If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#481
|
|||
|
|||
"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... Yes. It's defined in law. It's been defined in law for centuries. The OED echoes that definition. The State determines what specific killings are illegal. For a killing to be murder, the victim must be human, the killing must have been intentional, it must have been premeditated, and it must be illegal. The State defines what is murder and what is not. So no State has ever defined murder to include the intentional dismemberment of a fetus to be murder? So what's the big deal with Roe-v-Wade then? |
#482
|
|||
|
|||
California, as usual, provides a perfect example of the hypocrisy in this
issue... Look at the Scott Peterson case: he is charged with two counts of murder; one in the death of his pregnant wife, a second in the death of the fetus. But, in California, it is perfectly legal to abort a fetus, so a murder charge would not be levied against an abortion provider... "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message ink.net... "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... Yes. It's defined in law. It's been defined in law for centuries. The OED echoes that definition. The State determines what specific killings are illegal. For a killing to be murder, the victim must be human, the killing must have been intentional, it must have been premeditated, and it must be illegal. The State defines what is murder and what is not. So no State has ever defined murder to include the intentional dismemberment of a fetus to be murder? So what's the big deal with Roe-v-Wade then? |
#483
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: So no State has ever defined murder to include the intentional dismemberment of a fetus to be murder? So what's the big deal with Roe-v-Wade then? Some States did at one time. Roe-v-Wade invalidated all of those laws. George Patterson None of us is as dumb as all of us. |
#484
|
|||
|
|||
"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... Some States did at one time. Roe-v-Wade invalidated all of those laws. Then murder is NOT a legal definition made by the State. |
#485
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... Some States did at one time. Roe-v-Wade invalidated all of those laws. Then murder is NOT a legal definition made by the State. YES IT IS. Countries are States. George Patterson None of us is as dumb as all of us. |
#486
|
|||
|
|||
EDR wrote in
: This coming from an anonymous poster... You may need to meet a hot lonely girl with your cheapest viagra on the net but but I do not (for simpletons read: SpAm).. You got something to say to me .. say it here... |
#487
|
|||
|
|||
Oh, you mean like the 150+ executions that occurred in Texas while the
current US president was governor of that state? -- 150 individuals found GUILTY of a CAPITOL crime by a JURY of their PEERS that invoked the LAW as PASSED by the PEOPLE which sent them to their DEATH... Damn glad a Govenor actually did the peoples will, I watched a comedian on last night and he had a Texas bit that went something like....theres a sign when you drive into texas with a guy in a Electric Chair and the caption sayd "y'all dont **** up now.. ya hear!".. while it was a joke it was a strong statement to those that want to commit crimes in The Great State of Texas... they will deal with you!!.. instead they goto California or NY where liberals will hug you for your murderous and vilolent ways, Lord knows it couldn't be your fault....Public hangings will go a long way! ;-) |
#488
|
|||
|
|||
|
#489
|
|||
|
|||
"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... YES IT IS. Countries are States. So murder in the US is a federal crime? It's outside the jurisdiction of the States? |
#490
|
|||
|
|||
The overwhelming majority of abortions are murder. Some isn't all. Even "most" isn't all. And all is is. Jose Holy crap Bill Clinton posts in this group... a new definition of what 'is' is Read carefully. It's actually a definition of "all". Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Dover short pilots since vaccine order | Roman Bystrianyk | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 29th 04 12:47 AM |
Pilot's Political Orientation | Chicken Bone | Owning | 314 | June 21st 04 06:10 PM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | General Aviation | 3 | December 23rd 03 08:53 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |