Dan Rather forges ahead

"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Dan Rather forges ahead
From: (B2431)
Date: 9/12/2004 6:17 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

From: (ArtKramr)
Date: 9/12/2004 7:15 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:


typical non answer from someone who refuses to respond to questions,
who
disrespects himself and others, who behaves as a child and breaks his
promises.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


What did you say you did in the Air Force?


Arthur Kramer


Actually I have given you the answer to that at least once before. I
don't
expect you to admit it since you are not an honourable man.

What did you say a neocon is? If you don't know the answer at least be
man
enough to say so.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired


Typical no answer answer.

Bwahaha! Coming from the undisputed and still "King of Refusing to Answer
Direct Questions", that is a hoot, Cosmo! What did you say a neocon was
again? Ooops--shouldn't have put in that "again", should I? You never
answered it the first time...or the second...or the forty-eighth time... At
some point you are really gonna have to stop using words you can't
understand the meaning of.

Brooks



Arthur Kramer

"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Dan Rather forges ahead
From: "Jarg"
Date: 9/11/2004 5:32 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: m

"Bob Coe" wrote in message
news:%JM0d.23965$ni.13950@okepread01...


I just don't see how a person like Dan Rather could be so easily duped
by
these forgeries. They weren't even originals! Hell even I can cut out
someone's
signature and put it on any letter I want with just a Xerox machine.
Today
I would just use my scanner and add it to my MS Word document.



I give him the benefit of the doubt - he saw what he wanted to see.


No, I think Dan Rather was putting his reputation behind a known
forgery, to give it credence, and to hurt the Republican party. I hope
it now results in his finally being put out to pasture (which should
have
happened 10 years ago anyway). Same with the other scum-bags on
60 minutes, who are always making a mountain out of a mole hill.



I'm sure he has no qualms about hurting the Republican party, but I still
think it unlikely he knew.

Jarg

Nothing to know. These were the real thing. The rest is just the usual
Neocon
spin.


Hey, what's a neocon?

"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Dan Rather forges ahead
From: Jim Yanik
Date: 9/12/2004 2:30 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

Chad Irby wrote in
m:

In article P%_0d.24205$ni.4337@okepread01, "Bob Coe"
wrote:

Someone called it "Rathergate" and I thought this was pretty funny,
since CBS attaches -gate to just about everything political.

A lot of folks are putting it online with the "th" superscripted,
sorta like "Ra^th^ergate."


Here's a good read about all this;
http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/Rea...e.asp?ID=14993

Ben Barnes is a DemocRATic co-chairman of Kerry's campaign.

Seems ol'Dan participated in a DemocRATic fundraiser while a CBS anchor.
(so much for impartiality)
(or credibility)

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik-at-kua.net


Typical Neocon logic. No logic.



What's a neocon? So far all I can tell is that you define it as "anyone who
ever disagrees with me".

"Thomas J. Paladino Jr." wrote in
news

"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Dan Rather forges ahead
From: Jim Yanik
Date: 9/12/2004 2:30 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

Chad Irby wrote in
m:

In article P%_0d.24205$ni.4337@okepread01, "Bob Coe"
wrote:

Someone called it "Rathergate" and I thought this was pretty
funny, since CBS attaches -gate to just about everything
political.

A lot of folks are putting it online with the "th" superscripted,
sorta like "Ra^th^ergate."


Here's a good read about all this;
http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/Rea...e.asp?ID=14993

Ben Barnes is a DemocRATic co-chairman of Kerry's campaign.

Seems ol'Dan participated in a DemocRATic fundraiser while a CBS
anchor. (so much for impartiality)
(or credibility)

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik-at-kua.net


Typical Neocon logic. No logic.



What's a neocon? So far all I can tell is that you define it as
"anyone who ever disagrees with me".





I suspect he didn't even READ the articles I listed.

Here's another from ABC,not exactly a "right wing" media source;

http://abcnews.go.com/sections/Polit...uments_040909-
1.html

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik-at-kua.net

"Ed Rasimus" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 06:35:06 -0400, Cub Driver
wrote:

On 11 Sep 2004 22:30:08 GMT, (Tom Cervo) wrote:

Come off it, Dan, anyone who used a typewriter knew the trick of lifting
the
roller a smidge (or lowering it) for sub (or super) script. You must not
have
ever typed footnotes.

And makes the letters tiny?

