If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#361
|
|||
|
|||
$98 per barrel oil
Jay Honeck wrote in
: There is no reason to think we would. On the other hand Nikita Khrushchev said, "We will bury you!" I'm sure that Wolfgang and Thomas were taught that Khrushchev's famous line was referring only to being buried "economically"... It is to weep. You'd have made a great little porpogandist. You're very fond of putting words in peoples mouths. I suppose in the mind of someonewho thinks that siting in a go-kart while playing a nintendo is flying and who builds some sort of aviation disneland that's to be expected. Bertie |
#362
|
|||
|
|||
$98 per barrel oil
"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message .. . Wolfgang Schwanke wrote in : Bertie the Bunyip wrote in : Mxsmanic wrote in : Gig 601XL Builder writes: So is it your opinion that had the US not sworn to protect Western Europe during the cold war the USSR would probably still not ever attemped to take over Western Europe? I don't know. Would the US have attempted to take over Warsaw Pact countries if the USSR had not been protecting them? Good grief. Mx has a point. The situation was symmetrical, i.e. from their POV the Warsaw Pact thought they were "protecting" themselves from an imminent attack by NATO. Problem is, none of his points come from anywhere but Wikipedia. His "viewpoint" is pretty meaningless considering it's viewed through his rectum. Phew. I was beginning to worry that your replies were actually sensible, but it's good to see you're back on track. ;-) |
#363
|
|||
|
|||
$98 per barrel oil
"Snowbird" wrote in
i.fi: "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message .. . Wolfgang Schwanke wrote in : Bertie the Bunyip wrote in : Mxsmanic wrote in : Gig 601XL Builder writes: So is it your opinion that had the US not sworn to protect Western Europe during the cold war the USSR would probably still not ever attemped to take over Western Europe? I don't know. Would the US have attempted to take over Warsaw Pact countries if the USSR had not been protecting them? Good grief. Mx has a point. The situation was symmetrical, i.e. from their POV the Warsaw Pact thought they were "protecting" themselves from an imminent attack by NATO. Problem is, none of his points come from anywhere but Wikipedia. His "viewpoint" is pretty meaningless considering it's viewed through his rectum. Phew. I was beginning to worry that your replies were actually sensible, but it's good to see you're back on track. ;-) Hey, I have occasional lapses. I'm only Bunyip. Bertie |
#364
|
|||
|
|||
$98 per barrel oil
On Nov 14, 9:50 am, Jay Honeck wrote:
Uh, Matt -- reality check he You're asking a troll who specializes in lame, one-sentence insults Good luck. "Your Aviation Destination" Uh, Jay-- reality check here; we all have to endure all of your racially and politically charged OT posts, what kind of car you want to drive, every time your kid takes a flying lesson, advertising your business on Usnet, etc. You are probably one of the last people who should be questioning a poster's motivation. KFB |
#365
|
|||
|
|||
$98 per barrel oil
On Nov 15, 7:38 am, Jay Honeck wrote:
Really, you think so? I love revisionist history. Apparently German schools are teaching the same type of relativistic history Jay, you have some *interesting* views on politics and history. And more power to ya, but when you sugest that just because Wolf disagres with you that his education was somehow flawed or corupted, you are making yourself look petty (And kinda silly). This might come as a shock to you, but I dont think most of the planet shares your White American Supremist tude. Wolfgang is a free man today, and can believe whatever he wants, precisely BECAUSE of what our parents and grandparents did for him. Perhaps someday he'll come to understand that... That Red White and Blue arogance again {G}. -- Jay Honeck KFB |
#366
|
|||
|
|||
$98 per barrel oil
Thomas Borchert wrote:
Matt, I don't think there is any universal consensus on this topic. I agree. However, the number of serious historians agreeing with Jay's view of things is really, really small. That may well be, but I've not seen anyone here offer a single view on the topic other than Jay. Many trash his view, but nobody has the courage to offer their own view. Matt |
#367
|
|||
|
|||
$98 per barrel oil
Matt Whiting wrote in news:JG4%i.824$2n4.24552
@news1.epix.net: Thomas Borchert wrote: Matt, I don't think there is any universal consensus on this topic. I agree. However, the number of serious historians agreeing with Jay's view of things is really, really small. That may well be, but I've not seen anyone here offer a single view on the topic other than Jay. Many trash his view, but nobody has the courage to offer their own view. He hasn't got a view, he has prejudices and fears. There;'s a difference. Bertie |
#368
|
|||
|
|||
$98 per barrel oil
"Wolfgang Schwanke" wrote Mx has a point. The situation was symmetrical, i.e. from their POV the Warsaw Pact thought they were "protecting" themselves from an imminent attack by NATO. Whenever I see ANYONE agreeing with a point that was posed by MX, I can only conclude one thing. That person is MXed in the head. The one constant in the world, is that MX is always wrong. Not even close to right. Not even. So, my friend, to go down the path, any path, with MX has put you in one, and the only position that is possible. You're MXed in the head. What small amount of credibility you ever had has evaporated. -- Jim in NC |
#369
|
|||
|
|||
$98 per barrel oil
"Morgans" wrote in
: "Wolfgang Schwanke" wrote Mx has a point. The situation was symmetrical, i.e. from their POV the Warsaw Pact thought they were "protecting" themselves from an imminent attack by NATO. Whenever I see ANYONE agreeing with a point that was posed by MX, I can only conclude one thing. That person is MXed in the head. I thought you were ignoring Anthony. Bertie |
#370
|
|||
|
|||
$98 per barrel oil
Morgans writes:
You're MXed in the head. What small amount of credibility you ever had has evaporated. An unconditional prejudice against any opinion from a given source that overrides consideration of the opinion on its own merits is not a strong basis for credibility. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Myth: 1 G barrel rolls are impossible. | Jim Logajan | Piloting | 244 | June 22nd 07 04:33 AM |
barrel roll in 172 | Andrey Serbinenko | Piloting | 154 | August 20th 06 04:11 AM |
Bomb in a pickle barrel from 10,000 feet | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 15 | September 3rd 04 05:51 PM |
Barrel roll And g's Quest. | Robert11 | Aerobatics | 6 | July 16th 03 02:51 PM |
Barrel Roll And g's Quest. | Robert11 | General Aviation | 6 | July 12th 03 01:47 AM |