If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
If user fees go into effect I'm done
"Wolfgang Schwanke" wrote in message ... The EU is not exactly a democratic organisation. Even though it was originally implemented by democratically elected politicians, the influx of the voter's opinion on politician's actions is limited in representative democracies anyway. Once the damage has been done (and noticed), very little can be done about it. Privatisation of government tasks is part of neoliberal ideology, What does the EU see as the proper function of government? In _classical liberal_ thought, the role of government was police on the local level, courts of law, and a military. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
If user fees go into effect I'm done
Recently, Steven P. McNicoll posted:
"Wolfgang Schwanke" wrote in message news The US is a direct democracy? No, it is a representative democracy, unfortunately. The US government cannot ignore what the people want? The US government does so regularly. Woflgang understands these points. The one to whom the questions are posed, not surprisingly at all, does not. Neil |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
If user fees go into effect I'm done
Jose wrote in
t: Behind that nose is a very large camel. The nose came in 1919. Head and neck - 1926. Front legs - 1940. We're getting pretty close to the hind quarter's here, and I think there's already too much momentum to stop the camel completely. As a pragmatic, the best that I can hope for is that us little guys can still afford to fly. Quite frankly, I have less sympathy for corporate Gulfstreams who use the system more than I do, weigh enough to make a difference on the runways, and probably are a more legitimate subject of the airline's complaint. In general, I don't think it would be a terrible idea to more clearly define GA as two classes - light single engines / twin aircraft and corporate / charter Jets. Most of the complaints of the public and airlines regarding security threats and tax advantages hold a different set of arguments with respect to the larger aircraft. One way to save yourself from the camel is to collect all your crap, move out and find a new tent before you wake up outside with nothing. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
If user fees go into effect I'm done
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 12:09:16 -0500, "Blueskies"
wrote in : I should have said govment provided service, rather than 'free', but that is the same as saying that you would rather only ride on toll roads, rather than the freeways we have today. Some things are best as a govment service because private providers will only do things that satisfy the profit motive. http://www.landlinemag.com/Special_R...%20by%20JJ.htm OOIDA has been very vocal in its opposition to auctioning off the interstate system. For example, the Association took a strong stance against the 75-year lease of the Indiana Toll Road. The Association is also lobbying hard in other states where privatization is being considered, including New Jersey and Pennsylvania. http://www.motherjones.com/news/feat...ighwaymen.html The deal to privatize the Toll Road had been almost a year in the making. Proponents celebrated it as a no-pain, all-gain way to off-load maintenance expenses and mobilize new highway-building funds without raising taxes. Opponents lambasted it as a major turn toward handing the nation's common property over to private firms, and at fire-sale prices to boot. The one thing everyone agreed on was that the Indiana deal was just a prelude to a host of such efforts to come. Across the nation, there is now talk of privatizing everything from the New York Thruway to the Ohio, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey turnpikes, as well as of inviting the private sector to build and operate highways and bridges from Alabama to Alaska. More than 20 states have enacted legislation allowing public-private partnerships, or P3s, to run highways. Robert Poole, the founder of the libertarian Reason Foundation and a longtime privatization advocate, estimates that some $25 billion in public-private highway deals are in the works—a remarkable figure given that as of 1991, the total cost of the interstate highway system was estimated at $128.9 billion. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
If user fees go into effect I'm done
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Blueskies" wrote in message . net... So, you are saying let Flight Watch die, which for now is a free service, and replace it with a privatized service for a fee. Yes, that is the problem... Flight Watch is not a free service, there are no free services. You consider Flight Watch to be a "free service" only because you don't pay for it directly, it's paid with taxes. I would much rather let Flight Watch die and replace it with private sector service providers that charge fees and compete for my patronage than pay a direct user fee to the FAA for each use of Flight Watch. Personally, I'd give up all government services if they would completely stop taxing me. Matt |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
If user fees go into effect I'm done
