If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
LSA Class?
As for the (LSA) aircraft, there is no reason to assume that they are
any less safe. It is certainly true that they are not required to be equipped for night flight or for flight in instrument conditions (flying inside the clouds) - but those operations are prohibited to the LSA SP anyway. The CT -- the only LSA I've flown -- had equipment comparable to my IFR-certified Pathfinder. And if flew wonderfully. LSAs need not be anything but excellent light aircraft. Will some SP in an LSA eventually do something really stupid and kill himself and maybe a passenger? Of course. And, unfortunate though it is, tonight some guy will down a couple of six packs and manage to kill himself and maybe a bunch of others on the highway. In both cases it was the stupidity that was unsafe, not the level of training or the mechanical condition of the vehicle. 'Twas ever thus, I'm afraid. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
LSA Class?
Jay Honeck wrote:
As for the (LSA) aircraft, there is no reason to assume that they are any less safe. It is certainly true that they are not required to be equipped for night flight or for flight in instrument conditions (flying inside the clouds) - but those operations are prohibited to the LSA SP anyway. The CT -- the only LSA I've flown -- had equipment comparable to my IFR-certified Pathfinder. And if flew wonderfully. LSAs need not be anything but excellent light aircraft. I haven't tried one yet, but hope to @ AOPA Expo '07. They seem like they would be a lot of fun, along the lines of many of the old taildraggers some of my fellow pilots own for hopping around the 'patch for the fun of it. A few of us who already own other aircraft have tossed the idea of buying an LSA as a group for a second local "fun" plane. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
LSA Class?
B A R R Y wrote:
Jay Honeck wrote: As for the (LSA) aircraft, there is no reason to assume that they are any less safe. It is certainly true that they are not required to be equipped for night flight or for flight in instrument conditions (flying inside the clouds) - but those operations are prohibited to the LSA SP anyway. The CT -- the only LSA I've flown -- had equipment comparable to my IFR-certified Pathfinder. And if flew wonderfully. LSAs need not be anything but excellent light aircraft. I haven't tried one yet, but hope to @ AOPA Expo '07. They seem like they would be a lot of fun, along the lines of many of the old taildraggers some of my fellow pilots own for hopping around the 'patch for the fun of it. A few of us who already own other aircraft have tossed the idea of buying an LSA as a group for a second local "fun" plane. That's what I'm thinking, but I want mine really light, open and probably amphib! Margy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
LSA Class?
passenger allowed? more skill required in bad weather? less reliable powerplants? My father just got a brand new Legend Cub. It is LSA compliant and it came with a brand new shiny factory O-200. Tell me please how that powerplant is less reliable than in a certified aircraft. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SPORTS CLASS/CLUB CLASS | 5 ugly | Soaring | 0 | July 2nd 06 11:14 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Carrying flight gear on the airlines | Peter MacPherson | Piloting | 20 | November 25th 04 12:29 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |