A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Rotorcraft
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Presidential Helicopter



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #18  
Old March 25th 05, 01:47 PM
Helowriter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sorry, the Comanche mess was the Army's fault. They never funded it
fully, never froze the requirement, and allowed the thing to consume
the entire aviation budget.

Workfare for the primes? Who's fault was that? (See what I mean about
Weldon?) Boeing and Sikorsky never fought the Army to keep the thing on
a low burner. The Army insisted it needed the Comanche up to shortly
before the cancellation.

Can you blame the guys on the program for living in the Twilight Zone?
By all accounts the Comanche air vehicles flew as advertised. The
program just never had the money to integrate the air vehicle with the
all-important MEP. Waiting to cancel the thing just when the factory
was starting up was the Army's doing.

US101 and VH-92 off-the-shelf? Trouble is, all that is left is NOT
stuffing in the special avionics, EMI protection, etc. They so
gold-plated the requirement that both aircraft had to grow to carry all
the people and systems.

Navy assistant secretary White said both aircraft needed rotor and
drivetrain improvements to meet VXX objective requirements. That means
the EH101 gets a new rotor system, a new transmission and probably FBW
controls paid for by the US taxpayer. Fixes the Italians and the Brits
needed but couldn't afford will get done on our dime. That version then
gets marketed out of Italy (and the US) to meet future requirements.

China on the S-92? They saw a potentially big market, but I think the
PRC is more risk then reward.

HW

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flying high: Lockheed wins presidential helicopter contract [email protected] Naval Aviation 11 February 8th 05 02:20 PM
Flying high: Lockheed wins presidential helicopter contract [email protected] Rotorcraft 0 January 30th 05 03:48 AM
Lockheed wins Presidential helicopter contract Tiger Naval Aviation 0 January 29th 05 05:24 AM
Musings of a Commercial Helicopter Pilot Badwater Bill Home Built 6 February 27th 04 09:11 AM
Musings of a Commercial Helicopter Pilot Badwater Bill Rotorcraft 0 February 25th 04 06:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.