My 1 2 3 Test info

Using Xnews, I just did 3 uploads of an F-4 picture file which shows almost
4KB.

The first test was a straight upload. It was broke into 10 files of 8K and
one at 5714.

The second was with MIME. It also was broke into 11 files with very near the
same results.

The third test was an upload in yEnc. This time the file was broke into only
10 sections nine of which were in the 3200 range and one in the 2000 range.

Someone said yEnc creates a larger file. I'm at a loss how that is figured
seeing as this test indicates the opposit.

I'm not trying to start an argument, I'm trying to discover the most
effective method to upload as compared to a standard generic upload.

Hey Clem...
the most effective method, as compared to your three posts.. is right
here....
Resized to a whopping 135kb...
Quck, easy, and guess what.. a good old fashioned JPEG....
I can view anything posted here...yENC, Mime, etc..etc..
but WHAT IS THE POINT?

Glen in Orlando.

WTG Glen.........the quality is great. Thanks for posting.

I use Fast Stone photo resizer for all my digital needs. It's fast,easy
to use and I reduce the photos to screensaver size. Fast Stone is free
which is even better.

I agree, what is the point to such large files?

Proving "points" is not what this group is about. But then you'll always
have a few that have to post differently, because they can.
I think far more folks will look if they are posted just like you have
done. I think they'd have then many positive reactions.

JRW

Glen in Orlando wrote:
Hey Clem...
the most effective method, as compared to your three posts.. is right
here....
Resized to a whopping 135kb...
Quck, easy, and guess what.. a good old fashioned JPEG....
I can view anything posted here...yENC, Mime, etc..etc..
but WHAT IS THE POINT?

Glen in Orlando.

JRW..
it is bizarre isn't it?
This is supposed to be about sharing airplane pix. Yet it turns into little
more then a study in watching grown people act like children. Especially
when we don't know each others real identity, and can change our identity at
will. Seems borderline psychotic to me.

J-3's pics are interesting.. but one has to wonder why anyone would want to
spend as much time as he does posting pix that are already available, easier
to view elsewhere, and could be resized and posted much faster with less
bandwidth then the method he uses....

It really seems that we have quite a few 'troubled' individuals here. The
unfortunate downside of all this is that over the past year or so a number
of truly gifted photographers have pretty much given up on posting their
stuff here. I don't blame them as their efforts get blown out of the water
by these floods that push their stuff off of the servers in short order...
sigh.

So start the attacks folks.. But remember.. your attacking an anonymous
name.... tomorrow I could be Tim in Toledo.. that's how nuts you've all
become...

gotta go fly...

Glen in Orlando

"Glen in Orlando" wrote in message
ng.com...
JRW..

gotta go fly...

Glen in Orlando



I like the idea about getting laid, hmmm I might give that a try.


I'm sure my wife will take your word for it.



--

Cheers

Dave Kearton

On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 07:31:22 -0400, "Glen in Orlando"
wrote:

JRW..
it is bizarre isn't it?
This is supposed to be about sharing airplane pix. Yet it turns into little
more then a study in watching grown people act like children. Especially
when we don't know each others real identity, and can change our identity at
will. Seems borderline psychotic to me.

J-3's pics are interesting.. but one has to wonder why anyone would want to
spend as much time as he does posting pix that are already available, easier
to view elsewhere, and could be resized and posted much faster with less
bandwidth then the method he uses....

It really seems that we have quite a few 'troubled' individuals here. The
unfortunate downside of all this is that over the past year or so a number
of truly gifted photographers have pretty much given up on posting their
stuff here. I don't blame them as their efforts get blown out of the water
by these floods that push their stuff off of the servers in short order...
sigh.

So start the attacks folks.. But remember.. your attacking an anonymous
name.... tomorrow I could be Tim in Toledo.. that's how nuts you've all
become...

gotta go fly...

Glen in Orlando

Classic neurotic passive-aggresive behavior. Come out all superior,
accuse others of being "troubled," then retreat into anonymity. Putz

I have no problem with anyone who wants to honestly and maturely
debate the merits of .rar vs. individual photos, and those who
genuinely would like to learn more about various forms of posting. If
the majority decide upon a particular format, so be it. I don't -for
example- mind yEnc myself, but many others loathe it.

I do have a problem with jackassery, and Glen the troll just stoutly
identified himself so. Dolt.

JRW wrote in news:48afee53$0$19192$dbd4b001
@news.wanadoo.nl:

WTG Glen.........the quality is great. Thanks for posting.

I use Fast Stone photo resizer for all my digital needs. It's fast,easy
to use and I reduce the photos to screensaver size. Fast Stone is free
which is even better.

I agree, what is the point to such large files?

Proving "points" is not what this group is about. But then you'll always
have a few that have to post differently, because they can.
I think far more folks will look if they are posted just like you have
done. I think they'd have then many positive reactions.

JRW

Glen in Orlando wrote:
Hey Clem...
the most effective method, as compared to your three posts.. is right
here....
Resized to a whopping 135kb...
Quck, easy, and guess what.. a good old fashioned JPEG....
I can view anything posted here...yENC, Mime, etc..etc..
but WHAT IS THE POINT?

