A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

NetJets Layoff



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old July 5th 06, 02:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,632
Default NetJets Layoff

We all had access to any aircraft's information.

A gold mine. Nobody put two and two together?


As I wrote previously, I could only see one side of the equation. I
realized the investment potential, but didn't know the details.


To actually do so would be unethical and perhaps illegal, but I'm still
surprised it didn't happen. When you say "I could only see one
side...", is that because of your position? (would dispatchers have
been able to, had they thought of it?)

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #32  
Old July 5th 06, 03:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
john smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,446
Default NetJets Layoff

In article ,
Jose wrote:

We all had access to any aircraft's information.


A gold mine. Nobody put two and two together?


As I wrote previously, I could only see one side of the equation. I
realized the investment potential, but didn't know the details.


To actually do so would be unethical and perhaps illegal, but I'm still
surprised it didn't happen. When you say "I could only see one
side...", is that because of your position? (would dispatchers have
been able to, had they thought of it?)


One could speculate as to the target business found in the visited city
based on the businesses conducted by the client. Given the potential for
diversification, there really is no way to be certain. I suppose the
flight crew might hear something and could pass it on, but I have no
idea as to the legal issues that could be raised.
Ethically, it's all about money. If I am speculating, based on knowing
that representatives from company A is visiting city X, it is my risk.
For all I know, they could be preparing to sponsor a golf tournament.
  #33  
Old July 5th 06, 04:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,632
Default NetJets Layoff

One could speculate as to the target business found in the visited city
based on the businesses conducted by the client.


The more interesting case is when two execs from different businesses
land within half an hour of each other at a third city, when a deal
between them might move the market.

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #34  
Old July 5th 06, 05:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gig 601XL Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,317
Default NetJets Layoff


"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...


The stockholders would certainly have an interest in knowing.


Well, you think maybe the management will let them know without having to
blab to the media?




If it's a publicly held company you can't do one without the other.



  #35  
Old July 5th 06, 05:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gig 601XL Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,317
Default NetJets Layoff


"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
ups.com...
depending what was in the contract they signed... I'm sure a few lawyers
will be interested in these "voluntary resignations"..

that means they can't collect un employment benefits


These folks will all get unemployment benefits, whether they are
eligible or not.

Remember: The bureacrats who run our government aren't interested in
fixing problems. On the contrary, they depend on more and more people
needing their help, in order to thrive. They therefore have an
unstoppable will (and, sadly, unchecked ability) to bring more people
into their care -- and this provides them with absolute job security.

I've seen the system in action (in Iowa and Wisconsin), and it is a
farce. If it weren't so sad, it would be laughable.

And we ALL pay for it, in the long run.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


Then you just aren't answering the forms correctly. One of my duties is
fighting unemployment claims on behalf of our clients. If you answer
correctly and keep your ducks in a row the claims are usually refused when
they should be. I do this for clients in several states. Most states deny UI
claims if the employee quit or was terminated for misconduct.

The biggest mistake employers make is trying to be "Nice Guys" and telling
an employee who is being terminated for, as an example, excessive
absenteeism, "Gee, Jay, we just don't need you anymore."


  #36  
Old July 5th 06, 08:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default NetJets Layoff

You don't pay for unemployment benefits, the companies do in the form
of unemployment insurance premiums.

Jay Honeck wrote:
depending what was in the contract they signed... I'm sure a few lawyers
will be interested in these "voluntary resignations"..

that means they can't collect un employment benefits


These folks will all get unemployment benefits, whether they are
eligible or not.

Remember: The bureacrats who run our government aren't interested in
fixing problems. On the contrary, they depend on more and more people
needing their help, in order to thrive. They therefore have an
unstoppable will (and, sadly, unchecked ability) to bring more people
into their care -- and this provides them with absolute job security.

I've seen the system in action (in Iowa and Wisconsin), and it is a
farce. If it weren't so sad, it would be laughable.

And we ALL pay for it, in the long run.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #38  
Old July 5th 06, 08:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default NetJets Layoff

Then why have unemployment benefits at all?

Javier wrote:
In the long run, as Jay said, we all pay for it, since the cost of those
premiums is passed on to us consumers.

-jav


  #39  
Old July 5th 06, 08:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,632
Default NetJets Layoff

Then why have unemployment benefits at all?

For the same reason we have any insurance - spread the risk.

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #40  
Old July 5th 06, 09:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
john smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,446
Default NetJets Layoff

Joe, as you become more familiar with this group (if some of them don't
drive you off), you will recognize that the same few individuals will
take the original subjects off topic on a consistant basis. :-)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
resume flying after 25 year layoff David Banahan Instrument Flight Rules 10 September 21st 04 06:18 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.