A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Logging Approach Question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 8th 05, 08:05 AM
Gerald Sylvester
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Logging Approach Question


Tonight I was flying back to SQL GPS 30. There was a dense, 100' thick
ceiling covering half the airport at 800' AGL/MSL. I was
in VMC the whole time yet it probably would have been illegal
to fly in VFR as I would have been close to the clouds (see note
below about this). So even though visibility was 10nm below
the clouds, only have the airport had the ceiling and I never
passed through any clouds, I presume I can still log this
as an approach in "actual."

So can you actually log an approach in actual and never go through
IMC? Sounds strange but I guess you are able to do this. Same
goes passing through a broken layer.


Note: my passenger picked out a plane probably at about 600' flying
from PAO to SQL while I was on final. I called out on CTAF (tower
was closed) and didn't hear anything. I wouldn't be surprised
they kept hush knowing they were breaking the regulations. I
had not cancelled IFR and was on the approach and ended up doing
a 360 and climbing. I contacted approach immediately telling him
what I was doing but it could have caused a go around for a heavy
if there was an inbound a/c going into SFO. Fortunately
no one was around. Fortunately my passenger saw the traffic
as they were below me, I was in a low wing, night, with clouds
around and I wasn't expecting him.

Gerald

  #2  
Old September 8th 05, 12:34 PM
Ron Rosenfeld
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 07:05:48 GMT, Gerald Sylvester
wrote:

So can you actually log an approach in actual and never go through
IMC?


Huh?

What definitions are you using for "actual" and "IMC"?


Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA)
  #3  
Old September 8th 05, 03:02 PM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I wojuld say no. You made a vistual approach in VMC.

Mike
MU-2


"Gerald Sylvester" wrote in message
m...

Tonight I was flying back to SQL GPS 30. There was a dense, 100' thick
ceiling covering half the airport at 800' AGL/MSL. I was
in VMC the whole time yet it probably would have been illegal
to fly in VFR as I would have been close to the clouds (see note
below about this). So even though visibility was 10nm below
the clouds, only have the airport had the ceiling and I never
passed through any clouds, I presume I can still log this
as an approach in "actual."

So can you actually log an approach in actual and never go through
IMC? Sounds strange but I guess you are able to do this. Same
goes passing through a broken layer.


Note: my passenger picked out a plane probably at about 600' flying
from PAO to SQL while I was on final. I called out on CTAF (tower
was closed) and didn't hear anything. I wouldn't be surprised
they kept hush knowing they were breaking the regulations. I
had not cancelled IFR and was on the approach and ended up doing
a 360 and climbing. I contacted approach immediately telling him
what I was doing but it could have caused a go around for a heavy
if there was an inbound a/c going into SFO. Fortunately
no one was around. Fortunately my passenger saw the traffic
as they were below me, I was in a low wing, night, with clouds
around and I wasn't expecting him.

Gerald



  #4  
Old September 9th 05, 03:02 AM
Gerald Sylvester
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mike Rapoport wrote:
I wojuld say no. You made a vistual approach in VMC.


It was not a 'visual approach.' I required a GPS approach
but the approach kept me in VMC that was below VFR....
(500 below, 1000 feet above, etc. for each airspace).

Gerald
  #5  
Old September 9th 05, 07:23 AM
Hilton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Gerald Sylvester wrote:
Mike Rapoport wrote:
I wojuld say no. You made a vistual approach in VMC.


It was not a 'visual approach.' I required a GPS approach
but the approach kept me in VMC that was below VFR....
(500 below, 1000 feet above, etc. for each airspace).


Could you control the aircraft using outside references (only)?

Hilton


  #6  
Old September 9th 05, 08:38 AM
Gerald Sylvester
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hilton wrote:
Could you control the aircraft using outside references (only)?


I could see the cloud layer and I could see the lights through the haze
so for the most yes. could I see a defined horizon, definitely
not as there are many black hills, the San francisco bay that was
black and it was night time. And the airport was obscurred until
turning onto the FA Course as the initial approach course was
over the black clouds.

So overall, really this is a grey area. I'm definitely leaning
towards that I can't count it even though I highly depended on it.
Part of the issue was that I was not free to fly anywhere
due to the SFO Bravo pushing down onto the cloud layer.
It shouldn't matter all that
much as I did 5 partial panel with failed GPS approach a couple
of weeks earlier under the hood. Being new to the game, I don't
plan on letting my skills deteriorate from lack of use.

thanks everyone.

Gerald
  #7  
Old September 9th 05, 09:11 AM
Hilton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Gerald wrote:
So overall, really this is a grey area.


Sure sounds like it.

BTW: Wasn't that SQL GPS marked N/A for a really long time, or am I thinking
of another approach?

Hilton


  #8  
Old September 12th 05, 03:23 PM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You did not have to fly soley by reference to instruments, so it was a
visual approach even though it was below VFR minimiums. If you didn't even
have to look at the instruments, I don't see how it could be considered an
actual instrument approach.

Mike
MU-2


"Gerald Sylvester" wrote in message
. ..
Mike Rapoport wrote:
I wojuld say no. You made a vistual approach in VMC.


It was not a 'visual approach.' I required a GPS approach
but the approach kept me in VMC that was below VFR....
(500 below, 1000 feet above, etc. for each airspace).

Gerald



  #9  
Old September 12th 05, 04:56 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Gerald Sylvester" wrote in message
. ..

It was not a 'visual approach.' I required a GPS approach
but the approach kept me in VMC that was below VFR....
(500 below, 1000 feet above, etc. for each airspace).


You described VFR conditions. Why did you require the GPS approach?


  #10  
Old September 8th 05, 03:46 PM
Bob Gardner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Of course not. Surprised that you would ask the question.

Bob Gardner

"Gerald Sylvester" wrote in message
m...

Tonight I was flying back to SQL GPS 30. There was a dense, 100' thick
ceiling covering half the airport at 800' AGL/MSL. I was
in VMC the whole time yet it probably would have been illegal
to fly in VFR as I would have been close to the clouds (see note
below about this). So even though visibility was 10nm below
the clouds, only have the airport had the ceiling and I never
passed through any clouds, I presume I can still log this
as an approach in "actual."

So can you actually log an approach in actual and never go through
IMC? Sounds strange but I guess you are able to do this. Same
goes passing through a broken layer.


Note: my passenger picked out a plane probably at about 600' flying
from PAO to SQL while I was on final. I called out on CTAF (tower
was closed) and didn't hear anything. I wouldn't be surprised
they kept hush knowing they were breaking the regulations. I
had not cancelled IFR and was on the approach and ended up doing
a 360 and climbing. I contacted approach immediately telling him
what I was doing but it could have caused a go around for a heavy
if there was an inbound a/c going into SFO. Fortunately
no one was around. Fortunately my passenger saw the traffic
as they were below me, I was in a low wing, night, with clouds
around and I wasn't expecting him.

Gerald



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GPS approach question Matt Whiting Instrument Flight Rules 30 August 29th 08 03:54 AM
Contact approach question Paul Tomblin Instrument Flight Rules 114 January 31st 05 06:40 PM
Logging Flight Time Question Phoenix Pilot Piloting 1 June 13th 04 06:23 PM
Where is the FAF on the GPS 23 approach to KUCP? Richard Kaplan Instrument Flight Rules 36 April 16th 04 12:41 PM
Study pilot workload during approach and landing Freshfighter Piloting 5 December 7th 03 04:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.