If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Logging Approach Question
Tonight I was flying back to SQL GPS 30. There was a dense, 100' thick ceiling covering half the airport at 800' AGL/MSL. I was in VMC the whole time yet it probably would have been illegal to fly in VFR as I would have been close to the clouds (see note below about this). So even though visibility was 10nm below the clouds, only have the airport had the ceiling and I never passed through any clouds, I presume I can still log this as an approach in "actual." So can you actually log an approach in actual and never go through IMC? Sounds strange but I guess you are able to do this. Same goes passing through a broken layer. Note: my passenger picked out a plane probably at about 600' flying from PAO to SQL while I was on final. I called out on CTAF (tower was closed) and didn't hear anything. I wouldn't be surprised they kept hush knowing they were breaking the regulations. I had not cancelled IFR and was on the approach and ended up doing a 360 and climbing. I contacted approach immediately telling him what I was doing but it could have caused a go around for a heavy if there was an inbound a/c going into SFO. Fortunately no one was around. Fortunately my passenger saw the traffic as they were below me, I was in a low wing, night, with clouds around and I wasn't expecting him. Gerald |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 07:05:48 GMT, Gerald Sylvester
wrote: So can you actually log an approach in actual and never go through IMC? Huh? What definitions are you using for "actual" and "IMC"? Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I wojuld say no. You made a vistual approach in VMC.
Mike MU-2 "Gerald Sylvester" wrote in message m... Tonight I was flying back to SQL GPS 30. There was a dense, 100' thick ceiling covering half the airport at 800' AGL/MSL. I was in VMC the whole time yet it probably would have been illegal to fly in VFR as I would have been close to the clouds (see note below about this). So even though visibility was 10nm below the clouds, only have the airport had the ceiling and I never passed through any clouds, I presume I can still log this as an approach in "actual." So can you actually log an approach in actual and never go through IMC? Sounds strange but I guess you are able to do this. Same goes passing through a broken layer. Note: my passenger picked out a plane probably at about 600' flying from PAO to SQL while I was on final. I called out on CTAF (tower was closed) and didn't hear anything. I wouldn't be surprised they kept hush knowing they were breaking the regulations. I had not cancelled IFR and was on the approach and ended up doing a 360 and climbing. I contacted approach immediately telling him what I was doing but it could have caused a go around for a heavy if there was an inbound a/c going into SFO. Fortunately no one was around. Fortunately my passenger saw the traffic as they were below me, I was in a low wing, night, with clouds around and I wasn't expecting him. Gerald |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Mike Rapoport wrote:
I wojuld say no. You made a vistual approach in VMC. It was not a 'visual approach.' I required a GPS approach but the approach kept me in VMC that was below VFR.... (500 below, 1000 feet above, etc. for each airspace). Gerald |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Gerald Sylvester wrote:
Mike Rapoport wrote: I wojuld say no. You made a vistual approach in VMC. It was not a 'visual approach.' I required a GPS approach but the approach kept me in VMC that was below VFR.... (500 below, 1000 feet above, etc. for each airspace). Could you control the aircraft using outside references (only)? Hilton |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Hilton wrote:
Could you control the aircraft using outside references (only)? I could see the cloud layer and I could see the lights through the haze so for the most yes. could I see a defined horizon, definitely not as there are many black hills, the San francisco bay that was black and it was night time. And the airport was obscurred until turning onto the FA Course as the initial approach course was over the black clouds. So overall, really this is a grey area. I'm definitely leaning towards that I can't count it even though I highly depended on it. Part of the issue was that I was not free to fly anywhere due to the SFO Bravo pushing down onto the cloud layer. It shouldn't matter all that much as I did 5 partial panel with failed GPS approach a couple of weeks earlier under the hood. Being new to the game, I don't plan on letting my skills deteriorate from lack of use. thanks everyone. Gerald |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Gerald wrote:
So overall, really this is a grey area. Sure sounds like it. BTW: Wasn't that SQL GPS marked N/A for a really long time, or am I thinking of another approach? Hilton |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
You did not have to fly soley by reference to instruments, so it was a
visual approach even though it was below VFR minimiums. If you didn't even have to look at the instruments, I don't see how it could be considered an actual instrument approach. Mike MU-2 "Gerald Sylvester" wrote in message . .. Mike Rapoport wrote: I wojuld say no. You made a vistual approach in VMC. It was not a 'visual approach.' I required a GPS approach but the approach kept me in VMC that was below VFR.... (500 below, 1000 feet above, etc. for each airspace). Gerald |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Gerald Sylvester" wrote in message . .. It was not a 'visual approach.' I required a GPS approach but the approach kept me in VMC that was below VFR.... (500 below, 1000 feet above, etc. for each airspace). You described VFR conditions. Why did you require the GPS approach? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Of course not. Surprised that you would ask the question.
Bob Gardner "Gerald Sylvester" wrote in message m... Tonight I was flying back to SQL GPS 30. There was a dense, 100' thick ceiling covering half the airport at 800' AGL/MSL. I was in VMC the whole time yet it probably would have been illegal to fly in VFR as I would have been close to the clouds (see note below about this). So even though visibility was 10nm below the clouds, only have the airport had the ceiling and I never passed through any clouds, I presume I can still log this as an approach in "actual." So can you actually log an approach in actual and never go through IMC? Sounds strange but I guess you are able to do this. Same goes passing through a broken layer. Note: my passenger picked out a plane probably at about 600' flying from PAO to SQL while I was on final. I called out on CTAF (tower was closed) and didn't hear anything. I wouldn't be surprised they kept hush knowing they were breaking the regulations. I had not cancelled IFR and was on the approach and ended up doing a 360 and climbing. I contacted approach immediately telling him what I was doing but it could have caused a go around for a heavy if there was an inbound a/c going into SFO. Fortunately no one was around. Fortunately my passenger saw the traffic as they were below me, I was in a low wing, night, with clouds around and I wasn't expecting him. Gerald |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPS approach question | Matt Whiting | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | August 29th 08 03:54 AM |
Contact approach question | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 114 | January 31st 05 06:40 PM |
Logging Flight Time Question | Phoenix Pilot | Piloting | 1 | June 13th 04 06:23 PM |
Where is the FAF on the GPS 23 approach to KUCP? | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 36 | April 16th 04 12:41 PM |
Study pilot workload during approach and landing | Freshfighter | Piloting | 5 | December 7th 03 04:06 PM |