The forgeries were almost certainly created by Microsoft Word, and
were certainly created by a computer. The forger was so amateurish
that he didn't know how to turn off the auto-correct feature!

all the best -- Dan Ford

And, does anyone remember how you centered a heading with a
typewriter?

You counted the letters in the line to be typed, then centered the
roller and backspaced half the number of letters before starting to
type.

Can you imagine a commander typing himself an MFR going through that
sort of centered heading drill?

Well, Ed, the "memos" look like forgeries to me too but I've got to
wonder about that argument: were preprinted headers completely
unknown in the service back then?

On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 11:42:18 -0500, "Bob Coe" wrote:

Didn't the Guard have letterhead back then?

Actually, probably not. I was a company clerk in the army somewhat
earlier, and I never saw letterhead paper. (Never saw superscripts or
centering, either!)

Someone called it "Rathergate" and I thought this was pretty funny, since
CBS attaches -gate to just about everything political.

It's astonishing how little play this story is getting. Compare how
excited the networks and the newspapers got about Republicans'
contributing (oh no!) to the Swifties advertising pot.

But here is CBS News, where Walter Cronkite once reigned, peddling
forgeries that very likely were created by the Kerry campaign. But
when you Google "CBS forgeries", the returns you get are all from
second-tier newspapers with Republican proclivities, like the New York
Post.

There was one good story in the Washington Post. (The post, for all
its overt partisanship, is a very honest newspaper.) I'd be very
grateful if anyone could point me to stories in the New Times or Los
Angeles Times, for example.
all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

The Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com
Expedition sailboat charters www.expeditionsail.com

BUFDRVR wrote:
Tom Cervo wrote:


Come off it, Dan, anyone who used a typewriter knew the trick of lifting the
roller a smidge (or lowering it) for sub (or super) script. You must not have
ever typed footnotes.


The issue isn't the raised "th", but the fact that the "th" is written in a
smaller font as well.

From 1968 on SMC (Smith Corona) typewriters had two optional keyface
slots (shift one and shift +) for a number of optional letters, accents
and marks. I had section and paragraph marks on mine as I clerked in a
law office. "rd" and "nd" superscripts were also available.

Bill Jameson

Art wrote in response to:
Actually I have given you the answer to that at least once before. I don't
expect you to admit it since you are not an honourable man.


the following:
Typical no answer answer.


Don't talk about non answers Art. You are the master at not answering
questions.

I ask you again...What is the difference between...Horse apples, Sheep pebbles
and Cow patties? You ought to be able to answer that one with ease.

Rick
MFE

"Cub Driver" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 11:42:18 -0500, "Bob Coe" wrote:

snip

There was one good story in the Washington Post. (The post, for all
its overt partisanship, is a very honest newspaper.) I'd be very
grateful if anyone could point me to stories in the New Times or Los
Angeles Times, for example.

I used to think so, but after reading their (Washington Post) reporting of
the take down of Saddam last year and comparing it to what was actually
happening, I was forced to conclude that they were either, dishonest, stupid
or covering a completly different war than I was watching.

As for CBS, I stopped watching them after they showed a "live" picture of
New York on 1/1/2000 in which they had digitally covered the NBC Studios
sign with a CBS sign. You can't trust people who knowingly falsify the news.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

The Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com
Expedition sailboat charters www.expeditionsail.com

From: "Kevin Brooks"
Date: 9/12/2004 9:40 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:


"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Dan Rather forges ahead
From: (B2431)
Date: 9/12/2004 6:17 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

From: (ArtKramr)
Date: 9/12/2004 7:15 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:


typical non answer from someone who refuses to respond to questions,
who
disrespects himself and others, who behaves as a child and breaks his
promises.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


What did you say you did in the Air Force?


Arthur Kramer


Actually I have given you the answer to that at least once before. I
don't
expect you to admit it since you are not an honourable man.

What did you say a neocon is? If you don't know the answer at least be
man
enough to say so.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired


Typical no answer answer.

Bwahaha! Coming from the undisputed and still "King of Refusing to Answer
Direct Questions", that is a hoot, Cosmo! What did you say a neocon was
again? Ooops--shouldn't have put in that "again", should I? You never
answered it the first time...or the second...or the forty-eighth time... At
some point you are really gonna have to stop using words you can't
understand the meaning of.

Brooks

Arthur Kramer

You mean like the time last week he called clinton a combat veteran for
fighting impeachment? He lost that fight.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired