If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
Rutan on Global Warming
On Aug 8, 7:08*am, "Dan Luke" wrote:
"Morgans" *wrote: Dan, if you are as smart as you think you are, you would realize that the two sides of this argument will never agree, and it does not matter what proof you claim to have. *In result, you would just quit arguing, and move on to a different subject, without caring who gets the last word. The same thing could be said to the other people arguing with Dan. -- Oh, you're right of course, Jim. *I've been in enough of these arguments here and elswhere to know it's no longer an issue of facts with most people. But a respected guy likeRutanspouting nonsense in public on a subject he clearly does not understand is something I couldn't let pass without comment. I'll leave it with what I've posted so far; the others can claim victory if they like. Dan T182T at 4R4 Rutan's pitch had nothing to do with his climate science expertice. The pitch dealt with Data Presentation Fraud. Instead of being critical of Rutan, download his PowerPoint slides and be sure you look also at the speaker's notes. The PPT file can be downloaded at http://rps3.com/ |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
Rutan on Global Warming
"Matt Barrow" wrote: Go away, Matty, before you get smashed again. Hey, Dan, have you ever figured out the difference between Humidity and Relative Humidity. You are referring, of course, to your claim the humidity was 99% during the hottest part of the day in the in the Chicago heat wave. You pulled that straight out of your ass, Matty, as you do most things you post. I showed you back then how that was bull**** . You fled, after some lame remark about the "heat index". Now you're trying to claim you were talking about the *other* humidity? Haw-haw-haw! You're an absolute laff riot, Matty. Did you ever find out why your CO2 refutation was off by a foctor of 100? *boggle* Do you imagine Google Groups has stopped working so you can lie like this with impunity? It was your Ol' Perfesser, some crank you found on one of your wingnut hangouts, who was off. Think back, hard, Matty; concentrate. We've had almost this exact conversation before. You looked like a fool then and you look like a fool now. http://tinyurl.com/ns975r And speaking of lies, how about the time you claimed you'd plonked Logajan just so you could avoid answering him? But you hadn't, had you? And can you explain what happened to Mann's "Hockey Stick", why the IPCC dropped it? Uh, yes. It was in the 2001 report. There was a new IPCC report in 2007, using newer research. March of science, right, Matty? Not that, as it turns out, there was anything substantially wrong with MBH98. Several subsequent NH temperature proxy studies by other scientists have produced graphs shaped like...guess what? I have cites. You know I do. (Kdding. Please stick around. I enjoy the loon-whacking.) Whacking off again, Dan? You're completely delusional. You and your goons, birds-of-a-feather are finished, got it! Mmm, no, Matty. What I've got is a few idle minutes to whack one of the goofiest denier loons I've encountered. (That would be you, Matty.) Well, Dan, Please explain the processes that kindle the initial temperature rises and whether or not those same processes remain operative. You can also explain how the temperature drops while CO2 concentrations remain elevated. Only with logical fallicies and links to whackjobs that have been refuted or shown to be blatently fraudulent. *yawn* Arm waving and spit blowing from Matty. Do you know what the National Academy of Sciences is, Matty? Do you know its accuracy record over 140 years of reporting to Congress on scientific questions? Have you followed the progression of its reports on AGW over the last two decades? Do you know what it is saying now? Could it be that CO2 is NOT a significant cause of climate change? It is so insignificant as to be irrelevant. The emerging data is showing warming to be something like 98% ocean currents and solar activity (about a 99% correlation and a good explanation of causation). ********. TSI has not risen in concert with temperature and CO2 over the last 30+ years: Plenty of cites for this, too. But you don't really don't care, do you? That's why the AGW crowd is getting desperate. You're just whistling past the graveyard, Matty. Hell, even Newt Gingrich has given it up being a denier. You should, too. -- Dan T182T at 4R4 |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
Rutan on Global Warming
"burt" wrote in message ... On Aug 8, 7:08 am, "Dan Luke" wrote: "Morgans" wrote: Dan, if you are as smart as you think you are, you would realize that the two sides of this argument will never agree, and it does not matter what proof you claim to have. In result, you would just quit arguing, and move on to a different subject, without caring who gets the last word. The same thing could be said to the other people arguing with Dan. -- Rutan's pitch had nothing to do with his climate science expertice. The pitch dealt with Data Presentation Fraud. Instead of being critical of Rutan, download his PowerPoint slides and be sure you look also at the speaker's notes. The PPT file can be downloaded at http://rps3.com/ Quite interesting. I've seen severtal of these misrepresentations, but a few new ones in there. The explanation of the forcing action of CO2 and how the doubling effect is only a levels starting a near zero (and rising linearly, rather than logarithmically and reaching the peak at a much lower level than we're at), is well stated but could be explained in lieu of the models that predicted wrongly. Matt |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
Rutan on Global Warming
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:07:08 -0400, Jessica wrote:
Frankly, Please don't feed this assclown troll. |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
Rutan on Global Warming
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:00:54 -0400, Jessica wrote:
Hmmm, Please don't feed the assclown troll. |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
Rutan on Global Warming
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:09:55 -0400, Jessica wrote:
So, Assclown troll warning. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Global Warming The debbil made me do it | Denny | Piloting | 442 | April 5th 08 12:26 PM |
My Modest Proposal to End Global Warming, Revitalize General Aviation, and End Our Dependence on Foreign Oil | Skylune | Owning | 0 | October 19th 07 10:47 PM |
My Modest Proposal to End Global Warming, Revitalize General Aviation, and End Our Dependence on Foreign Oil | Skylune | Owning | 0 | October 19th 07 09:21 PM |
I have an opinion on global warming! | Jim Logajan | Piloting | 89 | April 12th 07 12:56 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: CBS Spotlights Aviation's Effect On Global Warming!!! | Free Speaker | General Aviation | 1 | August 3rd 06 07:24 PM |