If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Akaflieg Karlsruhe AK-X
Yep, as I said in a post above, the oscillation was damped with an aft, but then the stall characteristics turned to nasty. Most of this nastiness was cause by spanwise flow during stall which caused the whole wing to stall very rapidly. We then installed the boundary layer fences (iirc two per wing), and things improved.
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Akaflieg Karlsruhe AK-X
Le jeudi 14 décembre 2017 06:40:58 UTC+1, Tango Whisky a écritÂ*:
Yep, as I said in a post above, the oscillation was damped with an aft, but then the stall characteristics turned to nasty. Most of this nastiness was cause by spanwise flow during stall which caused the whole wing to stall very rapidly. We then installed the boundary layer fences (iirc two per wing), and things improved. That should read aft cg. There actually was another nasty effect (which probably will happen with the AK-X, too): During the ground run of the aerotow, the SB13 would lift of before the tug (as usual with sailplanes). It would then eventually fly through the vortex which the tug leaves on the runway after rotation and pitch into the ground. This happened on the (inofficial) first flight, and the relation between vortex and pitch down was discovered on the video - there has been a thin layer of snow on the runway which made the vortex visible. Same would happen if during tow the SB13 reached a somewhat low position and came to contact the downwash of the tug's wing and its vortex - the glider would pitch down and could only be stabilized in a typical low tow position. So the counter measure was to aerotow with a long rope (80-100 m), brief the tug pilot to do a gentle rotation/lift-off, and stay in low tow position troughout the tow. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Akaflieg Karlsruhe AK-X
At 05:10 13 December 2017, Michael Opitz wrote:
At 00:34 13 December 2017, Andreas Maurer wrote: And, second question: Do you know if the Horton guys ever considered winglets instead of the drag ailerons? Andreas, I just got my copy of the book. The only Horten design which I found using winglets (although they were ~2-3 meters inboard of the tips) was on a 4 engine transport, the Ae. 38. The rudders only moved in the outboard direction, and were controlled by aerodynamic servo tabs. It only flew once due to being forced (by nationalistic pride) to use engines that had only 40% of the power that the aircraft was designed for. It had 30 cubic meters of storage space. The Ae. 38 was conceived of in 1950 in Argentina. It eventually flew there in 1960 and was then scrapped. JJ, Sorry I didn't answer about your crosswind question earlier. I'm afraid that I don't know the answer to it though. Unless I find something about it in the book, anything I would say at this point would only be speculation except that I don't remember Dad addressing crosswind landings in the Ho IV. The Me 163 had a rudder like the Genesis and a much higher approach speed, so it handled crosswinds like most other aircraft, except when it had been flown so fast that the transonic flutter had caused the rudder to disintegrate so badly that only the front spar/hinge was left. Dad found that result on approach as he tried to slip it with no result after one particularly high speed flight... RO |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Slots available at the Spring 2017 Akaflieg Arnold | Bob Kuykendall | Soaring | 0 | March 22nd 17 04:59 PM |
Akaflieg Arnold Winter 2017 | Bob Kuykendall | Soaring | 0 | December 21st 16 12:45 AM |
Genesis 2 Akaflieg polar | Chris Wedgwood[_2_] | Soaring | 8 | November 22nd 16 12:30 PM |
Akaflieg Karlsruhe AK-X | Jonathan St. Cloud | Soaring | 20 | March 2nd 16 06:55 PM |