|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
July 16th 12, 07:09 PM
posted to rec.aviation.soaring
|
|||
|
|||
Ls8 vs SZD--55
Carbon acts as a barrier to radio waves... which is why some carbon gliders
have glass fins, so the Radio Antenna can work. The Nimbus 3 has a carbon fin and a BNC connector to the Antenna which is in the rudder, which is GRP...!.. Make sense..?. At 17:58 16 July 2012, wrote: W dniu poniedzia=C5=82ek, 16 lipca 2012 19:22:03 UTC+2 u=C5=BCytkownik (Nie= znane) napisa=C5=82: On Sunday, July 15, 2012 11:59:51 PM UTC-7, wrote: "55 - no carbon anythig ls8 carbonwings etc" What does this translate to? =20 As to the condition of a ship: I compared prices of the new ones... =20 It translates into much easier placement of Spot, GPS, transponder, and F= LARM. Can you please explain how using different materials affects easier placeme= nt of GPS, FLARM etc?=20 
|
|
#12
July 16th 12, 11:00 PM
posted to rec.aviation.soaring
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ls8 vs SZD--55
Makes perfec sense
 .All in all, top competition aside the choice seems to have simplified considarably. In favour of SZD-55... S
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
