If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#181
|
|||
|
|||
Primary training in a Hi Perf complex acft
Bertie the Bunyip writes:
You don't even know what either one of them are, fjukkwit. Or you wouldn't ask suchj a question. If you used the FMC, autopilot, or other automation systems, you were using automation. If you flew it by hand, it was a very old aircraft without automation, or for some reason you eschew automation and your company doesn't mind that you fly by hand. That would make you an exception to the rule, however. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#182
|
|||
|
|||
Primary training in a Hi Perf complex acft
Bertie the Bunyip writes:
Yes, there is. What obstacle is that? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#183
|
|||
|
|||
Primary training in a Hi Perf complex acft
Bertie,
No, it isn't fjukkwit. Can you please just go away? Your retarded behaviour is rather pathetic. Amazing how many people can be way more annoying than MX as a reaction to him. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#184
|
|||
|
|||
Primary training in a Hi Perf complex acft
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Bertie the Bunyip writes: Yes, there is. What obstacle is that? The obstacle is called experience, real experience in a broad range of aircraft. And until you get it, you will never understand any of this, unless you someday learn to enrich your knowledge with the advice shared with you by most of the members of this group, instead of practicing your denial skills simply because reality doesn't support your desires. I have flown several sims, and found them very realistic, useful and enjoyable. But again, until you have actually experienced flying a broad range of real aircraft, you will never have the ability to understand just how unrealistic your questions and assumptions are. Actually I'm very surprised. You sound like a very intelligent person, and have obviously spent a great deal of time reading and flying your sim. But why you are having such a terrible time understanding the concept of actual hands on experience strongly suggests - you are somewhere in the neighborhood of 10 to 12 years old, have a serious problem understanding concepts beyond the written word, are simply a troll that enjoys the damage he does to an otherwise very useful forum, or some combination of the three. But whatever the reason, you have no grasp in how ignorant you prove yourself to at least 98% of this group, who have the experience and understanding you so desperately lack. |
#185
|
|||
|
|||
Primary training in a Hi Perf complex acft
Maxwell writes:
The obstacle is called experience, real experience in a broad range of aircraft. No, that's not it. The reality is that there isn't any particular obstacle .... that's why nobody has described what the imaginary "obstacles" are. The rest of your post follows the standard pattern of one personal attack after another. You cannot make something true by repeating it over and over in a loud voice. You cannot invalidate criticisms of your unsupported assertions by launching continual personal attacks against the parties who make them. If your opinions reflect reality, and they are not merely the result of emotional desires or wholesale adoption from people you regard as unquestioned authority figures, then you'll be able to support your opinions with explanation and reasoning based on premises that all parties accept. If your opinions do not reflect reality, you will have no way of supporting them, and if you hold those opinions very dear, you will become upset and attack anyone who questions them. This is fairly fundamental to human behavior and forms a very reliable pattern. The only way to escape it is to think for yourself, instead of believing what others say without question, and to base all your opinions and facts and reasoning, and not on feelings and emotions. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#186
|
|||
|
|||
Primary training in a Hi Perf complex acft
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Maxwell writes: The obstacle is called experience, real experience in a broad range of aircraft. No, that's not it. The reality is that there isn't any particular obstacle ... that's why nobody has described what the imaginary "obstacles" are. There is no possible way to explain the value of actual experience. If a person can't understand the difference in fantasy and reality, or simply refuses to do so, there is nothing you can do to enlighten them. The rest of your post follows the standard pattern of one personal attack after another. You cannot make something true by repeating it over and over in a loud voice. You cannot invalidate criticisms of your unsupported assertions by launching continual personal attacks against the parties who make them. Then find a way to certify your age for us. My guess is you are a 10 or 12 year old intellectual. Because the value you seem to place on actual experience, strongly suggests you are not old enough to have any experience with anything, much less something as complex as piloting an aircraft. If your opinions reflect reality, and they are not merely the result of emotional desires or wholesale adoption from people you regard as unquestioned authority figures, then you'll be able to support your opinions with explanation and reasoning based on premises that all parties accept. If your opinions do not reflect reality, you will have no way of supporting them, and if you hold those opinions very dear, you will become upset and attack anyone who questions them. Same answer as above. This is fairly fundamental to human behavior and forms a very reliable pattern. The only way to escape it is to think for yourself, instead of believing what others say without question, and to base all your opinions and facts and reasoning, and not on feelings and emotions. The only pattern I see in anyone's participation in your posts, is your complete denial of reality as opposed to your perception of it. |
#187
|
|||
|
|||
Primary training in a Hi Perf complex acft
Maxwell writes:
There is no possible way to explain the value of actual experience. Yeah, right. If a person can't understand the difference in fantasy and reality, or simply refuses to do so, there is nothing you can do to enlighten them. Yes. Even when you point out to them that they can't seem to substantiate their imaginings, they persist in believing in them, as I've already explained. Then find a way to certify your age for us. Hard as it may be to believe, age is not a factor here. My guess is you are a 10 or 12 year old intellectual. Over the years I've found that people who agree with me usually assume that I'm close to their age. People who don't agree with me always think I'm much younger or older. Whether they are correct or not is purely a roll of the dice. Because the value you seem to place on actual experience, strongly suggests you are not old enough to have any experience with anything, much less something as complex as piloting an aircraft. I place a considerable value on experience, but I don't accept "experience is the difference" as an isolated assertion in itself. Any assertion that cannot be substantiated is suspect. The only pattern I see in anyone's participation in your posts, is your complete denial of reality as opposed to your perception of it. Whereas nobody else here could possibly have that problem, eh? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#188
|
|||
|
|||
Primary training in a Hi Perf complex acft
Thomas Borchert wrote in
: Bertie, No, it isn't fjukkwit. Can you please just go away? Your retarded behaviour is rather pathetic. Amazing how many people can be way more annoying than MX as a reaction to him. Don't know how to use a killfile? Bertie |
#189
|
|||
|
|||
Primary training in a Hi Perf complex acft
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Bertie the Bunyip writes: You don't even know what either one of them are, fjukkwit. Or you wouldn't ask suchj a question. If you used the FMC, autopilot, or other automation systems, you were using automation. Yeah, so? If you flew it by hand, it was a very old aircraft without automation, or for some reason you eschew automation and your company doesn't mind that you fly by hand. That would make you an exception to the rule, however. Nope., and there is no rule, fjukktard Bertie |
#190
|
|||
|
|||
Primary training in a Hi Perf complex acft
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Bertie the Bunyip writes: Yes, there is. What obstacle is that? What article is what, oh fjukkktard who claims to have been a sysadmin and yet doesn't know how to use usenet? Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Primary nav source | Wizard of Draws | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | December 21st 05 07:11 AM |
Insurance out of hand? - AOPA flying clubs high perf retractable | Ron | Piloting | 4 | February 18th 05 08:40 AM |
Insurance requirements out of hand? - AOPA high perf retractable for Flying Clubs | ron | Piloting | 6 | February 16th 05 03:33 AM |
Need to rent an a/c for primary training | Briand200 | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | May 28th 04 04:40 PM |
WTB metal mid perf. | DGRTEK | Soaring | 2 | January 26th 04 03:27 PM |