customizable weather - being able to set the ceilings just above
minimums with a programmable variation means you dont necessarily know
if you'll break out above the MDA or not - hard to get that kind of
experience in the air. Or playing with all sorts of wind conditions
3) Quickly shooting multiple approaches - just slew your plane back to
the initial approach fix and shoot it again.
4) There is a flight analysis page you can use to review your
flight/approach and replay it which is quite helpful when you want to
see what those procedure turns looked like, or how well you corrected
for wind, etc. - I guess you can do this with a GPS in real life too
if you have one.
5) FS2004 has a full Garmin GPS simulator in it which is great
practice. I think it takes several hours of practice with these things
to feel comfortable relying on one for a real approach and much of
this can be accomplished on the ground with a simulator, saving you
flight/training time in the air.
6) Pause button.
7) Practicing approaches in the sim before you do them in real life is
great preparation.
8) Practicing instrument/engine failures.

The things that the sim doesnt simulate well are (in no particular
order):

1) VOR and ADF needles dont exhibit course roughness or the same
'analog swing' that they do in real life which makes them a bit too
reliable.
2) In FS2002 at least, the markings on the ADF guage (in the 172) were
poorly aligned so that with the top of the needle on North the tail of
the needle was about 5 degress off South - or maybe it was the fixed
cardinal markings around the guage that were off - but in any case,
you had to do a bit of correcting for this when outbound from an NDB
which was pretty annoying. Might be the same in FS2004 too.
3) Compass error isnt nearly as bad as it is in real life - I'm not
even sure if there is any magnetic dip error or not. Certainly in real
life it bounces around much more than in the sim.
4) Turbulence and wind variation were pretty crude in FS2002 - you
could use it too mess you up a bit but trying to hold an approach
course in real turbulence and changing wind is much harder in my
opinion than in the sim because in the sim it seems that if you dont
react to the disturbance it all averages out and it doesnt work out
that easily in real life.
5) Spatial disorientation and fear (obviously), and when you're making
it up yourself it's hard to create the same kind of
workload-saturation that occurs in real life which is the hardest
thing to handle I think (although having an instructor throwing
instructions at you while you fly the sim isnt too far off).
6) Along the same lines - I dont think you're likely to get an ATC
hold instruction or a request declined, or even a clearance other than
the one you filed in the sim so the ATC side of things is pretty
predictable, but at least it lets you practice managing the radios for
handoffs, etc while your try to keep flying.


Just my 2cents.
  #4  
Old August 7th 03, 03:01 AM
mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Nice write-up on your web-page.

It's a shame that MS didnt just pull in the whole Garmin 530 simulator
into FS2004 - the only reason I can think of why they didnt was to
simplify it so that it would be easier to learn and document. Or maybe
Garmin refused to let them do that because it undermined their
licensing arrangements with other 3rd party vendors who interface the
real thing to flight simulator.
  #5  
Old August 7th 03, 05:40 AM
John Bell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Nice write-up on your web-page.

Thanks


  #8  
Old August 8th 03, 05:19 PM
Roger Halstead
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 06 Aug 2003 06:18:30 -0700, Mel Fisk
wrote:

Sounds reasonable. Anyone know of a good A-36 Bonanza model for FS2004?


Try rec.aviation.simulators, they can point you in the proper
direction. some on there are developers building all kinds of add
ons.

Roger Halstead (K8RI EN73 & ARRL Life Member)
www.rogerhalstead.com
N833R World's oldest Debonair? (S# CD-2)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
new theory of flight released Sept 2004 Mark Oliver Aerobatics 1 October 5th 04 10:20 PM
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP vvcd Home Built 0 September 22nd 04 07:16 PM
Flight test update - long nauga Home Built 0 June 18th 04 03:21 AM
IFR flight plan filing question Tune2828 Instrument Flight Rules 2 July 23rd 03 03:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2019 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.