A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Constant speed prop oil leak



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 19th 04, 02:58 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 18:17:24 -0700, Jim Weir wrote:

snipped for length, not for content.

On the other hand, they have to pull it apart anyway, so why not just do the
overhaul for the price of a couple of hours of labor and some dollar parts?


Was lucky to have a prop shop next door for a few years, will only add
a few thoughts.

On the older McCauley's, at overhaul, the blades have to be unscrewed
from the ferrules (sp?) and inspected. The longer it has been since
this has been done, the more difficult it is, and the more likely you
are to find problems. The newer McCauley hub designs are stone-simple
and relatively easy to o-haul. The only real down side would be blade
rework/inspection (material removed working toward min specs). I would
agree that on a McCauley in most cases overhaul would be the way to
go.

If you've got a common compact hub Hartzell (not applicable in this
particular case), "overhaul" means they have to roll the blade shanks
near the butt and then polish to remove the roll "marks". There is
also a min. diameter for the blade shanks. As above, there are also
requirements for blade rework (accompanied by another set of min
specs). For 91 operators, I've always recommended a 5 year (max)
tear-down, hub corrosion inspection, and re-seal.

FWIW, there were always a lot fewer scrapped parts coming out of the
McCauley end of the shop than the Hartzell end. Corrosion from
infrequent inspection/improper lubrication being the primary issue.

Never saw a corrosion problem inside the Hartzell props on "working"
airplanes (greased every 100 hrs/2-3 months, o-hauled every 3-4
years). Always thought that a grease job every 100 hrs/6 months
(regardless of hours in the air) would be a good idea for relatively
in-frequent flyers.

TC

snip

  #2  
Old April 19th 04, 04:15 AM
Ben Jackson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
wrote:
Never saw a corrosion problem inside the Hartzell props on "working"
airplanes (greased every 100 hrs/2-3 months, o-hauled every 3-4
years). Always thought that a grease job every 100 hrs/6 months
(regardless of hours in the air) would be a good idea for relatively
in-frequent flyers.


Should grease be added until it flows cleanly from the removed zerk side,
or just until "some" grease comes out?

--
Ben Jackson

http://www.ben.com/
  #3  
Old April 19th 04, 05:25 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 03:15:08 GMT, (Ben Jackson) wrote:

In article ,
wrote:
Never saw a corrosion problem inside the Hartzell props on "working"
airplanes (greased every 100 hrs/2-3 months, o-hauled every 3-4
years). Always thought that a grease job every 100 hrs/6 months
(regardless of hours in the air) would be a good idea for relatively
in-frequent flyers.


Should grease be added until it flows cleanly from the removed zerk side,
or just until "some" grease comes out?


Depends on the installation.

What follows is personal preference for servicing Hartzell compact-hub
props, in no way supported by applicable maintenance documentation.
Worth just what you paid for it. Follow at your own risk.

Hartzell useta tell you to add a "little", sorry don't remember the
exact amount. With the guns we used, it worked out to about 4
"pumps".

Main thing to remember is to add the grease s-l-o-w-l-y, never use a
pneumatic-assisted gun.

If a similiar amount of decent looking grease comes out the
opposite/removed zerk, stop.

If after a shot or two, decent looking grease starts coming out, stop.

If after 4 shots, nothing comes out, 4 more, decent looking grease,
stop.

If the grease looks kinda crappy, carefully & slowly add until it
cleans up. Prop probably needs attention (see t-prop below for
exceptions).

In some cases, grease will not come out. This means that you are
filling the "dry" hub with grease. Prop definitely needs attention.

On turbo-prop applications, 8 times out of 10, the grease will be
compromised. Often will expel water with the grease, or show signs of
water contamination. If the prop is serviced on a regular basis,
carefully "flushing" the cavity with clean grease, it will likely
survive the next o-haul without major corrosion issues.

Only other thing notable is that any Hartzell compact hub prop
installed new (or after o-haul) should be run up to TO rpm, exercised
several times, and the hub cavities "topped off" with grease. Not sure
if that's in the "book" or not. In this case, opposite zerk is
removed, and grease added until excess is seen. Can take a little or a
lot.

Finally, if getting a Dy-Bal performed on a H/CH prop, make sure to
grease it first, just in case someone forgot to "top it off".

Hope this helps;

TC

  #4  
Old April 19th 04, 10:38 PM
DP
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 22:58:58 GMT, DP wrote:

follow up

This was a new prop back in 1994/5 (don't have my logs right here).
The last owner bellied it in so the engine was overhauled and a new
prop put on. I didn't see any overhaul tags anywhere for this prop,
but I KNOW nothing has been done to it the last three years I've
owned it.

My A&P said today the prop "appears" fine, and it should only need new
seals, but we won't know until Friday when the prop shop takes it
apart. I took it off the plane this morning, and the prop shop is
picking it up tommorow as they have other to drop off/pick up.

The A&P tells me between 3-5K for an overhaul, and that the blades are
in great shape. We'll see I guess. I'll post more when I find out
more.
Don Paquette
PP-ASEL
N9723X
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PA28: Difference in constant speed prop vs fixed pitch Nathan Young Owning 25 October 10th 04 04:41 AM
Is there a minimum prop speed? Jim Carter Owning 2 June 29th 04 01:49 AM
Why do constant speed power setting charts limit RPM? Ben Jackson Piloting 6 April 16th 04 03:41 AM
Practicing SFLs with a constant speed prop - how? Ed Piloting 22 April 16th 04 02:42 AM
Constant Speed Prop vs Variable Engine Timing Jay Home Built 44 March 3rd 04 10:08 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.