Glen in Orlando.





Let me ask this question, it's yEnc free.

What is the maximum file size, not lines in a file, but the actual file
size before it's broken into sections by a server? I would say 8K max. Did
anyone elses server reduce my one large file into anything larger than an
8K file?

No, this is not about proving points or anything else except to provide
better through-put on the servers. Until you experiment a little or ask
questions how can you impove on anything?

"Clem" schreef in bericht
. 97.136...
JRW wrote in news:48afee53$0$19192$dbd4b001
@news.wanadoo.nl:

WTG Glen.........the quality is great. Thanks for posting.

I use Fast Stone photo resizer for all my digital needs. It's fast,easy
to use and I reduce the photos to screensaver size. Fast Stone is free
which is even better.

I agree, what is the point to such large files?

Proving "points" is not what this group is about. But then you'll always
have a few that have to post differently, because they can.
I think far more folks will look if they are posted just like you have
done. I think they'd have then many positive reactions.

JRW

Glen in Orlando wrote:
Hey Clem...
the most effective method, as compared to your three posts.. is right
here....
Resized to a whopping 135kb...
Quck, easy, and guess what.. a good old fashioned JPEG....
I can view anything posted here...yENC, Mime, etc..etc..
but WHAT IS THE POINT?

Glen in Orlando.





Let me ask this question, it's yEnc free.

What is the maximum file size, not lines in a file, but the actual file
size before it's broken into sections by a server? I would say 8K max. Did
anyone elses server reduce my one large file into anything larger than an
8K file?

No, this is not about proving points or anything else except to provide
better through-put on the servers. Until you experiment a little or ask
questions how can you impove on anything?

Don't know about ABPA, but I posted a couple of pictures to
alt.binaries.pictures.military recently alll about 500 k in size and they
came through fine. I think this should work here too. Posted them one at a
time, though.

Regards,
Herman

Clem wrote:
JRW wrote in news:48afee53$0$19192$dbd4b001
@news.wanadoo.nl:


WTG Glen.........the quality is great. Thanks for posting.

I use Fast Stone photo resizer for all my digital needs. It's fast,easy
to use and I reduce the photos to screensaver size. Fast Stone is free
which is even better.

I agree, what is the point to such large files?

Proving "points" is not what this group is about. But then you'll always
have a few that have to post differently, because they can.
I think far more folks will look if they are posted just like you have
done. I think they'd have then many positive reactions.

JRW

Glen in Orlando wrote:

Hey Clem...
the most effective method, as compared to your three posts.. is right
here....
Resized to a whopping 135kb...
Quck, easy, and guess what.. a good old fashioned JPEG....
I can view anything posted here...yENC, Mime, etc..etc..
but WHAT IS THE POINT?

Glen in Orlando.






Let me ask this question, it's yEnc free.

What is the maximum file size, not lines in a file, but the actual file
size before it's broken into sections by a server? I would say 8K max. Did
anyone elses server reduce my one large file into anything larger than an
8K file?

No, this is not about proving points or anything else except to provide
better through-put on the servers. Until you experiment a little or ask
questions how can you impove on anything?

Yes I agree, but that's what the "test" newsgroups are about... ))
Also underused because everyone "tests" in the actual newsgroups...lol
Not a dig at you, just mentioning the tests groups. ))

JRW

On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 10:35:20 -0500, Clem
wrote:

JRW wrote in news:48afee53$0$19192$dbd4b001
:

WTG Glen.........the quality is great. Thanks for posting.

I use Fast Stone photo resizer for all my digital needs. It's fast,easy
to use and I reduce the photos to screensaver size. Fast Stone is free
which is even better.

I agree, what is the point to such large files?

Proving "points" is not what this group is about. But then you'll always
have a few that have to post differently, because they can.
I think far more folks will look if they are posted just like you have
done. I think they'd have then many positive reactions.

JRW

Glen in Orlando wrote:
Hey Clem...
the most effective method, as compared to your three posts.. is right
here....
Resized to a whopping 135kb...
Quck, easy, and guess what.. a good old fashioned JPEG....
I can view anything posted here...yENC, Mime, etc..etc..
but WHAT IS THE POINT?

Glen in Orlando.





Let me ask this question, it's yEnc free.

What is the maximum file size, not lines in a file, but the actual file
size before it's broken into sections by a server? I would say 8K max. Did
anyone elses server reduce my one large file into anything larger than an
8K file?

No, this is not about proving points or anything else except to provide
better through-put on the servers. Until you experiment a little or ask
questions how can you impove on anything?

The units are all mixed up in this thread. 8000 lines perhaps, but 8K
means 8KB, which is minute.

The max for some servers is 1MB per post. For mine it's 10MB. Try it
and see.
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

Two car salesmen were sitting at the bar.
One complained to the other, "Boy, business sucks. If I don't sell more cars this month, I'm going to lose my ****ing ass."
Too late he noticed a beautiful blonde sitting two stools away.
Immediately, he apologized for his bad language.
"That's okay," the blonde replied, "If I don't sell more ass this month, I'm going to lose my ****ing car."