A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Accident Statistics: Certified vs. Non-Certified Engines



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 9th 04, 08:21 AM
Ron Wanttaja
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Accident Statistics: Certified vs. Non-Certified Engines

A while back, I posted the result of a cursory look at the accident
statistics for aircraft powered by auto engine conversions. It *was* an
awful shallow pass, and at the time I promised to look into the issue
deeper.

I have since obtained the NTSB accident databases for the years 1998, 1999,
and 2000, and am ready to provide more exact figures.

The nice thing about the accident databases is that they usually describe
the type of engine that powers the aircraft. Unfortunately, the FAA
registration database is a lot more vague. A lot homebuilts are merely
described as having experimental engines; a number don't even have an
entry. So we can't do the classic "x% of auto engined-airplanes have
accidents every year vs. y% Lycont-powered planes."

Instead, we can take another tack: We can catalog the number of each type
of engine in accident aircraft, then take a look at how often a loss of
engine power was a factor in the accident. The figures don't include cases
where the cause was traced to carburetor ice or the pilot running out of
fuel.

Presentation of data:

The "ENGINE" column describes the general category of the engine, one of
four types:

"Certified" Engines include Continentals, Lycomings, Franklins, Pratt
and Whitney, Jacobs, Vendeyev, LOM, and Walter.

"Auto" Engines include those identified as Subarus, Suzukis, Fords,
Volkswagens, Revmaster, Chevrolet, GM, Mazda, Honda, Stratus, or NSI.

"Non-C/4" are four-cylinder, non-certified, non-auto conversion
engines. They include the Rotax 912 series, the Jabiru, and the Rotorway.

"Two-Stokes" include Rotax 4* and 5* series, Yamahas, KFMs, Hirth, 2SI,
and Cuyuna.

The next column is "ACC". This is the number of accidents in the 1998-2000
timeframe that involved each category of engine

"PCT" is the percent of the total accidents where that category of engine
was installed.

"LOP" are the number of accidents where loss of engine power was involved.

"LOP%" is the percentage of cases where accidents involving aircraft
mounting that category of engine suffered an engine-related loss of power.

---------------------------------------------------------
The Results:

ENGINE ACC PCT LOP LOP%
------ --- --- --- ----
Certified 332 51% 57 17%
Auto 95 15% 27 28%
Non-C/4 70 11% 13 19%
Two-Strokes 134 21% 46 34%

Of primary interest here, I think is the percentage of accidents where a
loss of engine power occured...17% for certified-engine-powered planes, vs.
28% for auto-engine conversions. Two-strokes were even higher; almost a
third of their accidents involved a power failure.

It's interesting to note the non-certified four strokes are doing
practically as well as the certified engines. The Rotax 912/914 series
alone does even better... a LOP% value of 13%.

An interesting side note: Lycomings outnumbered Continentals by nearly
four to one....

Ron Wanttaja




  #2  
Old January 9th 04, 09:11 AM
David O
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ron Wanttaja wrote:

The Results:

ENGINE ACC PCT LOP LOP%
------ --- --- --- ----
Certified 332 51% 57 17%
Auto 95 15% 27 28%
Non-C/4 70 11% 13 19%
Two-Strokes 134 21% 46 34%



Thanks for taking the time and effort to compile this data. One small
correction, the certified PCT should be 53% (52.61%) based on your
numbers.

David O -- http://www.AirplaneZone.com


  #3  
Old January 9th 04, 04:48 PM
Ron Wanttaja
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 03:11:48 -0500, David O
wrote:

Ron Wanttaja wrote:

The Results:

ENGINE ACC PCT LOP LOP%
------ --- --- --- ----
Certified 332 51% 57 17%
Auto 95 15% 27 28%
Non-C/4 70 11% 13 19%
Two-Strokes 134 21% 46 34%



Thanks for taking the time and effort to compile this data. One small
correction, the certified PCT should be 53% (52.61%) based on your
numbers.


Thanks, you're right. I was actually adding two numbers on the fly
(US-manufactured and foreign-manufactured) and did it wrong.

Ron Wanttaja

  #4  
Old January 9th 04, 05:34 PM
Russell Kent
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ron Wanttaja wrote:

"Non-C/4" are four-cylinder, non-certified, non-auto conversion
engines. They include the Rotax 912 series, the Jabiru, and the Rotorway.


Did you really mean to say "... are four-STROKE, non-certified, ..." ?

Russell Kent

  #5  
Old January 10th 04, 03:46 AM
Ron Wanttaja
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 10:34:26 -0600, Russell Kent wrote:

Ron Wanttaja wrote:

"Non-C/4" are four-cylinder, non-certified, non-auto conversion
engines. They include the Rotax 912 series, the Jabiru, and the Rotorway.


Did you really mean to say "... are four-STROKE, non-certified, ..." ?


Yep. 'Nother slip, 'tween Excel and the Net....

Ron Wanttaja

  #6  
Old January 10th 04, 03:54 AM
Rich S.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 10:34:26 -0600, Russell Kent wrote:

Did you really mean to say "... are four-STROKE, non-certified, ..." ?


Did you really mean to say "... are four-STROKE *CYCLE*, non-certified, ..."
?

Rich "BOb noticed it, I'm sure" S.


  #7  
Old January 10th 04, 04:31 AM
Ron Wanttaja
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 18:54:04 -0800, "Rich S."
wrote:

On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 10:34:26 -0600, Russell Kent wrote:

Did you really mean to say "... are four-STROKE, non-certified, ..." ?


Did you really mean to say "... are four-STROKE *CYCLE*, non-certified, ..."?


Evahbuddy's a critic. :-)

To make it clear, there were three engines that fit that particular
category:

Jabiru
Rotorway
Rotax/Bombardier 9XX series

Ron Wanttaja

  #8  
Old January 10th 04, 08:23 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ron Wanttaja" wrote

Evahbuddy's a critic. :-)

To make it clear, there were three engines that fit that particular
category:

Jabiru
Rotorway
Rotax/Bombardier 9XX series

Ron Wanttaja

WWeeeeeelllllll,
actually, the Rotax 912 has been certified, also, right?

Otherwise, good work. g
--
Jim in NC


  #9  
Old January 10th 04, 01:40 PM
RU ok
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Did you really mean to say "... are four-STROKE, non-certified, ..." ?


Did you really mean to say "... are four-STROKE *CYCLE*, non-certified, ..."
?

Rich "BOb noticed it, I'm sure" S.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Yep.
Rich is a winner.
Give the man a bottle of Geritol and 120 tablets of Ex-lax.

For our less than savvy youngsters....

http://geritol.com/
http://www.manekineko.us/catalog/pro...83&language=en



Barnyard BOb
  #10  
Old January 10th 04, 01:44 PM
RU ok
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Rich "BOb noticed it, I'm sure" S.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Yep.
Rich is a winner.
Give the man a bottle of Geritol and 120 tablets of Ex-lax.

For our less than savvy youngsters....

http://geritol.com/
http://www.manekineko.us/catalog/pro...83&language=en



Barnyard BOb --- a really 'regular' guy

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 03:26 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 1 January 2nd 04 10:02 PM
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 41 November 20th 03 06:39 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 4 August 7th 03 05:12 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 July 4th 03 04:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.