A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Question about 175B



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old August 11th 03, 10:33 PM
Wayne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ah! Found it. The 175C model had the CS prop. Thanks for the tip, the
word Powermatic is what I needed...
Wayne


Model R172E/H/J: 210HP, 6 Cyl, 100 Oct Continental IO-360-D**
Model R172K: 195HP, 6 Cyl, 100 Oct Continental
IO-360-K/KB**
Military T-41B & D 210HP, 6 Cyl, 100 Oct Continental
IO-360-D***
Model 175 C & P172D (Powermatic)175HP, 6 Cyl, 80 Oct Continental GO-300-D*

Notes:
* Cessna experienced trouble with the geared engines in the model 175
(also known as the Skylark) and, in 1963, changed the designation
to P172D (also known as the Powermatic) in an attempt to remove the
stigma of the engine. The 175 has always been, basically, a 172 airframe
with some changes. The P172D is even more so: it's a straight 172D
airframe.
For more information, see note 1 below.

Comments:

1. The geared Continental engines used in the C175 Skylark and
P172D Powermatic have a history of upper-end (cylinder) distress ostensibily
caused by the higher RPMs. It is supposedly becoming very difficult
to overhaul these engines as parts are in short supply, especially
for the gearboxes. Major $$$$$ for gearbox parts.

A guy on my field has a constant-speed prop on his GO-300 powered cessna.
It's a Cessna 172 "Powermatic", which is what they called the 175/Skylark
after it got it's bad reputation. The CS prop is from the factory, the

prop
governor is mounted on the back side of the reduction gear housing on top
of the engine.

Any you guessed it, people wouldn't rev the engine high enough, AND they'd
use the prop to decelerate (backdriving the engine), which is a no-no with
a geared engine. So, these engines got a bad reputation.
--
Aaron Coolidge (N9376J)



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VOR/DME Approach Question Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 47 August 29th 04 05:03 AM
A question on Airworthiness Inspection Dave S Home Built 1 August 10th 04 05:07 AM
Phoenix AIM-54A (QUESTION) Krztalizer Naval Aviation 10 February 23rd 04 07:22 AM
Question about Question 4488 [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 3 October 27th 03 01:26 AM
T Tail question Paul Austin Military Aviation 7 September 23rd 03 06:05 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.