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Blueskies" wrote in message ... Sure, I should have said govment provided service, rather than 'free', but that is the same as saying that you would rather only ride on toll roads, rather than the freeways we have today. Some things are best as a govment service because private providers will only do things that satisfy the profit motive. What things provided as government services are superior to things provided by private providers motivated by the potential for profit? Defense. There is little profit motive here and I don't think you could support a national defense without a government. Matt |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
If user fees go into effect I'm done
scott moore wrote in
: 2 tons = 4000 pounds. Walk over to all the pilots on your home field with aircraft in this range, and tell them you have no problem at all with the government balancing the budget on their backs to save your own skin. Then tell us who is going to be on YOUR side when they reduce the weight requirement to 3,000 lbs. Then 2,000 lbs. Then 1,000 lbs. Then pass a bill declaring that private "hobby" aircraft are to be restricted to unpopulated areas only. Cessna 172s, Beech Bonanzas, and even Beech Barons pose a different threat and a different cost than King Airs, Pilati, Citations and Gulfstreams. Personal flying poses a different threat and cost than Corporate and Charter. Already there is differentiation - look at landing fees. They are based on class, engine count, and weight. Quite frankly, if someone is personally flying a Pilatus or King Air, he may find himself with a bit of the short end of the stick here, but he also is flying a King Air or a Pilatus, and probably can handle the difference. I would love to believe that can win this 'war' and avert user fees altogether. But my pragmatism or cynicism or whatever has led me to the conclusion that even if we divert this attack, the enemy will keep on coming. Seeing that it's a reality in Europe certainly dispells any illusions I may have had. In my opinion, the best we can hope for is that the public is smart enough to recognize that we little folk are not worth the effort and leave us alone. Quite frankly, I'm not sure we'll get that much. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
If user fees go into effect I'm done
On 2007-02-10, Judah wrote:
It looks like aircraft weighing less than 2 tons are exempt. I believe that would pretty much cover all single engine pistons. This is the case. I've never paid a single user fee (aside from landing fees, but the airports I generally visit are privately owned, and the landing fee is charged by the owner of the airfield, not the government). -- Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid. Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
If user fees go into effect I'm done
On 2007-02-10, Mxsmanic wrote:
Europeans are already accustomed to having their lives run for them by bureaucrats (now in several layers both domestic and international). It does not occur to them to _resist_ things. The ones who were willing to resist injustices and incompetence crossed the Atlantic and Pacific centuries ago. Europeans do actually resist - as evidenced by the massive response to the CAA's Mode S transponder proposals. However, the GA population is so small it is effectively disenfranchised - the CAA basically responded 'well we're going to do it anyway so there'. When you are 50,000 voters out of an electorate of 40 million, your opinion counts for nothing - especially when the CAA is leaned on heavily by moneyed corporate interests like the airlines - the executives of which can remove their donations to political parties if the CAA doesn't do what they want. In the end your only option if you don't like the CAA is to move somewhere else (typically the US). However, most pilots like enough _other_ things about their own country that they aren't prepared to move over just a single issue. -- Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid. Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
If user fees go into effect I'm done
On 2007-02-10, Mxsmanic wrote:
Wolfgang Schwanke writes: What I say above true for the US as well. Not unless the U.S. has changed very dramatically indeed. Last time I was there, mediocrity, social stratification, and complacency/apathy were not the watchwords that they are in Europe. I've lived in both Europe and the US for a significant time. I would beg to differ - the average European and American have more in common on this count than not. Social stratification is rife in the US - mainly caused by apathy! Just visit any trailer park. I would say though amongst the 'professional' class in the US, there is a much better 'can do' attitude though. -- Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid. Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
If user fees go into effect I'm done | [email protected] | Piloting | 286 | February 20th 07 02:02 AM |
Trouble ahead over small plane fees | AJ | Piloting | 90 | April 15th 06 01:19 PM |
What will user fees do to small towered airports | Steve Foley | Piloting | 10 | March 8th 06 03:13 PM |
GA User fees | Jose | Piloting | 48 | December 24th 05 02:12 AM |
The Irony of Boeing/Jeppesen Being Charged User Fees! | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 9 | January 23rd 04 12:23 PM |