A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

New Aircraft



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 31st 08, 10:55 PM posted to rec.aviation.military.naval
Jim[_10_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21
Default New Aircraft

Lets get this newsgroup back on topic. So for starters a question to
our retired and other non-active naval aviators:

Which aircraft would you have most wanted to fly that wasn't yet
available during your days as a Naval Aviator? Why?




--
ACC USN ret
NKX BIKF NAB CV-63 NIR
67-69 69-71 71-74 77-80 80-85
&
74-77

founder of newsgroup - RAMN
  #2  
Old February 1st 08, 10:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.military.naval
Frank Minich
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default New Aircraft

"Jim" wrote in message
...

Which aircraft would you have most wanted to fly that wasn't yet
available during your days as a Naval Aviator? Why?



Does that include the days as a Student Naval Aviator?

If so: T-28
It didn't look like a pregnant guppy.


  #3  
Old February 3rd 08, 10:09 PM posted to rec.aviation.military.naval
J.McEachen[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default New Aircraft

The Martin P6M SeaMaster.
I watched its development while in college, its role as a sea-based long
range jet bomber, maritime patrol plane, and eventually its recasting as
an aerial mine layer to (try and) escape Air Force criticism (as it was
impinging on the AF's self-designed, exclusive role in strategic
bombing,) would have given it a global mission limited only by seaplane
tender location and, of course, local sea states. It was a magnificent
flying machine killed by unfortunate incidents in its testing phase and
AF jealousy as strategic roles developed in the late 1950's. USN killed
it as a fight not worth fighting.
J. McEachen VAH-5


Jim wrote:
Lets get this newsgroup back on topic. So for starters a question to
our retired and other non-active naval aviators:

Which aircraft would you have most wanted to fly that wasn't yet
available during your days as a Naval Aviator? Why?

  #4  
Old February 4th 08, 01:37 AM posted to rec.aviation.military.naval
Mr.Smartypants[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 23
Default New Aircraft

On Jan 31, 3:55*pm, Jim wrote:
Lets get this newsgroup back on topic. *So for starters a question to
our retired and other non-active naval aviators:

Which aircraft would you have most wanted to fly that wasn't yet
available during your days as a Naval Aviator? *Why?

--
* * * * * *ACC *USN ret
* NKX * *BIKF * NAB * CV-63 * NIR
67-69 * 69-71 *71-74 *77-80 * 80-85
* *&
74-77

* *founder of newsgroup - RAMN



Blimps.........because they are serene.

  #5  
Old February 4th 08, 04:16 PM posted to rec.aviation.military.naval
B.C. MALLAM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16
Default New Aircraft

I agree on the T-28, having flown it as a student and then again for three
years as a Maint. Test pilot it was just a lot of fun. Flew it all over the
country on cross countries.



On 2/1/08 4:56 PM, in article , "Frank Minich"
wrote:

"Jim" wrote in message
...

Which aircraft would you have most wanted to fly that wasn't yet
available during your days as a Naval Aviator? Why?



Does that include the days as a Student Naval Aviator?

If so: T-28
It didn't look like a pregnant guppy.





--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  #6  
Old February 6th 08, 05:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.military.naval
John[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 101
Default New Aircraft

If we can expand the scope of the question to those denied their dream
by lousy vision (and hey, it turned out great anyways) . . . I think I
would have loved to flown the A-4 (fun to fly) A-6 (great aircraft) ,
or despite all of its warts, the A-5 (sexy at zero knots and zero
altitude). Make me choose one . . . the A-6.

Take care . . .

John
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"War of the Worlds" Aircraft - Liaison aircraft William R Thompson Aviation Photos 12 June 1st 07 08:47 PM
Solar powered aircraft. Was: Can Aircraft Be Far Behind? Jim Logajan Piloting 4 February 9th 07 01:11 PM
Delaware LLC Owned Aircraft California Based Aircraft ChrisEllis Piloting 6 January 17th 06 03:47 AM
Commercial rating: complex aircraft required aircraft for practical test? Marc J. Zeitlin Piloting 22 November 24th 05 04:11 AM
Experience transitioning from C-172 to complex aircraft as potential first owned aircraft? Jack Allison Owning 12 June 14th 04 08:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.