change of name.

i think they should change the name of this newsgroup to war in IRAQ or
something similar cos its all this **** about Bush, Blair, Saddam, Iraq all
the time, there arent many posters about the kind of normal topics i used to
find here, so i think its time to say TA TA,to this newsgroup.

"M. H. Greaves" wrote:

I am fed up hearing about this, absolutely fed up to the back teeth with it,
this is supposed to be a n/g about military aviation not a personal rallying
point for anti war protesters. If you have such strong views about the gulf
war, why not start a new forum about it instead of posting all your anarchic
whinings on what was a good news group before people like you took over with
your propaganda rantings.

It is clearly time for you to discover how the filter on your NG reader works,
so you can effortlessly avoid reading such posts. Unless you're reading this
all on google in which case you're slightly screwed, but even then you don't
have to open the threads.

Guy

I am fed up hearing about this, absolutely fed up to the back teeth with it,
this is supposed to be a n/g about military aviation not a personal rallying
point for anti war protesters. If you have such strong views about the gulf
war, why not start a new forum about it instead of posting all your anarchic
whinings on what was a good news group before people like you took over with
your propaganda rantings.
"Oelewapper" wrote in message
...

"M. H. Greaves" wrote in message
...

i think they should change the name of this newsgroup to war in IRAQ
or something similar cos its all this **** about Bush, Blair, Saddam,
Iraq
all the time

Don't blame the opposition and please, don't blame independent posters
speaking their mind.

Instead, blame GWB and his crazy policies.

If there's anything abnormal for military people, then it is the USAF
bombing Mosques in Iraq, fighting a so-called "war on terror" ...

If anything ought to be OFF TOPIC in this rec.av.mil newsgroup, than it
should have been the war in Iraq.

Unfortunately it is not.

IMHO, WGB and TB are the ones that are OT.

People looking for the truth and/or opposing the illegal bombings and
occupation simply are NOT OT.


Oele.
-----
Air America: The greatest CIA-operation ever !!!
http://www.cia.gov/csi/studies/winter99-00/art7.html
http://airamericaradio.com/


i think they should change the name of this newsgroup to war in IRAQ or
something similar cos its all this **** about Bush, Blair, Saddam, Iraq
all
the time, there arent many posters about the kind of normal topics i
used
to
find here, so i think its time to say TA TA,to this newsgroup.

"Oelewapper" wrote

Instead, blame GWB and his crazy policies.

Blame ALGore and JFKerry for losing.

trouble is, thats all there is on the group now and you can tell by the kind
of titles the posts have, so instead of not opening the posts at all i'll
not bother visiting the news group any more.
"Guy Alcala" wrote in message
. ..
"M. H. Greaves" wrote:

I am fed up hearing about this, absolutely fed up to the back teeth with
it,
this is supposed to be a n/g about military aviation not a personal
rallying
point for anti war protesters. If you have such strong views about the
gulf
war, why not start a new forum about it instead of posting all your
anarchic
whinings on what was a good news group before people like you took over
with
your propaganda rantings.

It is clearly time for you to discover how the filter on your NG reader
works,
so you can effortlessly avoid reading such posts. Unless you're reading
this
all on google in which case you're slightly screwed, but even then you
don't
have to open the threads.

Guy

"Oelewapper" wrote in message
...

For your information: GWB is the one who lost the popular vote - only he
and the neo-cons are the ones to blame.


But Bush won more states and more counties than Gore.

"Oelewapper" wrote
"D. Strang" wrote
"Oelewapper" wrote

Instead, blame GWB and his crazy policies.

Blame ALGore and JFKerry for losing.

For your information: GWB is the one who lost the popular vote - only he and
the neo-cons are the ones to blame.

For your information, the one with the most electors wins.